Value
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.1 |
| P/S | 7.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.4 |
| PEG | 8.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.83
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow is -1,444% of net income — the most severe cash quality red flag in the scoring model — indicating that Sempra is in an extremely capital-intensive investment phase where cash outflows for infrastructure dwarf reported accounting profits by a factor of roughly 14. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow deficit as a percentage of net income improves toward -500% or better within the next 18 months as large infrastructure projects (likely LNG or utility expansion) move from construction to revenue generation, reducing the cash burn relative to earnings. | →Stable |
| CounterAt -1,444% of net income, the capital expenditure requirement is so large that it likely reflects multi-year infrastructure commitments (LNG facilities, grid expansion) that will not moderate quickly; Sempra may need to issue equity or increase debt to fund this program, diluting existing shareholders. | ||
Sempra has beaten analyst earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 8.9%, including a 21.7% beat in November 2025 and a 9.2% beat in February 2026, demonstrating consistent outperformance of consensus projections for a large diversified utility. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with average surprise above 5%, confirming that the regulatory rate recovery cycle is translating reliably into reportable earnings. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue is declining at -4% year-over-year despite earnings beats, suggesting that regulatory rate increases are offsetting volume declines or that non-recurring items are boosting reported earnings above the underlying run-rate. | ||
Sempra's momentum score of 7.7 out of 10 is strong for a utility, with rising on-balance volume, a positive moving average convergence-divergence reading, and the stock trading above its 200-day moving average, suggesting institutional buyers are net purchasers despite the headline quality concerns. Momentum breakdown | On-balance volume continues rising for at least 6 of the next 12 months and the stock holds above its 200-day moving average, confirming that institutional demand is absorbing any selling pressure from the free-cash-flow concerns. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong price momentum in a utility that has essentially reached its analyst price target (only 1.3% upside remaining) may simply reflect prior buying that is already fully priced in; the asymmetry of 0.25 upside-to-downside implies the market has already recognized the recovery. | ||
Substantially all of Sempra's regulated utility operations are in California and Texas — identified as the primary geographic concentration risk in the bear case — making the company's earnings trajectory highly dependent on the regulatory and legislative environments of those two states. Bear case | Regulatory proceedings in California and Texas result in rate case outcomes allowing at least 8% allowed return on equity over the next 2 annual periods, supporting the earnings beat trajectory. | →Stable |
| CounterCalifornia utility regulation has become increasingly politicized (wildfire liability, rate affordability pressure), and Texas weatherization mandates have increased capital requirements; both regulatory environments are more uncertain than the utility sector average. | ||
CounterAt -1,444% of net income, the capital expenditure requirement is so large that it likely reflects multi-year infrastructure commitments (LNG facilities, grid expansion) that will not moderate quickly; Sempra may need to issue equity or increase debt to fund this program, diluting existing shareholders.
CounterRevenue is declining at -4% year-over-year despite earnings beats, suggesting that regulatory rate increases are offsetting volume declines or that non-recurring items are boosting reported earnings above the underlying run-rate.
CounterStrong price momentum in a utility that has essentially reached its analyst price target (only 1.3% upside remaining) may simply reflect prior buying that is already fully priced in; the asymmetry of 0.25 upside-to-downside implies the market has already recognized the recovery.
CounterCalifornia utility regulation has become increasingly politicized (wildfire liability, rate affordability pressure), and Texas weatherization mandates have increased capital requirements; both regulatory environments are more uncertain than the utility sector average.
DBA Sempra has beaten earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters and displays strong price momentum with rising on-balance volume, but free cash flow is severely negative at -1,444% of net income, it operates at the nexus of California and Texas regulatory environments, and a put-to-call ratio of 2.58 signals elevated hedging activity.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.1 |
| P/S | 7.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.4 |
| PEG | 8.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.9 |
| ROA | 1.2 |
| Gross margin | 4.5 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 7.2 |
| Current ratio | 6.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.5 |
| EPS growth | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.4 |
| Price target | 6.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.8 |
| quality rank | 5.8 |
| growth rank | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.2 |
| support resistance | 2.4 |
| 52w position | 8.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.1 |
| days to cover | 7.9 |
| volatility | 8.1 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.7 |
| beta | 9.6 |
| debt equity | 5.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.9 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 59, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 8.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.1<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.09 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 8.0, Sentiment at 6.5, and Catalyst at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 3.1, Peer rank at 3.3, and Technical at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.09 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below -5% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, indicating that the execution pattern is deteriorating as capital costs or regulatory delays impact reported results.
Trip ifFree cash flow deficit worsens to more than -2,000% of net income in any reported quarter, indicating that capital expenditures are accelerating further beyond manageable levels.
Trip ifOn-balance volume falls below its 90-day moving average for more than 8 consecutive weeks, indicating institutional sellers are beginning to distribute positions.
Trip ifA regulatory rate case in California or Texas results in an allowed return on equity below 7%, more than 1 percentage point below sector benchmarks, signaling unfavorable regulatory outcomes.