Value
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.4 |
| P/S | 6.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 18.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.25
ON · Why this verdict
Why ON Semiconductor (ON) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
ON Semiconductor carries excellent free cash flow conversion of 223% relative to net income and a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, but 51% of revenue comes from the automotive end-market creating concentration risk, the most recent quarter produced a large earnings miss of -121%, and the stock trades 24% above its analyst price target.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The automotive end-market accounts for 51% of ON Semiconductor's revenue, creating concentration risk to the electric vehicle and advanced driver assistance systems demand cycle — a market that has shown significant volatility as EV adoption rates have moderated from peak expectations. Bear case | Automotive revenue concentration falls below 45% of total sales within 12 months as industrial and other end-markets grow faster than automotive. | ↑Improving |
| CounterAutomotive semiconductor content per vehicle is structurally growing as electrification and driver assistance systems proliferate, so concentration in automotive may represent a structural tailwind rather than a risk if the technology transition continues. | ||
Free cash flow conversion of 223% relative to net income and a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 — the maximum possible — indicate that ON Semiconductor's financial reporting is conservative and the business generates significantly more cash than its accounting earnings suggest. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion remains above 150% of net income over the next 4 reported quarters, confirming the durable quality of cash generation. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh free cash flow relative to earnings in a semiconductor company often reflects large depreciation charges on fabrication facilities that depress GAAP earnings without reducing cash, which is a structural feature rather than an earnings quality advantage. | ||
ON Semiconductor is trading 24% above the analyst consensus price target, creating a negative asymmetry ratio of -1.6 that means the stock offers significantly more downside to consensus than upside from current levels — a fundamental mismatch between current price and analyst-derived fair value. Warnings | Analyst price targets are revised upward by more than 30% within 12 months following a semiconductor cycle recovery that restores automotive and industrial demand. | ↑Improving |
| CounterStocks can trade above analyst targets for extended periods during strong industry cycles, and analyst targets in semiconductors often lag actual earnings potential at cycle peaks when pricing power and utilization rates are both elevated. | ||
The most recent quarter produced a massive earnings miss of -121%, meaning the company reported a loss when analysts expected a profit, which — even if partially explained by one-time charges — signals that demand conditions or cost structures have deteriorated more than the market had anticipated. Earnings | EPS turns positive in the next reported quarter and the subsequent quarter delivers a positive earnings surprise, indicating the large miss was a one-time event rather than a trend. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterPrior quarters showed beats of +2.6%, +17.6%, and an inline result, suggesting the large miss may be an anomaly related to one-time inventory adjustments or restructuring charges rather than a fundamental business deterioration. | ||
The automotive end-market accounts for 51% of ON Semiconductor's revenue, creating concentration risk to the electric vehicle and advanced driver assistance systems demand cycle — a market that has shown significant volatility as EV adoption rates have moderated from peak expectations.
↑ImprovingBear case
- Expectation
- Automotive revenue concentration falls below 45% of total sales within 12 months as industrial and other end-markets grow faster than automotive.
CounterAutomotive semiconductor content per vehicle is structurally growing as electrification and driver assistance systems proliferate, so concentration in automotive may represent a structural tailwind rather than a risk if the technology transition continues.
Free cash flow conversion of 223% relative to net income and a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 — the maximum possible — indicate that ON Semiconductor's financial reporting is conservative and the business generates significantly more cash than its accounting earnings suggest.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow conversion remains above 150% of net income over the next 4 reported quarters, confirming the durable quality of cash generation.
CounterHigh free cash flow relative to earnings in a semiconductor company often reflects large depreciation charges on fabrication facilities that depress GAAP earnings without reducing cash, which is a structural feature rather than an earnings quality advantage.
ON Semiconductor is trading 24% above the analyst consensus price target, creating a negative asymmetry ratio of -1.6 that means the stock offers significantly more downside to consensus than upside from current levels — a fundamental mismatch between current price and analyst-derived fair value.
↑ImprovingWarnings
- Expectation
- Analyst price targets are revised upward by more than 30% within 12 months following a semiconductor cycle recovery that restores automotive and industrial demand.
CounterStocks can trade above analyst targets for extended periods during strong industry cycles, and analyst targets in semiconductors often lag actual earnings potential at cycle peaks when pricing power and utilization rates are both elevated.
The most recent quarter produced a massive earnings miss of -121%, meaning the company reported a loss when analysts expected a profit, which — even if partially explained by one-time charges — signals that demand conditions or cost structures have deteriorated more than the market had anticipated.
↓DeterioratingEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS turns positive in the next reported quarter and the subsequent quarter delivers a positive earnings surprise, indicating the large miss was a one-time event rather than a trend.
CounterPrior quarters showed beats of +2.6%, +17.6%, and an inline result, suggesting the large miss may be an anomaly related to one-time inventory adjustments or restructuring charges rather than a fundamental business deterioration.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.8 |
| ROA | 4.5 |
| Gross margin | 4.6 |
| Op margin | 7.8 |
| Net margin | 5.1 |
| Current ratio | 9.5 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 263% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9
Growth
7.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.8 |
| EPS growth | 9.3 |
Momentum
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 3.1 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 8.6 |
| erm sentiment | 4.9 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 31%
Insider
7.3/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.6 |
| quality rank | 4.8 |
| growth rank | 1.7 |
Technical
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.4 |
| support resistance | 5.9 |
| 52w position | 2.4 |
| gap | 4.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.5 |
| days to cover | 7.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 9.9 |
| implied vol | 3.4 |
| beta | 3.3 |
| debt equity | 7.1 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.6 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.5>=5.5
- ASYMMETRY:1.6>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:82d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.62
Upside
+17.6%
Downside
10.9%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 41 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.02>1.3
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.5>=5.5. Top dim: Insider at 7.3; weakest: Peer rank at 3.6. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.3, Sentiment at 7.2, and Growth at 7.1; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.6, Technical at 4.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.1. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.62 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Automotive Revenue Concentration
Trip ifAutomotive end-market revenue rises above 55% of total revenue for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating concentration risk is increasing rather than diversifying.
- P2Fcf Conversion Piotroski Quality
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 100% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the quality advantage has eroded.
- P3Target Exceeded Negative Asymmetry
Trip ifStock price rises above $140 without analyst target upgrades, pushing the negative asymmetry ratio below -2.0.
- P4Recent Earnings Miss Risk
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -30% for 2 of the next 3 quarters, confirming the large miss was not a one-time event.