Value
1.8/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock has already reached its V8 analyst target, implying -30.6% downside from current levels per the engine's valuation check. Bear case | The downside-to-target gap should narrow toward 0% or turn positive if the price corrects or analyst targets are raised. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst targets can lag fast-moving fundamentals, so the target-reached signal may understate genuine upside if the underlying business improves. | ||
Quality score of 2.0 sits below the engine's 4.0 floor, reflecting cash burn of -66% of revenue, no identified competitive moat, and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9. Quality breakdown | Quality score should rise above 4.0 over 12 months if FCF burn narrows and the Piotroski score improves. | →Stable |
| CounterHeavy cash burn and a weak Piotroski score are typical of early-stage diagnostics companies still scaling, and may not signal imminent distress. | ||
Revenue is declining 25% year-over-year, a headwind the engine's growth score directly captures. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should turn positive or the decline should narrow toward 0% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA 25% revenue decline could reflect a structural loss of a major customer or program rather than a cyclical dip, making a quick recovery unlikely. | ||
Momentum is overbought at RSI 83 while price sits above the 200-day moving average, suggesting the recent rally has run ahead of fundamentals. Momentum breakdown | RSI should cool toward the 50-70 range while price holds above the 200-day MA if the uptrend is genuine. | →Stable |
| CounterRSI above 80 often precedes a sharp pullback, especially when quality and growth metrics are this weak. | ||
Insider signal is BEARISH, with 330,050 net shares sold over the trailing 90 days across 6 sell transactions and zero buys. Insider | The insider signal should shift to NEUTRAL or BULLISH if insider buying emerges over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterRoutine diversification-driven insider sales can look bearish in aggregate without reflecting a negative view of the company. | ||
CounterAnalyst targets can lag fast-moving fundamentals, so the target-reached signal may understate genuine upside if the underlying business improves.
CounterHeavy cash burn and a weak Piotroski score are typical of early-stage diagnostics companies still scaling, and may not signal imminent distress.
CounterA 25% revenue decline could reflect a structural loss of a major customer or program rather than a cyclical dip, making a quick recovery unlikely.
CounterRSI above 80 often precedes a sharp pullback, especially when quality and growth metrics are this weak.
CounterRoutine diversification-driven insider sales can look bearish in aggregate without reflecting a negative view of the company.
Personalis has already reached its analyst target with implied downside, quality metrics sit well below the engine's floor amid cash burn and declining revenue, and insiders have been steady net sellers — a stack of bearish signals despite a short-term overbought bounce.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.4 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.8 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 1.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.0 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.7 |
| support resistance | 0.9 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.8 |
| days to cover | 7.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 2.5 |
| debt equity | 9.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 5.6 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.24>1.3, MCap $1.4B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 7.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-2.3=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.5, Catalyst at 6.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.2; the weakest are Peer rank at 0.0, Growth at 0.0, and Value at 1.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.28 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifStock price rises more than 15% while the analyst target stays flat, closing the downside-to-target gap to less than 5%.
Trip ifFCF burn narrows to above -30% of revenue or the Piotroski F-Score rises above 5 out of 9 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifRevenue decline exceeds 20% YoY for 2 more consecutive quarters without stabilizing.
Trip ifRSI falls below 40 or price closes below the 200-day moving average within 1 quarter.
Trip ifNet insider selling exceeds 1,000,000 shares in a rolling 90-day window, more than 3x the current pace.