Skip to main content
SREDBA SempraSell5.1·$94.27+0.90%
SRE · Concentration risk · 10-K extracted

DBA Sempra (SRE) concentration risks

Updated

The most significant concentration DBA Sempra discloses is California and Texas regulated utilities, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

Source: DBA Sempra’s SEC Form 10-K filed view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗

At a glance

Disclosed-size breakdown · 2 disclosed concentrations

HIGH1
MEDIUM1
LOW0
Disclosed concentrations

Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).

HIGHBuilt-inGeographic

California and Texas regulated utilities

10-K Item 1: 'principal businesses are regulated utilities in California and Texas'
SEC 10-K · filed Feb 2026
MEDIUMBuilt-inRegulatory

CPUC

10-K Item 1: 'subject to a biennial administrative staff review by the CPUC'
SEC 10-K · filed Feb 2026
TrendMatrix Research · concentration synthesis

What these concentrations mean together

updated 2026-06-24

The company's disclosed concentration profile is defined by two structural exposures that are closely interrelated: geographic concentration in California and Texas regulated utilities, and regulatory dependency on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The regulated utility operations in those two states are identified as the principal businesses, a high-share exposure that reflects the company's deliberate focus on large-scale regulated energy infrastructure in two of the most economically significant U.S. states. The California operations carry an additional layer of regulatory complexity: the CPUC conducts biennial administrative staff reviews, a medium-share structural exposure that governs recovery mechanisms, authorized returns, and cost disallowances. Because California utilities operate under a particularly active and at times contentious regulatory regime — especially with respect to wildfire liability, clean energy mandates, and rate cases — this regulatory dependency introduces a channel through which policy shifts can directly affect the economics of what is otherwise the company's largest geographic franchise. The Texas exposure provides some geographic diversification within the regulated utility segment, though its regulatory framework, operating characteristics, and risk profile differ materially from California. Neither exposure involves a named customer, supplier, or counterparty concentration. On balance, the disclosed profile is that of a large regulated utility holding company where performance is primarily shaped by two state regulatory environments — California being the more complex and influential of the two.

For the engine’s reasoning on SRE’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.

Industry peers · Utilities - Diversified

Peer concentration profile

SymbolNameHIGHMEDIUMLOWTotal
AESThe AES Corporation1113
AVAAvista Corporation1102
SREDBA Sempra1102

Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.

Concentration disclosures are extracted verbatim from SEC 10-K filings; the disclosed-size classification and the synthesis above are engine-derived. Size reflects how large each exposure is against fixed share thresholds (HIGH >50%, MEDIUM 25–50%, LOW <25% or an explicit diversification statement), not a judgment of how dangerous it is, and is not a buy/sell rating, a price target, or a view on the stock. Not a complete list of risk factors — see the full filing.

Home Stocks SRE Concentration risk
SRE concentration risks — customer, geographic & supplier exposure | TrendMatrix