Value
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.0 |
| P/S | 9.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.8 |
| PEG | 4.6 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 18.9x
- ▸PEG: 1.88
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Two separate high-priority concentration risks exist simultaneously: key Consumer segment customers represent 65% of that segment's revenue, and sole-source suppliers create input cost and availability vulnerability — a paired risk that is uncommon even within specialty chemicals peers. Bear case | Both concentration metrics improve over 12 months as RPM adds new consumer retail distribution partnerships and qualifies alternative suppliers for its highest-risk inputs, reducing each below 55% and zero sole-source critical inputs respectively. | →Stable |
| CounterSpecialty coatings companies inherently serve concentrated retail distribution channels such as home improvement retailers; the customer concentration reflects industry structure rather than poor commercial strategy. | ||
Earnings results in the last four quarters were mixed — 2 beats, 1 miss, and 1 inline — with a notable 15% miss in January 2026 indicating that the business is more cyclically sensitive to input costs and volume than the steady revenue base implies. Earnings | EPS beats in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters as raw material costs normalize from elevated levels and the consumer-facing segment benefits from household formation and renovation spending recovery. | →Stable |
| CounterSpecialty chemicals companies inherently have quarterly earnings variability from raw material timing and seasonal construction patterns; the miss pattern may reflect quarterly noise rather than a structural margin problem. | ||
The current price of $108.85 is within 3% of the analyst consensus target of $112.11, leaving minimal near-term upside from current levels and placing new buyers in a situation where any execution setback or macro headwind could produce a drawdown larger than the remaining upside. Warnings | Analyst consensus price targets are revised upward to above $125 within 12 months following evidence that Construction Products Group margins are recovering and international operations are benefiting from currency normalization. | →Stable |
| CounterRPM's analyst coverage is high-quality and diverse; a near-target price often indicates the market has efficiently priced near-term expectations, and continued operational execution can generate additional earnings-driven target upgrades. | ||
Return on equity and return on assets rank in the top tier of the specialty chemicals peer group with a quality peer rank score of 7.8 out of 10, reflecting RPM's ability to generate above-average returns from its portfolio of branded coatings and sealants businesses. Peer-rank breakdown | Return on equity remains above 18% over the next four quarters as margin improvement initiatives and volume leverage continue to compound shareholder returns. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow conversion of only 57% of net income represents a meaningful quality concern, suggesting that RPM's reported earnings are less cash-generative than the headline return on equity implies. | ||
CounterSpecialty coatings companies inherently serve concentrated retail distribution channels such as home improvement retailers; the customer concentration reflects industry structure rather than poor commercial strategy.
CounterSpecialty chemicals companies inherently have quarterly earnings variability from raw material timing and seasonal construction patterns; the miss pattern may reflect quarterly noise rather than a structural margin problem.
CounterRPM's analyst coverage is high-quality and diverse; a near-target price often indicates the market has efficiently priced near-term expectations, and continued operational execution can generate additional earnings-driven target upgrades.
CounterFree cash flow conversion of only 57% of net income represents a meaningful quality concern, suggesting that RPM's reported earnings are less cash-generative than the headline return on equity implies.
RPM International is a specialty coatings and sealants company with superior return on equity relative to peers and strong analyst sentiment, but double concentration risks in both customer and supplier relationships, and the stock has essentially reached its analyst price target with minimal remaining upside at current levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.0 |
| P/S | 9.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.8 |
| PEG | 4.6 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.6 |
| ROA | 5.4 |
| Gross margin | 4.3 |
| Op margin | 2.6 |
| Net margin | 4.3 |
| Current ratio | 7.8 |
| FCF quality | 4.5 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.7 |
| EPS growth | 2.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 5.2 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 8.6 |
| Price target | 7.2 |
| erm sentiment | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 7.9 |
| growth rank | 6.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.8 |
| support resistance | 1.7 |
| 52w position | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.1 |
| days to cover | 6.1 |
| volatility | 6.2 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 4.9 |
| beta | 6.9 |
| debt equity | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.3 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupMomentum Cont — Trend continuation, RSI 61, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 7.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.1<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.06 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.3, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8, and Catalyst at 6.3; the weakest are Growth at 3.4, Technical at 3.7, and Peer rank at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.06 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue from any single customer channel grows to represent more than 40% of Consumer segment sales, increasing concentration beyond current levels.
Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 14% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the peer-leading capital efficiency advantage is eroding.
Trip ifPrice falls below $98, more than 10% below the current $108.85, while analyst targets remain above $105, indicating the market is applying a discount below even the more conservative analyst fair value estimates.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, confirming the mixed earnings execution is deteriorating into a sustained miss pattern.