Value
4.7/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.6 |
| p ocf | 9.1 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸P/OCF: 7.5x (FFO proxy — REITs gated off P/E)
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Pebblebrook scores only 1.8 out of 10 on quality metrics — with near-zero operating margins, no competitive moat, and concerns around business quality — falling well below the 4.0 minimum required for a viable investment thesis. Quality breakdown | Quality score improves above 4.0 within 18 months as hotel occupancy and RevPAR trends improve and operating leverage kicks in. | →Stable |
| CounterHotel REITs are highly cyclical and capital-intensive; quality scores for this sector often look weak in relative terms but can improve rapidly in a travel-demand expansion phase. | ||
Short interest in Pebblebrook stands at 19% of float with the system flagging this as justified, indicating a significant proportion of market participants are positioned against the stock. Risk breakdown | Short interest declines below 10% within 12 months, signaling improved institutional confidence in the balance sheet and business fundamentals. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest can create a powerful squeeze dynamic if positive operational catalysts emerge; crowded short positions amplify upside moves on even modest good news. | ||
The dividend yield appears high but is flagged as unsafe, suggesting the payout may not be sustainable from free cash flow, creating a yield trap that could attract income investors before a cut is announced. Catalyst breakdown | The company maintains or grows the dividend without a cut over the next 4 quarters, proving the payout is supported by operating cash flows. | →Stable |
| CounterHotel REITs often have seasonally variable FFO, and a high yield in a recovery environment can reflect undervaluation rather than distress; dividends may be fully covered on an annualized basis. | ||
With price already trading above the analyst resistance target and upside of -23.6% to the analyst target, near-term price appreciation is exhausted and downside risk of up to 15% exists at current levels. Bear case | Analyst price targets are revised upward above $22 within 12 months, reopening the upside case as operational improvements are demonstrated. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst targets are lagging indicators and can be reset quickly; a positive inflection in hotel RevPAR data could prompt multiple target upgrades within a single quarter. | ||
CounterHotel REITs are highly cyclical and capital-intensive; quality scores for this sector often look weak in relative terms but can improve rapidly in a travel-demand expansion phase.
CounterHigh short interest can create a powerful squeeze dynamic if positive operational catalysts emerge; crowded short positions amplify upside moves on even modest good news.
CounterHotel REITs often have seasonally variable FFO, and a high yield in a recovery environment can reflect undervaluation rather than distress; dividends may be fully covered on an annualized basis.
CounterAnalyst targets are lagging indicators and can be reset quickly; a positive inflection in hotel RevPAR data could prompt multiple target upgrades within a single quarter.
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust trades above analyst resistance targets with a quality score of 1.8 and short interest of 19%, while an exceptionally high dividend yield is flagged as unsustainable, making the risk/reward unattractive despite strong recent price momentum.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.6 |
| p ocf | 9.1 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.8 |
| Gross margin | 1.0 |
| Op margin | 1.8 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.4 |
| Moat | 3.6 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 1.5 |
| OBV | 9.7 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 3.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| insider conviction | 8.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 1.7 |
| growth rank | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.2 |
| support resistance | 3.6 |
| 52w position | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.6 |
| days to cover | 3.6 |
| volatility | 4.1 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.7 |
| beta | 5.4 |
| debt equity | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRange Bound — RSI 54 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.40>1.3, MCap $2.1B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Insider at 6.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.9=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 6.5, Technical at 5.6, and Momentum at 5.2; the weakest are Quality at 1.8, Risk (lower is worse) at 2.9, and Catalyst at 3.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.89 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score remains below 3.0 for 2 consecutive evaluation periods, indicating no improvement in operating margins.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 25%, indicating further deterioration in institutional sentiment beyond current 19% level.
Trip ifDividend is cut by more than 30% within the next 2 quarterly distributions, confirming the yield trap thesis.
Trip ifStock price falls below $15, declining more than 18% below current levels toward prior support zones.