Value
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.6 |
| P/S | 0.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.9 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 37.5x
- ▸PEG: 1.69
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue grew 87% year-over-year, placing Teradyne as an industry growth leader in semiconductor equipment — a rate that reflects either significant market share gains, end-market demand recovery, or both, and positions the company in the top percentile of peers on the growth dimension. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth stays above 30% year-over-year in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters as the semiconductor equipment cycle sustains elevated demand. | →Stable |
| Counter87% revenue growth in semiconductor equipment is highly cyclical and driven by the current AI-infrastructure spending wave; the geographic concentration of 89% of revenues outside the United States creates tariff, currency, and geopolitical risk to future quarters. | ||
89% of Teradyne's revenues are generated outside the United States, representing the highest geographic concentration risk in this set — creating significant exposure to export controls, tariff regimes, and geopolitical disruption in Asia-Pacific semiconductor supply chains. Bear case | Revenue from regions outside the United States remains stable with no quarter showing a year-over-year decline of more than 10% due to export restrictions or tariff disruption. | →Stable |
| CounterGlobal semiconductor equipment markets are inherently international; Teradyne's geographic footprint reflects its customer base in leading-edge chip manufacturing in Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan rather than a structural vulnerability. | ||
Teradyne earns a wide economic moat designation, achieves 29% return on equity, earns 23% net margins, and holds a Piotroski financial health score of 7 out of 9 — a combination that qualifies it as compounder-quality with durable competitive advantages in semiconductor test equipment. Quality breakdown | Return on equity stays above 20% and net margins remain above 18% over the next four reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow represents only 35% of net income — flagged as a red flag for earnings quality — meaning the high GAAP margins are not fully converting to cash, which raises questions about working capital, inventory, or capital expenditure requirements for this equipment cycle. | ||
At $432 per share and a forward price-to-earnings of 45.5 times, Teradyne is trading approximately 22% above the analyst consensus price target — the negative asymmetry ratio of negative 1.5 indicates the current price already exceeds what fundamental analysis justifies at current earnings estimates. Targets | Analyst consensus target rises above $500, more than 16% above the current $432.41 price, following continued strong earnings delivery and sustained semiconductor equipment demand. | →Stable |
| CounterMarket leaders in high-barrier semiconductor equipment markets can sustain premium valuations for extended periods when structural demand drivers — such as AI chip scaling — create multi-year investment cycles; a 45.5 times forward price-to-earnings may prove reasonable if earnings power continues to expand. | ||
Counter87% revenue growth in semiconductor equipment is highly cyclical and driven by the current AI-infrastructure spending wave; the geographic concentration of 89% of revenues outside the United States creates tariff, currency, and geopolitical risk to future quarters.
CounterGlobal semiconductor equipment markets are inherently international; Teradyne's geographic footprint reflects its customer base in leading-edge chip manufacturing in Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan rather than a structural vulnerability.
CounterFree cash flow represents only 35% of net income — flagged as a red flag for earnings quality — meaning the high GAAP margins are not fully converting to cash, which raises questions about working capital, inventory, or capital expenditure requirements for this equipment cycle.
CounterMarket leaders in high-barrier semiconductor equipment markets can sustain premium valuations for extended periods when structural demand drivers — such as AI chip scaling — create multi-year investment cycles; a 45.5 times forward price-to-earnings may prove reasonable if earnings power continues to expand.
Teradyne has achieved 87% revenue growth year-over-year, holds a wide economic moat with a Piotroski financial health score of 7 out of 9 and 29% return on equity, and receives strongly positive news sentiment — but at $432 per share the stock trades 22% above the analyst consensus target with a forward price-to-earnings of 45.5 times, and free cash flow represents only 35% of net income.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.6 |
| P/S | 0.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.9 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.6 |
| ROA | 10.0 |
| Gross margin | 7.7 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 7.4 |
| FCF quality | 2.8 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 3.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 8.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.4 |
| Price target | 6.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.6 |
| quality rank | 7.8 |
| growth rank | 9.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.9 |
| support resistance | 8.1 |
| 52w position | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.7 |
| days to cover | 8.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 1.5 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 4.0 |
| debt equity | 2.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (8.1) with weak momentum (2.8)
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.79>1.3
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.7 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 10.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.1<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.11 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Quality at 8.1, and Sentiment at 7.4; the weakest are Momentum at 2.8, Value at 2.8, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.11 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifReturn on equity drops below 15% in any reported quarter, more than 14 percentage points below the current 29% level.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% year-over-year in any reported quarter, more than 67 percentage points below the current 87% rate.
Trip ifStock price rises above $500, more than 15% above the current $432.41, without analyst consensus targets rising above $520.
Trip ifRevenue from outside the United States declines by more than 15% year-over-year in any quarter due to export restrictions or geopolitical disruption.