four footwear contract manufacturers
“10-K Item 1: 'four footwear contract manufacturers each accounted for greater than 10% of footwear production and in the aggregate accounted for approximately 60% of NIKE Brand footwear production'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Nike discloses is four footwear contract manufacturers at 60%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Nike’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'four footwear contract manufacturers each accounted for greater than 10% of footwear production and in the aggregate accounted for approximately 60% of NIKE Brand footwear production'”
“10-K Item 1: 'factories in Vietnam, Indonesia and China manufactured approximately 52%, 27% and 16% of total NIKE Brand footwear'”
“10-K Item 1: 'NIKE Brand and Converse sales in the United States accounted for approximately 44% of total revenues'”
Nike's concentration is concentrated in manufacturing rather than customers. Four footwear contract manufacturers each accounted for greater than 10% of footwear production and in the aggregate approximately 60% of NIKE Brand footwear production, a high-share dependency. Geography compounds it: factories in Vietnam, Indonesia and China manufactured approximately 52%, 27% and 16% of total NIKE Brand footwear, so Vietnam alone is a high-share exposure. The supplier and country exposures overlap, since the same contract manufacturers operate those factories, meaning a disruption in one country would reach several of the key suppliers at once. On the demand side, NIKE Brand and Converse sales in the United States accounted for approximately 44% of total revenues, a medium-share structural exposure that reflects the home market rather than a counterparty. Netting these out, the demand mix is a structural feature, while the footwear sourcing concentration in a few manufacturers and in Vietnam is the idiosyncratic item most likely to move the verdict, through trade policy, regional disruption or supplier-specific problems.
For the engine’s reasoning on NKE’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NKE● | Nike, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| SHOO | Steven Madden, Ltd. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DECK | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| FOSL | Fossil Group, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| CROX | Crocs, Inc. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| WEYS | Weyco Group, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.