Benchmark Electronics and Fabrinet
“10-K Item 1: 'Benchmark and Fabrinet manufacture the majority of our products, which we expect will reduce our product costs'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Ouster discloses is Benchmark Electronics and Fabrinet, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Ouster’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Benchmark and Fabrinet manufacture the majority of our products, which we expect will reduce our product costs'”
“10-K Item 1: 'For the year ended December 31, 2025, two customers accounted for more than 10% of our revenue.'”
Ouster's concentration exposures sit on both the supply and customer sides, at different magnitudes. On the supply chain, Benchmark Electronics and Fabrinet manufacture the majority of its products, a medium-share dependency the company frames as expected to reduce product costs — a deliberate manufacturing-partner concentration rather than an unplanned vulnerability. On the customer side, two customers each accounted for more than 10% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025, a low-share dependency exposure. The supplier concentration is the more structurally significant of the two: relying on a small number of contract manufacturers for the majority of production means any disruption at either partner could affect output more broadly than the customer concentration would affect revenue, given that exposure is disclosed at a low share. Because both are dependency-type exposures rather than structural features of the business model, they are tied to the specific fortunes and reliability of named counterparties rather than the broader market. Overall, the supply-side relationship appears to be the more consequential of the two disclosed concentrations.
For the engine’s reasoning on OUST’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APH | Amphenol Corporation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| BELFB | Bel Fuse Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| BHE | Benchmark Electronics, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| ALNT | Allient Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| BELFA | Bel Fuse Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| OUST● | Ouster, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.