Value
2.7/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 1.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| p ocf | 5.4 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸P/OCF: 20.7x (FFO proxy — REITs gated off P/E)
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Simon Property Group earns a quality score of 7.2 out of 10, driven by a return on equity of 114%, gross margins of approximately 71%, a Rule of 40 score of 57, and a wide economic moat rating, placing it in the top tier of quality among retail REITs relative to peers. Quality breakdown | Operating margins remain above 60% and return on equity stays above 80% over the next 4 reported quarters, confirming that the exceptional profitability is durable rather than a one-period effect. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh return on equity in a REIT is heavily influenced by debt levels rather than operational excellence; free cash flow is only 53% of net income (flagged as a quality warning), and the current ratio of 0.8 indicates short-term liquidity pressure. | ||
Simon Property Group has missed analyst earnings estimates in all 4 of the last reported quarters, with an average miss of -21.3%, including a -47% miss in February 2026 and a -18% miss in the most recent May 2026 quarter. Earnings | The company reverses this pattern and beats earnings estimates in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, with the average surprise rising above -5%, as property cash flow recovers and management resets guidance more conservatively. | →Stable |
| CounterFour consecutive misses averaging -21% is a severe signal of either structural deterioration or repeated management over-guidance; the price-to-operating-cash-flow of 19.8 times and the dividend yield flagged as potentially unsafe add additional concern. | ||
Despite poor earnings delivery, price momentum indicators are broadly positive: the moving average convergence-divergence is bullish, on-balance volume is rising, and the stock is trading above its 200-day moving average in a golden cross pattern with RSI at 67. Momentum breakdown | Rising on-balance volume persists for at least 6 more months with the stock holding above its 200-day moving average, suggesting institutional buyers are net purchasers even as headline earnings have disappointed. | →Stable |
| CounterRSI at 67 approaching overbought territory, combined with a stock near its 52-week high and only 0.2% upside to the technical take-profit target, suggests momentum may be close to exhaustion and the bull thesis may already be priced in. | ||
Essentially all of Simon's properties are in malls, Premium Outlets, and The Mills formats — a single property-type concentration flagged as a primary bear case concern — and the stock trades at a price-to-operating-cash-flow of 19.8 times, which the value model flags as expensive. Bear case | Funds from operations per share grows by at least 5% year-over-year over the next annual reporting period, justifying the premium valuation through occupancy and rent-per-square-foot improvements. | →Stable |
| CounterRetail real estate continues to face structural challenges from e-commerce; a single property-type REIT trading at a premium multiple with four consecutive earnings misses creates meaningful downside if occupancy or rental rates deteriorate. | ||
CounterHigh return on equity in a REIT is heavily influenced by debt levels rather than operational excellence; free cash flow is only 53% of net income (flagged as a quality warning), and the current ratio of 0.8 indicates short-term liquidity pressure.
CounterFour consecutive misses averaging -21% is a severe signal of either structural deterioration or repeated management over-guidance; the price-to-operating-cash-flow of 19.8 times and the dividend yield flagged as potentially unsafe add additional concern.
CounterRSI at 67 approaching overbought territory, combined with a stock near its 52-week high and only 0.2% upside to the technical take-profit target, suggests momentum may be close to exhaustion and the bull thesis may already be priced in.
CounterRetail real estate continues to face structural challenges from e-commerce; a single property-type REIT trading at a premium multiple with four consecutive earnings misses creates meaningful downside if occupancy or rental rates deteriorate.
Simon Property Group is a high-quality retail REIT with a return on equity of 114%, operating margins of 71%, and strong momentum with rising on-balance volume, but it has missed earnings estimates in all 4 of the last reported quarters by an average of 21% and now trades above its analyst consensus price target.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 1.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| p ocf | 5.4 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 3.7 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 0.8 |
| FCF quality | 4.2 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.1 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 7.3 |
| EPS growth | 5.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 2.5 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.8 |
| quality rank | 9.6 |
| growth rank | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.8 |
| support resistance | 1.0 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| volatility | 7.7 |
| put call | 7.8 |
| implied vol | 7.5 |
| beta | 5.7 |
| debt equity | 0.4 |
| news risk | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 64, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.33>1.3
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.21 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.2, Peer rank at 6.9, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.4; the weakest are Value at 2.7, Catalyst at 3.2, and Technical at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.21 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin falls below 55% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the margin structure is under meaningful pressure.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below -25% in any single quarter, or the miss streak extends to 6 consecutive quarters, confirming the guidance gap is widening.
Trip ifOn-balance volume declines below its 90-day moving average for more than 6 consecutive weeks, signaling institutional distribution has replaced accumulation.
Trip ifFunds from operations per share declines by more than 5% year-over-year in any reported period, indicating the premium valuation is no longer supported by cash generation growth.