Value
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.1 |
| P/S | 7.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.9x
- ▸PEG: 1.72
NTAP · Why this verdict
Why NetApp (NTAP) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
NetApp earns a return on equity of 107%, holds a wide economic moat designation, and is identified as a compounder with strong returns and growth, scoring 7.9 on overall quality and ranking as superior in ROE versus peers. Quality breakdown | Return on equity remains above 70% and wide economic moat designation is maintained over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe extreme ROE of 107% is partially driven by high financial leverage with a debt-to-equity penalty noted in the bear case; if leverage is reduced, reported ROE will mechanically decline. | ||
NetApp has beaten analyst earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 4.9%, demonstrating consistent execution in a competitive infrastructure software market. Catalyst breakdown | Beat rate remains at 4 out of 4 quarters with average positive surprise above 3% over the next four reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterAverage surprise of only 4.9% is modest and suggests estimates are becoming well-calibrated, reducing the probability of meaningful earnings-driven price catalysts going forward. | ||
The momentum gate failed at a score of 3.3, well below the minimum threshold of 4.5, and on-balance volume is falling, confirming that institutional holders are reducing positions, creating near-term price headwind. Warnings | Momentum score recovers above 5.0 and on-balance volume turns to accumulation within 12 months as the business quality attracts renewed buying interest. | →Stable |
| CounterThe stock remains above its 200-day moving average despite the volume distribution, and 13% short interest provides a potential fuel source for a short-squeeze rally if momentum recovers. | ||
NetApp carries a debt-to-equity ratio penalty of 2.0 and the asymmetry ratio is negative at -0.3, meaning the current risk-to-reward structure does not favor new capital allocation at the current price. Bear case | Debt-to-equity ratio declines through free cash flow deployment and the asymmetry ratio turns positive above 1.5 within 12 months as the price pulls back or analyst targets are raised. | →Stable |
| CounterThe company has strong free cash flow conversion at 71% of net income and a 16.8% upside to the resistance price target, suggesting the leverage concern is manageable given cash generation capacity. | ||
NetApp earns a return on equity of 107%, holds a wide economic moat designation, and is identified as a compounder with strong returns and growth, scoring 7.9 on overall quality and ranking as superior in ROE versus peers.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Return on equity remains above 70% and wide economic moat designation is maintained over the next 12 months.
CounterThe extreme ROE of 107% is partially driven by high financial leverage with a debt-to-equity penalty noted in the bear case; if leverage is reduced, reported ROE will mechanically decline.
NetApp has beaten analyst earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 4.9%, demonstrating consistent execution in a competitive infrastructure software market.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Beat rate remains at 4 out of 4 quarters with average positive surprise above 3% over the next four reporting periods.
CounterAverage surprise of only 4.9% is modest and suggests estimates are becoming well-calibrated, reducing the probability of meaningful earnings-driven price catalysts going forward.
The momentum gate failed at a score of 3.3, well below the minimum threshold of 4.5, and on-balance volume is falling, confirming that institutional holders are reducing positions, creating near-term price headwind.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Momentum score recovers above 5.0 and on-balance volume turns to accumulation within 12 months as the business quality attracts renewed buying interest.
CounterThe stock remains above its 200-day moving average despite the volume distribution, and 13% short interest provides a potential fuel source for a short-squeeze rally if momentum recovers.
NetApp carries a debt-to-equity ratio penalty of 2.0 and the asymmetry ratio is negative at -0.3, meaning the current risk-to-reward structure does not favor new capital allocation at the current price.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Debt-to-equity ratio declines through free cash flow deployment and the asymmetry ratio turns positive above 1.5 within 12 months as the price pulls back or analyst targets are raised.
CounterThe company has strong free cash flow conversion at 71% of net income and a 16.8% upside to the resistance price target, suggesting the leverage concern is manageable given cash generation capacity.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
NetApp is a high-quality infrastructure software company with a return on equity of 107%, a perfect 4-quarter earnings beat streak, and a wide economic moat, but is currently experiencing temporary negative price momentum with a confirmed momentum gate failure and a negative asymmetry ratio, making timing the entry the primary challenge.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 6.5 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 9.2 |
| Current ratio | 5.3 |
| FCF quality | 7.1 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Rule of 40 | 5.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 107%
- ▸Strong margins: 18%
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
Growth
6.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.6 |
| EPS growth | 6.7 |
Momentum
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.7 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.9 |
- ▸Uptrend pullback (RSI 38) - buy opportunity
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.3 |
| Price target | 7.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
3.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $9,390,596 (0.031% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.4/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.4 |
| quality rank | 8.5 |
| growth rank | 3.7 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.3 |
| support resistance | 8.4 |
| 52w position | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.9 |
| days to cover | 6.6 |
| volatility | 2.2 |
| put call | 7.1 |
| implied vol | 3.7 |
| beta | 5.3 |
| debt equity | 3.0 |
Catalyst
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.9 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
- ▸Dividend: 133.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:4.9>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:62d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
- MOMENTUM:4.9<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
0.31
Upside
+2.6%
Downside
8.2%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.43>1.3
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.31 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.9, Technical at 7.2, and Sentiment at 6.6; the weakest are Insider at 3.9, Peer rank at 4.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.31 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Exceptional Roe Wide Moat
Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 50% for 2 consecutive quarters or the wide moat designation is removed.
- P2Perfect Earnings Beat Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
- P3Momentum Gate Failure Distribution
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 2.0 or on-balance volume declines by more than 30% from current levels.
- P4Leverage Negative Asymmetry
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio rises above 2.5 or stock price falls below $145.