Value
4.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 5.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.9 |
| PEG | 3.4 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 25.6x
- ▸PEG: 3.56
TTWO · Why this verdict
Why Take-Two Interactive Software, (TTWO) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Despite GAAP operating losses, the company generates 22% free cash flow margins and 3.6% FCF yield, demonstrating that cash generation from existing games and recurring revenue streams is substantially better than reported earnings suggest. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin remains above 15% over the next 12 months, confirming the underlying cash generation is durable. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh FCF margins in gaming can reflect under-investment in new titles; if the company needs to increase development spending for future launches, free cash flow could compress sharply. | ||
Five franchises generate 54.3% of total sales and the top five customers account for 80.6% of revenue, creating extreme concentration that means a single underperforming title launch or the loss of a platform relationship could swing results dramatically. Bear case | Revenue from the top 5 franchises falls below 45% of total sales over the next 2 fiscal years as the catalog diversifies. | →Stable |
| CounterMega-franchise concentration in gaming is normal; Grand Theft Auto-level titles generate recurring monetization for years after launch and justify higher revenue concentration than typical media companies. | ||
The stock has triggered a death cross with the 200-day moving average slope flat and price at the lower end of its range, while the put/call ratio of 1.81 indicates more bearish than bullish options positioning, reflecting broad uncertainty about the timing of the next major title release. Momentum breakdown | The stock rises above its 200-day moving average on sustained volume within the next 5 months, signaling a trend reversal. | →Stable |
| CounterGaming stocks often trade sideways for extended periods between major title launches, and a flat 200-day slope is less severe than a sharply declining one. | ||
Analysts see 29% upside to $251.19, but the company has missed earnings in 2 of the last 4 quarters with the worst miss at negative 87%, creating a pattern of high analyst optimism that has not been consistently validated by reported results. Sentiment | The company delivers positive earnings surprises in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, narrowing the gap between analyst targets and fundamental reality. | →Stable |
| CounterThe two beat quarters showed very large positive surprises of 38% and 128%, suggesting that when the company executes, it does so decisively and could re-rate quickly on a successful title launch. | ||
Despite GAAP operating losses, the company generates 22% free cash flow margins and 3.6% FCF yield, demonstrating that cash generation from existing games and recurring revenue streams is substantially better than reported earnings suggest.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow margin remains above 15% over the next 12 months, confirming the underlying cash generation is durable.
CounterHigh FCF margins in gaming can reflect under-investment in new titles; if the company needs to increase development spending for future launches, free cash flow could compress sharply.
Five franchises generate 54.3% of total sales and the top five customers account for 80.6% of revenue, creating extreme concentration that means a single underperforming title launch or the loss of a platform relationship could swing results dramatically.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue from the top 5 franchises falls below 45% of total sales over the next 2 fiscal years as the catalog diversifies.
CounterMega-franchise concentration in gaming is normal; Grand Theft Auto-level titles generate recurring monetization for years after launch and justify higher revenue concentration than typical media companies.
The stock has triggered a death cross with the 200-day moving average slope flat and price at the lower end of its range, while the put/call ratio of 1.81 indicates more bearish than bullish options positioning, reflecting broad uncertainty about the timing of the next major title release.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- The stock rises above its 200-day moving average on sustained volume within the next 5 months, signaling a trend reversal.
CounterGaming stocks often trade sideways for extended periods between major title launches, and a flat 200-day slope is less severe than a sharply declining one.
Analysts see 29% upside to $251.19, but the company has missed earnings in 2 of the last 4 quarters with the worst miss at negative 87%, creating a pattern of high analyst optimism that has not been consistently validated by reported results.
→StableSentiment
- Expectation
- The company delivers positive earnings surprises in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, narrowing the gap between analyst targets and fundamental reality.
CounterThe two beat quarters showed very large positive surprises of 38% and 128%, suggesting that when the company executes, it does so decisively and could re-rate quickly on a successful title launch.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Take-Two Interactive faces a death cross downtrend and below-floor business quality, with top five customers accounting for 80.6% of revenue and five franchises generating 54.3% of sales, though analysts see 29% upside and the company generates 22% free cash flow margins.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 7.5 |
| Op margin | 0.9 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 6.0 |
| Moat | 5.1 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸FCF-positive but moderate margins (FCF margin 22%, FCF yield 3.1%)
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
4.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.0 |
Momentum
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.7 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 0.9 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 86)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 86 (late-cycle distribution risk)
Sentiment
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.0 |
| Analyst rating | 9.0 |
| Price target | 6.3 |
Insider
3.4/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Notable insider selling — $135,284,529 (0.286% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
1.1/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.4 |
| quality rank | 1.4 |
| growth rank | 1.4 |
Technical
3.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.0 |
| support resistance | 0.0 |
| 52w position | 9.5 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.5 |
| days to cover | 7.7 |
| volatility | 3.0 |
| put call | 4.7 |
| implied vol | 4.3 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 7.2 |
| debt equity | 5.9 |
- ▸Above max pain $125
- ▸Concentration risks: 3 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
7.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.4>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.70
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:36d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.4>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
-0.12
Upside
-1.8%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 86
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Catalyst at 7.6 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 7.6, Sentiment at 7.2, and Momentum at 6.4; the weakest are Peer rank at 1.1, Quality at 3.2, and Insider at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.12 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Franchise Customer Concentration
Trip ifRevenue from top 5 franchises rises above 60% of total sales in any reported period.
- P2Death Cross Negative Momentum
Trip ifStock price drops below $195, more than 9% below the current $216.23, accelerating the downtrend.
- P3Fcf Quality Amid Gaap Losses
Trip ifFree cash flow margin falls below 10% for at least 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Analyst Upside Vs Earnings Miss Risk
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters.