Power
“10-K Item 1: 'Power| | 56.9 | %'”
Updated
The most significant concentration STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. S discloses is Power at 56.9%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. S’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Power| | 56.9 | %'”
“10-K Item 1: 'South East| | 57.9 | %'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'We are dependent on Starwood Capital Group, including our Manager and their key personnel'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Multifamily| | 39.3 | %'”
The company's disclosed concentration profile combines property-type exposures, a geographic tilt, and a high-share manager dependency. On the loan portfolio side, the filing discloses two property-type concentrations: Power is the largest disclosed share of the infrastructure lending portfolio, a high-share structural exposure by disclosed band; Multifamily is the second-largest disclosed category, a moderate-share structural exposure reflecting deliberate allocation to residential income properties. Both figures appear only in pipe-delimited table fragments in the source quotes and are therefore described qualitatively rather than cited as specific percentages. The geographic concentration similarly appears in a table format: the South East is the largest disclosed regional exposure in the portfolio, a high-share structural exposure, but the source figure is also pipe-separated and is treated qualitatively per the same constraint. The geographic tilt to the South East means the portfolio's credit quality is tied to regional real estate and infrastructure conditions in that market. The counterparty dependency on Starwood Capital Group is the most explicitly stated risk: the company is dependent on Starwood Capital Group, including its Manager and their key personnel, a high-share dependency exposure. This externally managed structure means that management quality, key-person continuity, and the terms of the management agreement are material to operations in a way that internally managed peers do not face. A deterioration in the manager relationship — through key-person departures, conflict-of-interest concerns, or contract renegotiation — would carry direct operational consequences. On balance, the concentration profile is multi-layered: property-type and geographic structural exposures within the portfolio, with a manager dependency overlaid at the enterprise level.
For the engine’s reasoning on STWD’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STWD● | STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. S | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| ABR | Arbor Realty Trust | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| AGNC | AGNC Investment Corp. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| AGNCM | AGNC Investment Corp. - Deposit | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ARR | ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AGNCN | AGNC Investment Corp. - Deposit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.