Value
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.7 |
| P/S | 8.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 7.5 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.92
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Planet Fitness ranks best-in-class among leisure peers with a quality score of 7.7/10, a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, operating margins of 18%, and ranks in the top decile for both quality and growth within its peer group, reflecting the durability of its low-cost fitness membership model. Quality breakdown | Operating margin remains above 15% and the Piotroski F-Score stays at 8 or above for the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh margins in the low-cost gym segment can be competed away quickly if rivals undercut Planet Fitness's $10/month price point, and franchise-model revenue recognition can mask underlying unit economics weakness. | ||
Planet Fitness has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 10.5%, with actual EPS ranging from $0.73 to $0.86, demonstrating consistent ability to manage costs and grow membership above analyst expectations. Earnings | The company beats earnings estimates in the next 2 consecutive quarterly reports due in approximately 50 days. | →Stable |
| CounterForward earnings estimates are trending down by 6.3% in the last 30 days, which is a leading indicator that analysts expect upcoming results to disappoint despite the historical beat streak. | ||
At a forward P/E of 13.9x and PEG of 0.86, Planet Fitness is attractively priced relative to earnings growth within the leisure sector, with a value score of 7.5/10 and analyst consensus pointing to 33% upside to a price target of approximately $60. Valuation breakdown | The stock reaches the analyst target range near $60 within 12 months as technical headwinds resolve and the growth rate is sustained. | →Stable |
| CounterA PEG of 0.86 is only attractive if the earnings growth rate holds — falling estimates of -6.3% over 30 days suggest the 'G' in the PEG denominator is about to shrink, making the current multiple less attractive than it appears. | ||
The stock is in a confirmed downtrend with the 200-day moving average declining at 8.8% per month — the steepest moving average slope decline across this analysis batch — and high short interest of 11% adds additional selling pressure that must be resolved before the fundamental case can be expressed. Warnings | The stock reclaims its 200-day moving average and holds above it for 20 consecutive trading days, confirming the downtrend has ended. | →Stable |
| CounterSteep 200-day moving average declines sometimes represent capitulation — the worst-case scenario for bearish price action — and high short interest can fuel sharp recovery moves when fundamentals surprise positively. | ||
CounterHigh margins in the low-cost gym segment can be competed away quickly if rivals undercut Planet Fitness's $10/month price point, and franchise-model revenue recognition can mask underlying unit economics weakness.
CounterForward earnings estimates are trending down by 6.3% in the last 30 days, which is a leading indicator that analysts expect upcoming results to disappoint despite the historical beat streak.
CounterA PEG of 0.86 is only attractive if the earnings growth rate holds — falling estimates of -6.3% over 30 days suggest the 'G' in the PEG denominator is about to shrink, making the current multiple less attractive than it appears.
CounterSteep 200-day moving average declines sometimes represent capitulation — the worst-case scenario for bearish price action — and high short interest can fuel sharp recovery moves when fundamentals surprise positively.
Planet Fitness is a high-quality fitness chain with a perfect 9-out-of-9 Piotroski F-Score and a perfect 4-for-4 earnings beat streak trading at a PEG of 0.86, but is currently in a confirmed technical downtrend with its 200-day moving average declining at 8.8% per month and falling analyst estimates.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.7 |
| P/S | 8.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 7.5 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 5.6 |
| Gross margin | 7.8 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 8.9 |
| Current ratio | 7.2 |
| FCF quality | 5.4 |
| Moat | 7.0 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 7.4 |
| EPS growth | 8.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 2.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.4 |
| Price target | 8.1 |
| erm sentiment | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.3 |
| quality rank | 9.2 |
| growth rank | 8.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.8 |
| support resistance | 2.0 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.0 |
| days to cover | 7.4 |
| volatility | 3.8 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 4.0 |
| beta | 6.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 1.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.4 |
News gate: 0 distinct critical events (0 MATERIAL_RISK articles).
L4:PATH_C2_GARP|NEWS_GATE:BLOCKEDnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 56
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -53% (>40% off 52w high)
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the HOLD_IF_HOLDING verdict: quality 7.7 and growth 7.7 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of 1.58 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.7, Growth at 7.7, and Value at 6.9; the weakest are Technical at 1.9, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.3, and Insider at 5.3. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.58 and an engine sizing output of HALF.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin falls below 12% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEarnings miss consensus estimates by more than 5% in 2 of the next 3 quarterly reports.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus earnings estimates decline by more than 15% from current levels over the next 6 months.
Trip ifStock price drops below $42, exceeding a 16% decline from current levels, confirming accelerating technical deterioration.