Value
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.27
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Radiant Logistics is a cheap small-cap (forward P/E 16.0x, PEG 0.27) with a strong earnings-beat record, but thin margins, 57% FCF/net income, 4.1x D/E and a -15.2% revenue decline keep quality at 3.3/10.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality is weak at 3.3/10: only 57% of net income converts to free cash flow, margins are thin, and the company is flagged as below the quality floor of 4.0. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion improves toward 80% of net income and the quality score rises toward 4.0 over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 shows the financial trend is actually improving, so low quality may reflect low-margin freight brokerage economics rather than deterioration. | ||
Radiant has beaten EPS estimates in most recent quarters with no misses, averaging a 59% positive surprise over the last four reported quarters. Earnings | EPS keeps meeting or beating consensus through the next four quarters, including the report due 2026-11-09. | ↑Improving |
| CounterEPS estimates are tiny (about $0.08-$0.11), so large percentage surprises come from small absolute dollar beats and may not signal real earnings power. | ||
Two value-trap signals are flagged: revenue is declining 15.2% YoY and leverage is high at a debt-to-equity of 4.1. Bear case | Revenue growth returns to positive YoY and leverage stops rising over the next 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterRecent quarterly revenue of $261M is above the $221M of a year earlier, so the reported decline may be a trailing-period artifact rather than a current trend. | ||
The stock looks attractively valued with a forward P/E of 16.0x and a PEG of 0.27, implying the market under-prices expected earnings growth. Valuation breakdown | Earnings growth delivers on forecasts so the PEG stays below 1.0 as the share price rises. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA low PEG depends on forecast growth that may not materialize given falling trailing revenue and weak quality, making it a classic value-trap setup. | ||
The stock is oversold at an RSI of 25 while still above its 200-day average, with rising on-balance volume pointing to accumulation. Momentum breakdown | RSI recovers from oversold levels and the price holds above its 200-day average over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterWith reward-to-risk of only 1.3 at the current price and mixed technical signals, the oversold bounce may be limited and fail to hold. | ||
CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 shows the financial trend is actually improving, so low quality may reflect low-margin freight brokerage economics rather than deterioration.
CounterEPS estimates are tiny (about $0.08-$0.11), so large percentage surprises come from small absolute dollar beats and may not signal real earnings power.
CounterRecent quarterly revenue of $261M is above the $221M of a year earlier, so the reported decline may be a trailing-period artifact rather than a current trend.
CounterA low PEG depends on forecast growth that may not materialize given falling trailing revenue and weak quality, making it a classic value-trap setup.
CounterWith reward-to-risk of only 1.3 at the current price and mixed technical signals, the oversold bounce may be limited and fail to hold.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.7 |
| ROA | 1.8 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.9 |
| Net margin | 1.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.8 |
| FCF quality | 4.5 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 7.1 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.9 |
| MACD | 3.3 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 1.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.8 |
| Price target | 7.9 |
| erm sentiment | 6.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 6.1 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 2.8 |
| growth rank | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.2 |
| support resistance | 5.1 |
| 52w position | 7.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.1 |
| days to cover | 9.3 |
| volatility | 5.9 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.5 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 8.2 |
| debt equity | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.4B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 0.7<1.5@spot outcome against Growth at 8.6 and asymmetric R:R of 0.67.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.6, Catalyst at 7.9, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5; the weakest are Quality at 3.3, Peer rank at 5.3, and Momentum at 5.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.67 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow to net income falls below 40% from the current 57%.
Trip ifRevenue decline widens to more than 20% YoY from the current -15.2%.
Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 1.0 from the current 0.27.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 4.0 from the current 5.4.