Skip to main content
HAYWHayward Holdings, Inc.Hold5.6·$15.99+1.46%
HAYW · Why this verdict

Why Hayward Holdings (HAYW) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Hayward Holdings is in a confirmed technical downtrend — below its 200-day moving average with a death cross and falling volume accumulation — while free cash flow stands at only 20% of net income and 85% geographic concentration in North America leaves limited diversification against domestic demand softness; with only 3.4% upside to the analyst target and unfavorable risk-reward, the setup does not favor new exposure, though improving MACD and RSI at 61 suggest early technical stabilization may be developing.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

With 85% of revenue tied to the North American segment, the business is highly exposed to domestic demand cycles with limited international revenue to buffer regional downturns — a concentration that amplifies both the upside in a strong domestic environment and the downside in a softer one.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
North American segment revenue share declines below 70% as international operations grow to provide meaningful diversification.

CounterDeep North American market presence can represent a durable competitive position in a large addressable market; geographic concentration is only a structural disadvantage if domestic demand deteriorates, which remains a conditional rather than certain outcome.

A death cross pattern combined with a 200-day moving average slope of -1.3% over 30 days and falling volume accumulation (declining OBV) describes a confirmed downtrend where sellers are in control — a condition that acts as a hard block on adding exposure at the current level.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price reclaims the 200-day moving average, OBV turns positive, and the MA slope turns flat or positive over the next 12 weeks.

CounterRSI at 61 and an improving MACD suggest internal momentum is strengthening even as the primary trend remains negative — early signs that a recovery may be building from the current range despite the adverse longer-term trend signal.

Free cash flow stands at only 20% of net income — a significant gap flagged as a red flag for earnings quality; when cash generated by the business is substantially below what is reported in income, the income statement may be overstating the sustainable level of profitability.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
FCF/NI ratio improves above 60% over the next 2 fiscal years as working capital or capital investment normalizes.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 signals broad financial health across multiple dimensions, indicating the low FCF/NI ratio may reflect timing effects rather than a structural earnings quality deficiency.

Despite the primary downtrend, the setup has been characterized as a potential recovery — with MACD improving and RSI at 61 — suggesting the preconditions for a technical inflection may be forming even though the primary trend has not yet confirmed a reversal.

Stable
V9
Expectation
Price breaks above $15.50 and sustains above it for 3 consecutive weeks while OBV turns positive.

CounterA death cross is a hard technical block that historically overrides early-stage MACD improvement; a failed recovery attempt following a death cross can accelerate selling as technical participants exit on the second signal failure.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E6.0
P/S8.3
EV/EBITDA3.6
Fwd P/E7.5
PEG4.7
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 16.5x
  • PEG: 1.80

Quality

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.5
ROA3.3
Gross margin5.6
Op margin6.7
Net margin7.0
Current ratio9.7
FCF quality1.6
Moat6.4
Piotroski F8.9
  • Earnings quality RED FLAG: 20% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

7.7/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth5.4
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.4
MACD9.8
OBV1.0
MA position8.0
Volume0.0
  • Overbought (RSI 71)
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating6.8
Price target6.2
erm sentiment5.0
  • Light analyst coverage (8.0) — signal dampened

Insider

4.4/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction3.5
holder change5.1
  • Modest insider selling — $2,160,448 (0.063% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.1
quality rank5.5
growth rank3.3

Technical

2.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.1
52w position8.0

Risk (lower is worse)

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.2
days to cover7.2
volatility4.5
put call10.0
implied vol4.9
max pain risk3.0
beta6.5
debt equity7.2
  • Above max pain $5
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg7.8

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:4.6>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:32d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:4.6<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.40
Upside
-5.8%
Downside
14.7%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRECOVERY Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 71

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE MCap $3.4B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:4.6>=4.5. Top dim: Growth at 7.7; weakest: Technical at 2.7. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 7.7, Catalyst at 7.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.3; the weakest are Technical at 2.7, Peer rank at 4.0, and Insider at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.40 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1A death cross pattern combined with a 200-day moving average slope of -1.3% over 30 days and falling volume accumulation (declining OBV) describes a confirmed downtrend where sellers are in control — a condition that acts as a hard block on adding exposure at the current level.

    Trip ifPrice rises above $16.00 and holds above it for 3 consecutive weeks while OBV turns positive.

  • P2Free cash flow stands at only 20% of net income — a significant gap flagged as a red flag for earnings quality; when cash generated by the business is substantially below what is reported in income, the income statement may be overstating the sustainable level of profitability.

    Trip ifFCF/NI ratio rises above 60% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3With 85% of revenue tied to the North American segment, the business is highly exposed to domestic demand cycles with limited international revenue to buffer regional downturns — a concentration that amplifies both the upside in a strong domestic environment and the downside in a softer one.

    Trip ifNorth American segment revenue share falls below 70% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Despite the primary downtrend, the setup has been characterized as a potential recovery — with MACD improving and RSI at 61 — suggesting the preconditions for a technical inflection may be forming even though the primary trend has not yet confirmed a reversal.

    Trip ifPrice falls below $13.00 on rising volume for 2 consecutive weeks, confirming the recovery attempt has failed.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks HAYW Why this verdict