Skip to main content
RLGTRadiant Logistics, Inc.Sell6.3·$9.00
RLGT · Why this verdict

Why Radiant Logistics (RLGT) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Radiant Logistics is a cheap small-cap (forward P/E 16.0x, PEG 0.27) with a strong earnings-beat record, but thin margins, 57% FCF/net income, 4.1x D/E and a -15.2% revenue decline keep quality at 3.3/10.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Business quality is weak at 3.3/10: only 57% of net income converts to free cash flow, margins are thin, and the company is flagged as below the quality floor of 4.0.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow conversion improves toward 80% of net income and the quality score rises toward 4.0 over 12 months.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 shows the financial trend is actually improving, so low quality may reflect low-margin freight brokerage economics rather than deterioration.

Radiant has beaten EPS estimates in most recent quarters with no misses, averaging a 59% positive surprise over the last four reported quarters.

↑Improving
Earnings
Expectation
EPS keeps meeting or beating consensus through the next four quarters, including the report due 2026-11-09.

CounterEPS estimates are tiny (about $0.08-$0.11), so large percentage surprises come from small absolute dollar beats and may not signal real earnings power.

Two value-trap signals are flagged: revenue is declining 15.2% YoY and leverage is high at a debt-to-equity of 4.1.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
Revenue growth returns to positive YoY and leverage stops rising over the next 12 months.

CounterRecent quarterly revenue of $261M is above the $221M of a year earlier, so the reported decline may be a trailing-period artifact rather than a current trend.

The stock looks attractively valued with a forward P/E of 16.0x and a PEG of 0.27, implying the market under-prices expected earnings growth.

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Earnings growth delivers on forecasts so the PEG stays below 1.0 as the share price rises.

CounterA low PEG depends on forecast growth that may not materialize given falling trailing revenue and weak quality, making it a classic value-trap setup.

The stock is oversold at an RSI of 25 while still above its 200-day average, with rising on-balance volume pointing to accumulation.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI recovers from oversold levels and the price holds above its 200-day average over the next 12 months.

CounterWith reward-to-risk of only 1.3 at the current price and mixed technical signals, the oversold bounce may be limited and fail to hold.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.7
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA3.3
Fwd P/E7.6
PEG10.0
Analyst target5.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 16.2x
  • ▸PEG: 0.27
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE2.7
ROA1.8
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.9
Net margin1.0
Current ratio5.8
FCF quality4.5
Moat5.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 57% FCF/NI
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

8.6/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.1
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI7.9
MACD3.3
OBV10.0
MA position6.0
Volume1.8
  • ▸Uptrend pullback (RSI 36) - buy opportunity
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating6.8
Price target7.9
erm sentiment6.1
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (3.0) — signal dampened
  • ▸Analyst upside: 22%

Insider

6.0/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.1
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.8
quality rank2.8
growth rank6.7

Technical

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger5.2
support resistance5.1
52w position7.6

Risk (lower is worse)

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.1
days to cover9.3
volatility5.9
put call10.0
implied vol5.5
max pain risk3.0
beta8.2
debt equity8.7
  • ▸Above max pain $2
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
  • ▸Earnings in 13 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (5)
  • MOMENTUM:5.8>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:0.7<1.5@spot
Warning (2)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:13d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
0.67
Upside
+3.9%
Downside
5.8%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.4B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 0.7<1.5@spot outcome against Growth at 8.6 and asymmetric R:R of 0.67.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.6, Catalyst at 7.9, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5; the weakest are Quality at 3.3, Peer rank at 5.3, and Momentum at 5.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.67 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Consistent Earnings Beats

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Thin Margin Weak Quality

    Trip ifFree cash flow to net income falls below 40% from the current 57%.

  • P3Revenue Decline Value Trap Risk

    Trip ifRevenue decline widens to more than 20% YoY from the current -15.2%.

  • P4Low Valuation Vs Growth

    Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 1.0 from the current 0.27.

  • P5Oversold In Uptrend

    Trip ifMomentum score falls below 4.0 from the current 5.4.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › RLGT › Why this verdict