Skip to main content
SNSharkNinja, Inc.Sell5.5·$148.60+1.90%
SN · Why this verdict

Why SharkNinja (SN) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

SharkNinja has delivered a perfect 4-for-4 earnings beat streak with an average surprise of 11.8%, backed by an excellent 29% return on equity and wide economic moat, but the stock trades above analyst consensus targets with negative asymmetry — making the quality case compelling while the current entry point is not.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

SharkNinja earns a 29% return on equity, carries wide economic moat designation, and achieves a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, reflecting a high-quality business with durable competitive advantages in consumer appliances.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity remains above 20% over the next 12 months, confirming the moat is generating sustained excess returns.

CounterFree cash flow conversion is only 31% of net income, which is a red flag suggesting reported earnings significantly overstate the actual cash being generated.

SharkNinja ranks best-in-class on margins and top-quartile on return on equity relative to peers in the furnishings and appliances sector, suggesting a structural competitive advantage rather than a cyclical profit surge.

Stable
Peer-rank breakdown
Expectation
The company maintains or improves its sector-leading margin position over the next 12 months, with operating margins staying above current peers.

CounterThe volume of goods sold is falling on a distribution basis (falling on-balance volume), which may foreshadow weakening sell-through as consumer spending normalizes.

SharkNinja has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 11.8% and a peak quarterly surprise of 21.9%, reflecting a consistent pattern of beating and raising expectations.

Improving
Earnings
Expectation
The company extends its beat streak through at least 2 more consecutive quarters, maintaining average surprises above 5%.

CounterA perfect beat streak can create an expectation trap where any inline result disappoints the market, and the stock already trades above its near-term resistance target of $136.71.

The stock trades above its analyst consensus target of $136.71 with negative 2.3% upside, meaning investors entering at current prices face a negative expected return relative to consensus fair value estimates.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Analyst targets are revised upward above $160 over the next 12 months, restoring a positive reward-to-risk profile of at least 1.5x.

CounterA cluster of 4 recent analyst upgrades in news activity suggests the analyst community may be in the process of revising estimates higher, which would quickly restore upside from current levels.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.4
P/S8.2
EV/EBITDA0.5
Fwd P/E6.3
PEG4.1
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 20.6x
  • PEG: 2.36

Quality

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE9.8
ROA8.6
Gross margin5.8
Op margin4.7
Net margin5.3
Current ratio8.1
FCF quality2.4
Moat7.5
Piotroski F8.9
  • Excellent ROE: 29%
  • Earnings quality RED FLAG: 31% FCF/NI
  • Wide economic moat
  • Compounder quality: strong returns + growth

Growth

4.5/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth6.4
EPS growth2.5

Momentum

2.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume1.7
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating8.4
Price target6.4
erm sentiment5.4

Insider

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality2.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change8.6
notable moves7.0
  • Heavy insider selling — $469,494,882 (2.275% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

6.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank1.3
quality rank8.8
growth rank8.5
  • Superior ROE vs peers
  • Best-in-class margins

Technical

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.0
support resistance5.2
52w position8.9

Risk (lower is worse)

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest2.8
days to cover5.3
volatility3.9
put call9.1
implied vol2.5
beta6.3
debt equity8.8
  • High IV: 65%
  • Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg8.4
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Earnings in 12 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (4)
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE
  • INSIDER:2.27%=EXTREME
Warning (1)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:12d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.66
Upside
-4.5%
Downside
6.9%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRange Bound RSI 49 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeCatalyst-Driven Earnings in 12d with 4/4 beat streak

SuitabilityModerate Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Catalyst at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE, INSIDER:2.27%=EXTREME) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.66 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 7.1, Sentiment at 6.9, and Quality at 6.8; the weakest are Momentum at 2.8, Growth at 4.5, and Value at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.66 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Perfect Four Quarter Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the established beat streak pattern.

  • P2Wide Moat High Return On Equity

    Trip ifReturn on equity drops below 20% in any reported fiscal year, indicating the economic moat is weakening.

  • P3Best In Class Peer Margins

    Trip ifOperating margin declines to below 10% for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling the competitive margin advantage is eroding.

  • P4Analyst Target Reached Negative Asymmetry

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $155, restoring at least 15% upside from the current price of $133.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks SN Why this verdict