two major customers
“10-K Item 1: 'Sales to two of our major customers accounted for 43% of our net revenues in fiscal 2026'”
Updated
The most significant concentration NetApp discloses is two major customers at 43%, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: NetApp’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Sales to two of our major customers accounted for 43% of our net revenues in fiscal 2026'”
The company's disclosed concentration is on the customer side, where sales to two of its major customers accounted for 43% of net revenues in fiscal 2026. By disclosed size this is a medium-share concentration, and the character is dependency: the business is not reliant on a broad and interchangeable buyer base but rather on the purchasing decisions of a small number of large accounts. A loss of, or a significant order reduction from, either of these two relationships would affect a meaningful portion of net revenues. The filing does not name the two customers, so the idiosyncratic risk cannot be benchmarked against specific counterparty credit quality or strategic trajectory. What is clear is that the dependency is bifurcated across two accounts rather than concentrated in a single buyer, which provides some protection against a single-customer shock — but the combined 43% share still represents a material portion of the top line. There is no disclosed geographic, supplier, or product concentration layered on top of this customer dependency. On balance, the concentration profile is limited and manageable, with a medium-share customer exposure as the primary variable to watch. Investors should track the durability of these two key customer relationships — particularly any signs of customer consolidation, vendor diversification, or technology platform shifts — as the most direct read on near-term revenue stability.
For the engine’s reasoning on NTAP’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPN | Appian Corporation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| AVPT | AvePoint, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ATEN | A10 Networks, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| NTAP● | NetApp, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ACIW | ACI Worldwide, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AKAM | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.