Value
6.4/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 6.3 |
| p ocf | 7.9 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸P/OCF: 11.9x (FFO proxy — REITs gated off P/E)
LADR · Why this verdict
Why Ladder Capital (LADR) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Three momentum and trend gates have failed simultaneously: the momentum score of 3.1 falls below the required 4.5 threshold, the asymmetry ratio at spot is below the 1.5 minimum, and a death cross has triggered a hard block on new entry—together representing a technically broken price structure that argues against accumulation. Engine gate (failed) | The technical picture would need to recover with the momentum score crossing above 5.0 and the death cross resolving (50-day moving average crossing back above the 200-day) before this pillar is falsified. | →Stable |
| CounterThe stock is only about 2.2% below its 200-day moving average, and the data notes it is too early to call a confirmed breakdown; a shallow, brief decline near the moving average is not the same as a structural trend reversal. | ||
Despite weak price momentum, the business carries a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 and strong net margins near 25%, suggesting that the underlying financial health is sound and that the current technical weakness may not reflect a deterioration in business fundamentals. Quality breakdown | This quality anchor holds if the Piotroski F-Score stays at or above 7 out of 9 and net margins remain above 20% for the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterFor a mortgage REIT, margin strength is heavily influenced by the interest-rate and credit environment; if conditions shift unfavorably, margins can compress quickly and the Piotroski score would likely fall alongside credit quality. | ||
The stock sits about 6% below the analyst take-profit level of $10.72—a gap the bear case itself characterizes as a thin upside margin—leaving little room for price appreciation relative to the uncertainty in the current technical environment. Bear case | The upside case improves materially if the analyst consensus target is revised upward above $11.40, expanding potential gain to more than 12%. | →Stable |
| CounterThe reward-to-risk ratio of approximately 1.7-to-1 at the current price structure is technically favorable; investors already holding at a lower cost basis face much better entry geometry, and 6% appreciation can close organically if the fundamentals hold. | ||
The dividend as a percentage of reported earnings stands at approximately 910%, meaning distributions significantly exceed reported net income; a dividend safety score of only 5.2 out of 10 reflects limited confidence that the payout is sustainable at current levels from an earnings standpoint. Catalyst breakdown | The coverage concern diminishes if the payout ratio relative to reported earnings falls below 200% for 2 consecutive quarters, implying earnings have caught up with distributions. | →Stable |
| CounterThe price-to-cash-flow multiple of 12.0 times suggests operating cash generation may support distributions more comfortably than the earnings-based ratio implies; if cash flows hold up, the reported-earnings gap may overstate the actual coverage risk. | ||
Three momentum and trend gates have failed simultaneously: the momentum score of 3.1 falls below the required 4.5 threshold, the asymmetry ratio at spot is below the 1.5 minimum, and a death cross has triggered a hard block on new entry—together representing a technically broken price structure that argues against accumulation.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- The technical picture would need to recover with the momentum score crossing above 5.0 and the death cross resolving (50-day moving average crossing back above the 200-day) before this pillar is falsified.
CounterThe stock is only about 2.2% below its 200-day moving average, and the data notes it is too early to call a confirmed breakdown; a shallow, brief decline near the moving average is not the same as a structural trend reversal.
Despite weak price momentum, the business carries a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 and strong net margins near 25%, suggesting that the underlying financial health is sound and that the current technical weakness may not reflect a deterioration in business fundamentals.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- This quality anchor holds if the Piotroski F-Score stays at or above 7 out of 9 and net margins remain above 20% for the next 4 quarters.
CounterFor a mortgage REIT, margin strength is heavily influenced by the interest-rate and credit environment; if conditions shift unfavorably, margins can compress quickly and the Piotroski score would likely fall alongside credit quality.
The stock sits about 6% below the analyst take-profit level of $10.72—a gap the bear case itself characterizes as a thin upside margin—leaving little room for price appreciation relative to the uncertainty in the current technical environment.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- The upside case improves materially if the analyst consensus target is revised upward above $11.40, expanding potential gain to more than 12%.
CounterThe reward-to-risk ratio of approximately 1.7-to-1 at the current price structure is technically favorable; investors already holding at a lower cost basis face much better entry geometry, and 6% appreciation can close organically if the fundamentals hold.
The dividend as a percentage of reported earnings stands at approximately 910%, meaning distributions significantly exceed reported net income; a dividend safety score of only 5.2 out of 10 reflects limited confidence that the payout is sustainable at current levels from an earnings standpoint.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- The coverage concern diminishes if the payout ratio relative to reported earnings falls below 200% for 2 consecutive quarters, implying earnings have caught up with distributions.
CounterThe price-to-cash-flow multiple of 12.0 times suggests operating cash generation may support distributions more comfortably than the earnings-based ratio implies; if cash flows hold up, the reported-earnings gap may overstate the actual coverage risk.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Ladder Capital is in a hold-no-new-entry phase: a death cross hard block and momentum failure eliminate new entry, and just 6% upside to the analyst target leaves a thin margin for reward; the business shows genuine underlying strength in its Piotroski score and margins, but the technical backdrop and negative price momentum need to resolve before this becomes actionable.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.2 |
| ROA | 0.7 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 2.4 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.9 |
| Moat | 5.2 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong margins: 25%
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
6.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.9 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
3.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.5 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA (recent, shallow — too early to call)
Sentiment
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 23%
Insider
3.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $358,925 (0.028% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.4/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.1 |
| quality rank | 2.9 |
| growth rank | 3.8 |
Technical
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.0 |
| support resistance | 4.9 |
| 52w position | 8.3 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.5 |
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 8.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 7.0 |
| debt equity | 2.2 |
- ▸High IV: 89%
Catalyst
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.4 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Dividend: 919.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:19d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:3.9<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
1.42
Upside
+7.1%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 57
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.3B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 6.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.9<4.5, ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.42 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 6.5, Value at 6.4, and Sentiment at 6.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.4, Insider at 3.9, and Momentum at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.42 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Momentum Death Cross Hard Block
Trip ifMomentum score recovers above 5.0 and the 50-day moving average crosses back above the 200-day moving average.
- P2Strong Piotroski And Margins
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 out of 9 or net margin falls below 15% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Thin Upside Margin To Target
Trip ifAnalyst consensus take-profit target rises above $11.40, expanding upside headroom beyond 12%.
- P4Dividend Payout Coverage Concern
Trip ifDividend payout ratio relative to reported earnings falls below 200% for 2 consecutive quarters.