Value
6.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.9 |
| PEG | 8.3 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸PEG: 0.79
VSAT · Why this verdict
Why ViaSat (VSAT) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Analysts assign a 35% upside target to $77.32 from the current $65.87, with an LLM news sentiment score of +0.64 based on 5 news articles, but the business quality score of 3.0 — below the 4.0 minimum threshold — reflects near-zero net margins and no established competitive moat. Sentiment breakdown | Analyst price targets should be maintained or raised above $75 over the next 12 months as the company demonstrates improving margins, reducing the quality gap that currently prevents this from being a buy recommendation. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh analyst targets on low-quality businesses frequently reflect speculative upside scenarios rather than base-case outcomes, and the 17.4% current upside to analyst target suggests the expected value is already partially embedded in the price. | ||
Despite the low overall quality score, ViaSat achieves a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 — measuring financial health across 9 accounting-based dimensions — indicating the balance sheet and fundamental business mechanics are sound even if profitability metrics are weak. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score should remain at 7 or above over the next 12 months, confirming that the structural financial health is maintained even as profitability improves. | →Stable |
| CounterA high Piotroski score combined with near-zero net margins and no free cash flow suggests the business is operationally functional but not yet profitable enough to reward equity investors, and the score cannot prevent continued stock underperformance. | ||
Despite the most recent quarter missing badly at -106% surprise (Q1 2026), the 3 preceding quarters averaged massive beats of 228%, 250%, and 1,800% respectively, reflecting a business where earnings are highly volatile and can swing dramatically in either direction. Earnings | At least 3 of the next 4 quarters should show positive earnings surprises above 0%, returning to the beat pattern that characterized the 12 months prior to the most recent miss. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent miss of -106% in May 2026 reporting actual EPS of -$0.02 versus expected $0.32 suggests the business has deteriorated materially rather than simply missing a quarterly estimate, and the prior beats may not be indicative of the current trajectory. | ||
The put/call ratio of 2.17 indicates bearish options positioning, with implied volatility at 129%, reflecting significant market uncertainty about the company's near-term trajectory following the most recent earnings miss. Key risks | The put/call ratio should decline below 1.5 within 6 months as the earnings recovery restores investor confidence and reduces demand for put protection. | →Stable |
| CounterA put/call ratio of 2.17 combined with 129% implied volatility in a company that just missed by -106% is a rational bearish signal, not a contrarian opportunity; options markets may be correctly pricing a higher probability of continued earnings misses. | ||
Analysts assign a 35% upside target to $77.32 from the current $65.87, with an LLM news sentiment score of +0.64 based on 5 news articles, but the business quality score of 3.0 — below the 4.0 minimum threshold — reflects near-zero net margins and no established competitive moat.
→StableSentiment breakdown
- Expectation
- Analyst price targets should be maintained or raised above $75 over the next 12 months as the company demonstrates improving margins, reducing the quality gap that currently prevents this from being a buy recommendation.
CounterHigh analyst targets on low-quality businesses frequently reflect speculative upside scenarios rather than base-case outcomes, and the 17.4% current upside to analyst target suggests the expected value is already partially embedded in the price.
Despite the low overall quality score, ViaSat achieves a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 — measuring financial health across 9 accounting-based dimensions — indicating the balance sheet and fundamental business mechanics are sound even if profitability metrics are weak.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The Piotroski F-Score should remain at 7 or above over the next 12 months, confirming that the structural financial health is maintained even as profitability improves.
CounterA high Piotroski score combined with near-zero net margins and no free cash flow suggests the business is operationally functional but not yet profitable enough to reward equity investors, and the score cannot prevent continued stock underperformance.
Despite the most recent quarter missing badly at -106% surprise (Q1 2026), the 3 preceding quarters averaged massive beats of 228%, 250%, and 1,800% respectively, reflecting a business where earnings are highly volatile and can swing dramatically in either direction.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- At least 3 of the next 4 quarters should show positive earnings surprises above 0%, returning to the beat pattern that characterized the 12 months prior to the most recent miss.
CounterThe most recent miss of -106% in May 2026 reporting actual EPS of -$0.02 versus expected $0.32 suggests the business has deteriorated materially rather than simply missing a quarterly estimate, and the prior beats may not be indicative of the current trajectory.
The put/call ratio of 2.17 indicates bearish options positioning, with implied volatility at 129%, reflecting significant market uncertainty about the company's near-term trajectory following the most recent earnings miss.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- The put/call ratio should decline below 1.5 within 6 months as the earnings recovery restores investor confidence and reduces demand for put protection.
CounterA put/call ratio of 2.17 combined with 129% implied volatility in a company that just missed by -106% is a rational bearish signal, not a contrarian opportunity; options markets may be correctly pricing a higher probability of continued earnings misses.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
ViaSat is a satellite communication equipment company with 35% analyst upside to a target of $77.32, a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, and strong earnings beats in 3 of 4 quarters, but the business fails the quality threshold with a score of 3.0, generating near-zero net margins and no competitive moat, making it a speculative recovery thesis rather than a quality investment.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.3 |
| Gross margin | 2.6 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.2 |
| Moat | 3.8 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
6.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.5 |
| Analyst rating | 6.9 |
| Price target | 7.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (9.0) — signal dampened
Insider
3.4/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Notable insider selling — $30,525,999 (0.269% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
2.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.5 |
| quality rank | 2.8 |
| growth rank | 2.2 |
Technical
3.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.7 |
| support resistance | 2.9 |
| 52w position | 7.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.8 |
| days to cover | 7.2 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 2.3 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 4.3 |
| debt equity | 4.1 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 1.65
- ▸High IV: 102%
Catalyst
6.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:7.2>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.06
Upside
-1.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 60, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.72>1.3
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 7.2 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.2, Sentiment at 6.8, and Growth at 6.5; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.9, Quality at 3.0, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.06 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Analyst Upside With Quality Gap
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $60, more than 9% below the current price of $65.87.
- P2Piotroski Score Structural Health
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6, indicating deterioration in at least 3 of the 9 financial health dimensions.
- P3Earnings Beat Volatile Record
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters.
- P4Elevated Put Call Bearish Options
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 3.0 and remains above 3.0 for more than 30 consecutive days.