Skip to main content
RRXRegal Rexnord CorporationHold5.6·$172.90
RRX · Why this verdict

Why Regal Rexnord (RRX) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Regal Rexnord has strong price momentum and exceptional free cash flow conversion well above reported earnings, but a perfect Piotroski score is undermined by weak profitability margins, below-average peer ranking, and zero remaining upside to the analyst consensus target.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The company beat earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, delivering small but consistent positive surprises averaging approximately 1.1%, reflecting disciplined cost management against consensus estimates.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, with EPS surprises averaging above 0% on a cumulative basis.

CounterThe average surprise of 1.1% is thin, the miss was on the negative side, and the supplier concentration risk from limited supplier dependence could drive unexpected cost inflation that disrupts the beat pattern.

Reliance on a single or limited number of suppliers is flagged as a high concentration risk, and operating and net margins are well below industry peers, limiting the business's ability to absorb supply chain disruptions.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Operating margin expands by at least 2 percentage points over the next 12 months as efficiency initiatives translate to earnings improvement.

CounterThe company has no identified competitive moat, which means it lacks pricing power to offset input cost increases, making supplier concentration a potentially severe risk during periods of supply chain stress.

Free cash flow conversion runs at 275% of net income, indicating the company generates significantly more cash than its reported earnings suggest, which provides financial flexibility for debt reduction or capital allocation.

Improving
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow as a percentage of net income remains above 150% over the next 12 months, sustaining the cash generation advantage over book earnings.

CounterDespite superior cash conversion, operating and net margins are thin, and return on equity of just above 1% suggests the business does not earn attractive returns on its capital base despite the cash flow profile.

The stock has formed a pattern consistent with a breakout, with a golden cross in moving averages, rising on-balance volume showing accumulation, and a momentum score of 7.7 indicating strong near-term price strength.

Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price momentum score remains above 6.0 and on-balance volume trend stays positive over the next 12 months.

CounterWith price already at the analyst target and zero upside remaining by that measure, further price appreciation would require analyst target increases, which may not materialize given weak operating margins.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E3.6
P/S9.0
EV/EBITDA4.3
Fwd P/E8.6
PEG4.8
Analyst target9.0
  • Forward P/E: 13.2x
  • PEG: 1.72

Quality

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE1.6
ROA2.3
Gross margin3.6
Op margin5.8
Net margin2.7
Current ratio7.8
FCF quality9.9
Moat5.2
Piotroski F10.0
  • Excellent cash conversion: 147% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

6.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.6
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

2.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
Volume3.7
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+5.3%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

7.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating8.2
Price target9.3
erm sentiment4.9
  • Light analyst coverage (10.0) — signal dampened
  • Analyst upside: 44%

Insider

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Modest insider selling — $3,263,531 (0.028% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

3.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.9
quality rank2.3
growth rank2.5

Technical

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.9
support resistance9.5
52w position4.0
gap4.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.6
days to cover8.3
volatility0.0
put call0.0
implied vol3.7
beta6.7
debt equity6.9
  • Elevated put/call: 2.71
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.8
dividend safety6.8
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (6)
  • ASYMMETRY:1.8>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:77d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.80
Upside
+25.3%
Downside
14.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate Balanced profile

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:1.8>=1.5. Top dim: Sentiment at 7.6; weakest: Momentum at 2.1. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.6, Growth at 6.8, and Value at 6.7; the weakest are Momentum at 2.1, Peer rank at 3.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.80 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Exceptional Free Cash Flow Conversion

    Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income falls below 100%, more than 175 percentage points below the current 275% level, indicating a structural deterioration in cash generation.

  • P2Strong Price Momentum Breakout

    Trip ifMomentum score drops below 5.0, indicating the breakout pattern has failed and selling pressure has returned.

  • P3Earnings Beat Streak Consistency

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the recent beat pattern.

  • P4Supplier Concentration And Low Margins

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 3%, more than 2 percentage points below its current level, indicating worsening cost pressure from supplier concentration.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks RRX Why this verdict