Skip to main content
UNPUnion Pacific CorporationBuy Wait5.6·$301.96+3.21%
UNP · Why this verdict

Why Union Pacific (UNP) is rated BUY WAIT

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Union Pacific delivers 41% ROE, 29% operating margins, and ranks best-in-class on both return and margin metrics within the railroad peer group, with a 3-out-of-4 earnings beat streak, but trades near analyst resistance with negative asymmetry and a PEG of 3.26 suggesting the quality is already fully priced in.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Union Pacific generates 41% return on equity and 29% operating margins — the highest in its railroad peer group — and ranks at the top on both quality and margins with peer quality rank of 8.75 out of 10, reflecting a highly efficient freight railroad operation.

Stable
Peer-rank breakdown
Expectation
ROE stays above 35% and operating margins remain above 25% for the next 4 reported quarters, sustaining the best-in-class competitive position

CounterFree cash flow represents only 56% of net income, flagged as an earnings quality warning, and the PEG of 3.26 means investors are paying a steep premium for the quality — leaving limited room for disappointment

Union Pacific has beaten earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 2.3%, demonstrating steady and reliable execution against analyst expectations — appropriate for a large-cap infrastructure railroad business.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beats continue in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters and the average positive surprise stays above 2%

CounterThe one miss in the last four quarters was only -0.35%, suggesting the beat/miss pattern is very narrow and highly sensitive to small changes in volume, pricing, or fuel costs

Union Pacific at $267.32 is within 2% of the resistance take-profit level of $272.69, with an asymmetry ratio of -0.34 and negative upside, meaning there is no favorable risk-reward entry at current prices despite the strong underlying business quality.

TrippedStable
Targets
Expectation
Price corrects below $253, more than 5% below the current $267.32, restoring positive upside to analyst targets and an asymmetry ratio above 1.5

CounterThe stock is trading above its 200-day moving average with volume accumulation, and strong quality fundamentals can support a price that appears to have limited near-term upside in a range-bound setup

A PEG ratio of 3.26 and forward P/E of 19.5x indicate the stock is trading at a significant premium to its growth rate, meaning the market has already priced in the quality advantage and sustained earnings delivery is required just to maintain the current valuation.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
PEG ratio falls below 2.5 within 12 months through either earnings growth acceleration or a price correction that expands forward-looking value

CounterBest-in-class quality businesses in infrastructure sectors routinely command PEG premiums above 3.0x because of the scarcity of high-quality, durable railroad assets — the premium may be structurally justified

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.3
P/S5.5
EV/EBITDA2.2
Fwd P/E6.1
PEG3.4
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 21.1x
  • PEG: 3.55

Quality

7.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA6.1
Gross margin7.3
Op margin10.0
Net margin10.0
Current ratio3.7
FCF quality4.4
Moat6.4
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent ROE: 41%
  • Strong margins: 29%
  • Earnings quality warning: 56% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

3.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.3
EPS growth3.2

Momentum

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.3
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume10.0
vol acceleration8.9
  • Overbought (RSI 74)
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA
  • Volume surge (2.5x avg) on up move

Sentiment

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.7
Analyst rating7.5
Price target5.1
  • LLM news sentiment: +0.54 (n=5)

Insider

7.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Insider selling (low materiality) — $8,781,595 (0.005% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.8
quality rank8.9
growth rank6.7
  • Superior ROE vs peers
  • Best-in-class margins

Technical

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.6
support resistance2.2
52w position9.3
gap3.0
  • Extreme gap up (5.9%) - may pull back

Risk (lower is worse)

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.3
days to cover0.0
volatility7.2
put call6.8
implied vol5.5
max pain risk3.0
beta7.2
debt equity3.8
news risk5.5
  • Above max pain $235

Catalyst

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.6
dividend safety4.8
news activity8.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Earnings in 0 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Earnings in 0 days. Wait until post-earnings.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L3:NEWS_BLOCK|ENTRY_STICKY:PRIOR_STILL_VIABLE
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:7.2>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_BOOST:EARNINGS:0.80
  • NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.70
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:0d<=7d
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.67
Upside
-9.3%
Downside
13.9%
Sizing output
STARTER

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate Balanced profile

Investment implication

A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Earnings in 0 days. Wait until post-earnings. The 10-dimension scores remain Quality at 7.3 (strongest), but ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.3, Insider at 7.3, and Momentum at 7.2; the weakest are Growth at 3.2, Technical at 3.8, and Value at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.67 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Best In Class Roe And Margins

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 22% or ROE drops below 30% for 2 consecutive quarters

  • P2Earnings Beat Streak Consistency

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -5% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, ending the beat pattern

  • P3Price At Resistance Negative AsymmetryTripped

    Trip ifPrice rises above $275, more than 2% above the current $267.32, further exceeding resistance without analyst target revision

  • P4Rich Valuation Peg Above Three

    Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 4.0 without a corresponding increase in earnings growth rate

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks UNP Why this verdict