Value
9.7/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 4.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Northern Oil and Gas trades at a forward P/E of 4.8x with a PEG ratio of 0.03, making it among the most cheaply valued companies in the oil and gas exploration and production sector relative to its near-term earnings expectations. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E expands above 7x within 12 months as investors re-rate the stock toward fair value given the earnings delivery track record. | →Stable |
| CounterExtremely low P/E ratios in oil and gas companies typically reflect cyclical earnings near peak estimates that the market does not believe are sustainable, rather than persistent undervaluation. | ||
Northern Oil has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with the most recent 4 quarters averaging nearly 20% positive surprise, including a very large beat of 43.6% in the August 2025 quarter. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with positive surprises above 5%. | →Stable |
| CounterOil and gas earnings beats often reflect temporary commodity price moves rather than operational improvements, and estimate revisions downward by 5.8% over the past 30 days suggest deteriorating near-term expectations. | ||
A quality score of 2.8 below the 4.0 floor reflects that free cash flow is barely positive at negative 1% of revenue, the Rule of 40 fails at negative 8, and there is no competitive moat, indicating the company's fundamental business health is weak relative to its size. Quality breakdown | Quality score rises above 4.0 within 12 months through free cash flow improvement and operational efficiency gains. | →Stable |
| CounterNon-operator oil and gas companies like Northern Oil structurally generate lumpy free cash flow tied to partner drilling decisions, so free cash flow metrics are less meaningful than for operator peers. | ||
Short interest at 20% of the float combined with a volume surge of 2.1 times average on recent selloff days indicates that professional investors are actively betting against Northern Oil, and recent selling has been accompanied by above-average trading activity. Momentum breakdown | Short interest falls below 12% within 9 months as earnings delivery and commodity price stability reduce bearish conviction. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest in oil and gas exploration companies is common and can represent hedging by energy companies rather than pure directional bearish bets from investors. | ||
CounterExtremely low P/E ratios in oil and gas companies typically reflect cyclical earnings near peak estimates that the market does not believe are sustainable, rather than persistent undervaluation.
CounterOil and gas earnings beats often reflect temporary commodity price moves rather than operational improvements, and estimate revisions downward by 5.8% over the past 30 days suggest deteriorating near-term expectations.
CounterNon-operator oil and gas companies like Northern Oil structurally generate lumpy free cash flow tied to partner drilling decisions, so free cash flow metrics are less meaningful than for operator peers.
CounterHigh short interest in oil and gas exploration companies is common and can represent hedging by energy companies rather than pure directional bearish bets from investors.
Northern Oil and Gas offers an exceptional valuation at a forward P/E of 4.8x and PEG of 0.03, with four consecutive earnings beats, but its quality score of 2.8 falls well below the minimum threshold, revenue is declining 7%, and 20% short interest reflects high professional skepticism.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 2.9 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.7 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 3.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.9 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| erm sentiment | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.9 |
| quality rank | 0.7 |
| growth rank | 1.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.2 |
| support resistance | 9.5 |
| 52w position | 1.6 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.6 |
| days to cover | 4.4 |
| volatility | 1.6 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 1.5 |
| beta | 8.7 |
| debt equity | 4.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 2.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupFalling Knife — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 23, MACD bearish
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($2.0B) below institutional reach
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -42% (>40% off 52w high)
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.7<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.7, Sentiment at 6.8, and Technical at 6.6; the weakest are Momentum at 2.7, Quality at 2.8, and Peer rank at 2.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 7.42 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E falls below 3x within 12 months due to downward earnings revisions exceeding 30%.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below negative 10% of revenue for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 25% of the float within 6 months.