Skip to main content
POOLPool CorporationSell5.3·$183.77+0.24%
POOL · Why this verdict

Why Pool (POOL) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Pool Corporation carries an excellent 34% return on equity and beats earnings in 3 of 4 quarters, but a death cross in place, a put-to-call ratio of 4.53, and heavy geographic concentration in four states combine with flat top-line growth to make this a hold-only situation with meaningful near-term downside risk.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Pool Corporation generates a 34% return on equity, which ranks it above peers, and has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, demonstrating that the distribution business model converts capital efficiently even during periods of weaker demand.

Improving
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity remains above 25% and the company beats consensus EPS in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters.

CounterReturn on equity can be inflated by leverage; Pool carries a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.4 and free cash flow represents only 55% of net income, raising questions about earnings quality.

A death cross is in effect with the 200-day moving average slope declining at negative 7.2% per 30 days and on-balance volume falling, confirming that selling pressure has outpaced buying interest over the near term.

Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The stock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for at least 30 consecutive calendar days within the next 6 months.

CounterRSI of 60 and an improving MACD suggest that momentum may be turning; the death cross is a lagging indicator and may not predict further downside from current levels.

53% of revenue is concentrated in four states — California, Florida, Texas, and Arizona — meaning regional weather anomalies, housing market downturns, or regulatory changes in those markets can disproportionately affect the business.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Top-four-state revenue concentration falls below 50% as management expands into new geographies over the next 12 months.

CounterThese four states represent the country's largest swimming pool markets by installed base, and concentration reflects rational market focus rather than a strategic failure.

The put-to-call ratio stands at 4.53 and implied volatility is elevated at 74%, indicating that options market participants have a strongly negative near-term view that adds meaningful overhang to any recovery rally.

Stable
Key risks
Expectation
The put-to-call ratio falls below 2.0 within the next 3 months, reflecting a reduction in bearish options positioning.

CounterA very high put-to-call ratio in a stock with strong long-term fundamentals can signal a contrarian buying opportunity, as maximum pessimism often precedes turning points.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.5
P/S9.5
EV/EBITDA4.1
Fwd P/E7.9
PEG1.1
Analyst target6.0
  • Forward P/E: 15.4x
  • PEG: 7.32

Quality

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA6.5
Gross margin1.9
Op margin5.9
Net margin3.7
Current ratio9.0
FCF quality3.9
Moat4.9
Piotroski F6.7
  • Excellent ROE: 31%
  • Earnings quality RED FLAG: 49% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat

Growth

3.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.0
EPS growth3.8

Momentum

2.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.0
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position1.0
Volume5.5
  • Capitulation risk (RSI 22, below 200MA)
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -6.7%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.4
Analyst rating7.0
Price target8.4
  • Analyst upside: 28%

Insider

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality6.5
insider conviction8.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Modest insider buying — $4,042,726 (0.060% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.6/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.0
quality rank8.1
growth rank2.2
  • Attractive P/E vs peers
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger10.0
support resistance8.8
52w position0.9

Risk (lower is worse)

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest4.3
days to cover7.7
volatility0.0
put call7.7
implied vol5.9
debt equity4.3
news risk6.0
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg1.7
dividend safety6.5
news activity8.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (4)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:88d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:1.1<1.5@spot
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.11
Upside
+11.1%
Downside
10.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupOversold Bounce Oversold RSI 22, near Bollinger lower, volume surge

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilitySpeculative Drawdown -46% (>40% off 52w high)

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 7.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5, ASYMMETRY:1.1<1.5@spot, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.11 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.9, Sentiment at 6.9, and Technical at 6.6; the weakest are Momentum at 2.1, Growth at 3.4, and Peer rank at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.11 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1High Roe Peer Quality

    Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 20% in any reported annual period over the next 12 months.

  • P2Death Cross And Weak Momentum

    Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope remains below negative 5% per 30 days for more than 5 consecutive months.

  • P3Geographic Concentration Risk

    Trip ifRevenue from the four concentrated states rises above 58% of total revenue in any reported period.

  • P4Extreme Bearish Options Positioning

    Trip ifThe put-to-call ratio rises above 6.0 at any point over the next 3 months.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks POOL Why this verdict