Value
8.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.1 |
| P/S | 7.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 9.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.07
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A PEG ratio of 0.08 and forward price-to-earnings of 10.0x indicate the stock trades at a substantial discount to its growth rate, with analyst upside of 39% to the consensus price target of $61.55. Valuation breakdown | The stock price rises above $58 within 12 months as the valuation gap to growth closes. | →Stable |
| CounterPEG ratios below 0.1 in commodities companies frequently reflect cyclical peak earnings rather than durable undervaluation; if commodity prices normalize, the denominator shrinks and the PEG expands rapidly. | ||
A recent 7.4% gap up leaves an unfilled gap below the current price at approximately $47.50, creating a technical risk that the stock pulls back to fill the gap before resuming any uptrend. Technical breakdown | Price holds above $47.00 (the gap level) over the next 3 months without a full retracement to pre-gap levels. | →Stable |
| CounterNot all gap-ups fill; in strongly trending stocks with improving fundamentals, gaps can act as support levels and the pullback risk may be overstated relative to the upside momentum. | ||
Pan American Silver carries a wide economic moat score of 9.0 out of 10, a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, and compounder-quality characteristics combining strong returns with strong growth, placing it in the top tier of the universe on business quality. Quality breakdown | The quality score remains above 7.5 and the moat score holds at 8.0 or higher over the next 4 reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterMoat designations for precious metals miners are highly contested; silver prices are the primary driver of returns, and cost advantages can erode quickly if mine grades decline or input costs rise. | ||
Revenue grew 49% year-over-year, placing Pan American Silver as an industry growth leader, supported by earnings growth components also at the maximum score of 10.0 out of 10. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 20% year-over-year for at least 2 of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong revenue growth in a precious metals miner is largely a function of silver and gold price movements rather than volume expansion; a commodity price reversal could cut revenue growth sharply with no operational offset. | ||
CounterPEG ratios below 0.1 in commodities companies frequently reflect cyclical peak earnings rather than durable undervaluation; if commodity prices normalize, the denominator shrinks and the PEG expands rapidly.
CounterNot all gap-ups fill; in strongly trending stocks with improving fundamentals, gaps can act as support levels and the pullback risk may be overstated relative to the upside momentum.
CounterMoat designations for precious metals miners are highly contested; silver prices are the primary driver of returns, and cost advantages can erode quickly if mine grades decline or input costs rise.
CounterStrong revenue growth in a precious metals miner is largely a function of silver and gold price movements rather than volume expansion; a commodity price reversal could cut revenue growth sharply with no operational offset.
Pan American Silver combines a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, a wide economic moat, 49% year-over-year revenue growth, and a PEG ratio of 0.08, making it one of the strongest fundamental profiles in the dataset, though sector concentration caps and a recent 7.4% gap-up create near-term entry timing risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.1 |
| P/S | 7.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 6.9 |
| ROA | 7.1 |
| Gross margin | 7.1 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.5 |
| FCF quality | 7.1 |
| Moat | 9.0 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.3 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 3.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.5 |
| Analyst rating | 6.8 |
| Price target | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.3 |
| quality rank | 5.3 |
| growth rank | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.0 |
| support resistance | 8.7 |
| 52w position | 2.9 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.5 |
| implied vol | 3.1 |
| beta | 4.9 |
| debt equity | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.5 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 7.0 |
Quality-value play. Wait for momentum improvement.
L4:PATH_C_QUALITY_VALUE_WAIT|ENTRY_STICKY:PRIOR_STILL_VIABLEnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 41 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.54>1.3
The C-path quality+value combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 8.5 and value 8.5 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of 3.50 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 8.5, and Quality at 8.5; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.5, Insider at 5.0, and Momentum at 5.2. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.50 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score drops below 7 in any single reporting period.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifThe analyst consensus price target falls below $50, a decline of more than 18% from the current target of $61.55.
Trip ifPrice drops below $44 (the gap fill level) and closes below that level for 3 or more consecutive days.