Value
6.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.0 |
| P/S | 5.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 19.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.22
OLED · Why this verdict
Why Universal Display (OLED) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Universal Display Corporation generates strong margins of 34% and ranks best-in-class among peers, with analysts projecting 38% upside from current levels, but revenue is declining 14% year-over-year and the company faces high concentration among three customers — BOE, LG Display, and SDC — limiting pricing power.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Three customers — BOE, LG Display, and Samsung Display (SDC) — together account for the majority of Universal Display's revenue, and the single supplier concentration with PPG creates a dual-sided supply chain fragility that leaves revenue and material costs exposed to bilateral negotiation leverage. Bear case | Revenue from the top 3 customers decreases to represent less than 70% of total sales within 12 months as additional panel manufacturers adopt OLED technology. | ↑Improving |
| CounterLarge panel manufacturers adopting OLED technology tend to be sticky customers given the process integration required, and having the leading global manufacturers as customers validates the technology's competitive position. | ||
Revenue has declined 14% year-over-year, and earnings beat count is split 2 beats and 2 misses over the last 4 quarters, indicating that the top-line pressure from slower OLED panel demand is creating real execution uncertainty for the company. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth returns to positive territory (above 0% year-over-year) within 2 reported quarters as OLED display adoption expands into IT and automotive applications. | ↑Improving |
| CounterA temporary pause in panel manufacturer capex spending can create a demand trough that reverses sharply, and the earnings quality warning (61% FCF to net income) may partly reflect conservative accounting rather than a structural problem. | ||
Universal Display achieves net margins of 34% and ranks highest among electronic component peers on both margins and quality scores, reflecting the value of its phosphorescent OLED materials and technology licensing business where intellectual property commands premium pricing. Quality breakdown | Net margin stays above 28% over the next 4 reported quarters, confirming the durable nature of the licensing-driven margin structure. | ↑Improving |
| CounterA Rule of 40 score of only 6 and declining revenue of 14% indicate that margin strength is not being accompanied by growth, and if panel makers reduce OLED display production, material volumes will fall and margins could compress quickly. | ||
Analysts project 38% upside with a target of approximately $111, and the technical setup shows recovering MACD and rising on-balance volume even though the stock is below its 200-day moving average, suggesting a potential recovery setup if demand from panel makers rebounds. Sentiment breakdown | Stock price rises above $100 within 12 months as analyst targets are progressively achieved through a panel demand recovery cycle. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe 52-week position score near the low end of the range and a death cross pattern currently in place suggest that the price has been declining for an extended period, and analyst targets may be lagging reality rather than leading it. | ||
Three customers — BOE, LG Display, and Samsung Display (SDC) — together account for the majority of Universal Display's revenue, and the single supplier concentration with PPG creates a dual-sided supply chain fragility that leaves revenue and material costs exposed to bilateral negotiation leverage.
↑ImprovingBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue from the top 3 customers decreases to represent less than 70% of total sales within 12 months as additional panel manufacturers adopt OLED technology.
CounterLarge panel manufacturers adopting OLED technology tend to be sticky customers given the process integration required, and having the leading global manufacturers as customers validates the technology's competitive position.
Revenue has declined 14% year-over-year, and earnings beat count is split 2 beats and 2 misses over the last 4 quarters, indicating that the top-line pressure from slower OLED panel demand is creating real execution uncertainty for the company.
↑ImprovingGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth returns to positive territory (above 0% year-over-year) within 2 reported quarters as OLED display adoption expands into IT and automotive applications.
CounterA temporary pause in panel manufacturer capex spending can create a demand trough that reverses sharply, and the earnings quality warning (61% FCF to net income) may partly reflect conservative accounting rather than a structural problem.
Universal Display achieves net margins of 34% and ranks highest among electronic component peers on both margins and quality scores, reflecting the value of its phosphorescent OLED materials and technology licensing business where intellectual property commands premium pricing.
↑ImprovingQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Net margin stays above 28% over the next 4 reported quarters, confirming the durable nature of the licensing-driven margin structure.
CounterA Rule of 40 score of only 6 and declining revenue of 14% indicate that margin strength is not being accompanied by growth, and if panel makers reduce OLED display production, material volumes will fall and margins could compress quickly.
Analysts project 38% upside with a target of approximately $111, and the technical setup shows recovering MACD and rising on-balance volume even though the stock is below its 200-day moving average, suggesting a potential recovery setup if demand from panel makers rebounds.
↑ImprovingSentiment breakdown
- Expectation
- Stock price rises above $100 within 12 months as analyst targets are progressively achieved through a panel demand recovery cycle.
CounterThe 52-week position score near the low end of the range and a death cross pattern currently in place suggest that the price has been declining for an extended period, and analyst targets may be lagging reality rather than leading it.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.5 |
| ROA | 4.7 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.4 |
| FCF quality | 3.6 |
| Moat | 8.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 5.5 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong margins: 37%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 45% FCF/NI
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
Growth
8.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.2 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.7 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 2.6 |
- ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 74)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -5.9%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 6.9 |
| Price target | 8.5 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (9.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 29%
Insider
4.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 4.6 |
| notable moves | 5.0 |
- ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $422,092 (0.010% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
6.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 7.6 |
| growth rank | 3.0 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
2.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.0 |
| support resistance | 2.6 |
| 52w position | 1.9 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.0 |
| days to cover | 4.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 3.3 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.1 |
| debt equity | 9.9 |
- ▸High IV: 60%
- ▸Above max pain $40
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.2 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:107d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:4.5<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:0.8<1.5@spot
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
0.79
Upside
+11.8%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 74
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -40% (>40% off 52w high)
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Growth at 8.1; weakest: Technical at 2.9. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.1, Quality at 7.2, and Sentiment at 6.8; the weakest are Technical at 2.9, Momentum at 4.5, and Insider at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.79 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Best In Class Margins
Trip ifNet margin falls below 20% for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling the high-margin licensing model is under structural pressure.
- P2Customer Concentration Risk
Trip ifAny single customer represents more than 50% of revenue in a disclosed period, indicating concentration risk has intensified rather than diversified.
- P3Revenue Decline Headwind
Trip ifRevenue declines more than 20% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the demand trough is deeper than a cyclical correction.
- P4Analyst Upside Recovery Thesis
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $85, reducing projected upside to less than 10% from current levels.