single vendor
“10-K Item 1A: 'there are some technologies and components that can only be purchased from a single vendor due to price, quality, technology, availability or other business constraints'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Oracle discloses is single vendor, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Oracle’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'there are some technologies and components that can only be purchased from a single vendor due to price, quality, technology, availability or other business constraints'”
“10-K Item 1: 'our cloud services revenues represented 43%, 37% and 32% of our total revenues during fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively'”
Oracle's disclosed concentration exposures are few in number but differ sharply in character. On the supply side, the company notes that some technologies and components can only be purchased from a single vendor due to price, quality, technology, availability, or other business constraints — a high-share dependency exposure, though no percentage is quantified, tied to specific inputs rather than the business as a whole. On the revenue side, cloud services now represent 43% of total revenues, up from 37% in the prior year and 32% the year before — a medium-share, structural exposure reflecting Oracle's strategic shift toward cloud rather than reliance on any one customer or geography. These two exposures net out differently: the single-vendor dependency is the more idiosyncratic risk, since a disruption at one supplier could directly constrain specific components, while the growing cloud revenue share is a deliberate business-model transition and a sign of diversification away from legacy license revenue rather than a warning sign. On balance, the vendor dependency is the exposure most worth watching, given its high-share, single-counterparty nature, while the cloud revenue mix is better read as a structural business shift than as a risk concentration.
For the engine’s reasoning on ORCL’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI | C3.ai, Inc. | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| ORCL● | Oracle Corporation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| AEVA | Aeva Technologies, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| AIOT | PowerFleet, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ACIW | ACI Worldwide, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AKAM | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.