Value
2.4/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Ouster achieved 49% year-over-year revenue growth, placing it at the top of its industry peer group for growth, though the business has not yet converted this growth into profitability. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 30% year-over-year for at least 2 of the next 4 quarters as new lidar applications expand the addressable market. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh-growth hardware companies face rapid commoditization; a competitor with lower-cost production could erode Ouster's growth trajectory within 12 to 18 months. | ||
Free cash flow is negative 25% of revenue, and the business posted operating and net margin scores of zero out of ten, meaning the company is consuming cash at a material rate relative to its top line. Quality breakdown | Cash burn as a percentage of revenue improves to below 15% within 4 reporting periods as scale benefits begin to reduce operating losses. | →Stable |
| CounterThe current ratio of 9.9 suggests ample near-term liquidity, and cash-burning growth companies in hardware have historically accessed capital markets while their unit economics improved. | ||
Ouster's last 4 quarters showed 2 beats and 2 misses, with the most recent miss coming in 115.6% below estimates, indicating highly unpredictable near-term earnings outcomes. Earnings | Earnings surprise magnitude narrows to within 30% of estimates for 3 of the next 4 reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one quarter that beat expectations came in 149% above estimates, suggesting the business can occasionally generate outsized positive surprises that more than offset the misses. | ||
Implied volatility of 143% is the highest in the dataset, reflecting extreme uncertainty about near-term price direction and pricing in a wide range of outcomes around the current stock price of $45.18. Options | Implied volatility falls below 80% within 6 months as the business reports more predictable quarterly results. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh implied volatility can also represent opportunity for income-generating strategies and may compress rapidly if the company delivers 2 consecutive in-line or better quarters. | ||
CounterHigh-growth hardware companies face rapid commoditization; a competitor with lower-cost production could erode Ouster's growth trajectory within 12 to 18 months.
CounterThe current ratio of 9.9 suggests ample near-term liquidity, and cash-burning growth companies in hardware have historically accessed capital markets while their unit economics improved.
CounterThe one quarter that beat expectations came in 149% above estimates, suggesting the business can occasionally generate outsized positive surprises that more than offset the misses.
CounterHigh implied volatility can also represent opportunity for income-generating strategies and may compress rapidly if the company delivers 2 consecutive in-line or better quarters.
Ouster posted 49% year-over-year revenue growth and leads its industry peer group on that dimension, but the business burns cash at 25% of revenue, carries a rich valuation, and delivers inconsistent earnings — creating a high-risk profile where the growth story must continue to accelerate to justify the current price.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 5.5 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.9 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 6.5 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.3 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.3 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.3 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.7 |
| quality rank | 0.9 |
| growth rank | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.5 |
| support resistance | 6.9 |
| 52w position | 3.8 |
| gap | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.8 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 9.7 |
| news risk | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 49 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 3.17>1.3, MCap $3.3B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Technical at 5.9, and Catalyst at 5.2; the weakest are Value at 2.4, Quality at 3.2, and Momentum at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.50 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifCash burn exceeds 35% of revenue in any single quarter.
Trip ifEarnings per share misses consensus by more than 50% in 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifImplied volatility rises above 180% and price drops below $35.