Skip to main content
MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions HoldHold5.9·$269.39-4.75%
MTSI · Why this verdict

Why MACOM Technology Solutions Hold (MTSI) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

MACOM Technology Solutions combines 22% revenue growth and a near-perfect Piotroski score with a wide economic moat in semiconductors, but its current price has already reached the analyst target, leaving negative asymmetry and limiting the risk-reward for new positions.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

MACOM posted 22% year-over-year revenue growth and holds a wide economic moat with a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, indicating durable competitive advantages alongside strong fundamental momentum.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth remains above 15% YoY and the Piotroski score stays at 8 or above over the next 12 months.

CounterRich valuation at a forward P/E of 56.2x means any growth deceleration could trigger a sharp multiple contraction well before fundamentals deteriorate.

Top-10 customers represent 56.7% of revenue and international customers account for 56.3%, meaning a single large customer loss or geopolitical disruption could materially impair revenue.

Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
Customer and geographic concentration ratios remain flat or decline below 50% over the next year.

CounterHigh customer concentration often reflects sticky long-term design-win relationships in semiconductor supply chains, making sudden customer departures unlikely in practice.

With an asymmetry ratio of -0.74 and the stock trading 9.9% above the price target, the current setup offers more downside than upside, making new entry unattractive on a risk-adjusted basis.

TrippedStable
V9
Expectation
The reward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5 as the price pulls back to or below the entry zone over the next 12 months.

CounterStrong momentum (above 200-day moving average with rising on-balance volume) can sustain overvalued prices for extended periods in high-growth semiconductor names.

MACOM has beaten consensus earnings estimates in 2 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 1.36%, and has not missed once, reflecting disciplined execution and conservative guidance.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
MACOM beats or meets earnings estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with no misses.

CounterAverage surprise of only 1.36% suggests guidance is set close to actual results, leaving little room for an upward revision cycle that could re-rate the stock.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

3.9/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E0.0
P/S0.0
Fwd P/E2.8
PEG7.6
Analyst target9.0
  • Forward P/E: 38.5x
  • PEG: 0.90

Quality

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.5
ROA3.6
Gross margin7.1
Op margin7.0
Net margin8.2
Current ratio5.5
FCF quality3.7
Moat8.4
Piotroski F10.0
  • Strong margins: 16%
  • Earnings quality RED FLAG: 46% FCF/NI
  • Wide economic moat
  • Compounder quality: strong returns + growth

Growth

9.1/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth8.1
EPS growth10.0
  • Strong growth: 22% YoY

Momentum

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI8.2
MACD0.0
OBV10.0
MA position4.0
Volume0.8
  • Oversold in uptrend (RSI 27)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

7.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.2
Price target9.5
erm sentiment5.0
  • Analyst upside: 50%

Insider

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality3.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Notable insider selling — $27,755,221 (0.136% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.4
quality rank6.2
growth rank4.7

Technical

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.0
support resistance9.1
52w position2.7
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.5
days to cover9.9
volatility0.0
put call0.0
implied vol0.0
beta4.5
debt equity8.8
  • Elevated put/call: 2.00
  • High IV: 98%
  • Concentration risks: 3 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.2
  • Earnings in 12 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:4.6>=4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:2.3>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)

none

Warning (2)
  • MOMENTUM:4.6<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:12d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
2.27
Upside
+30.6%
Downside
13.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive Beta 1.66>1.3

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:4.6>=4.5. Top dim: Growth at 9.1; weakest: Value at 3.9. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.1, Sentiment at 7.3, and Technical at 6.5; the weakest are Value at 3.9, Peer rank at 4.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.5. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.27 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Exceptional Growth And Moat

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Customer Geographic Concentration Risk

    Trip ifRevenue from top-10 customers rises above 65% of total revenue.

  • P3Negative Price AsymmetryTripped

    Trip ifStock price drops below $340 (more than 11% below current $384.77).

  • P4Earnings Consistency Catalyst

    Trip ifEarnings miss consensus by more than 5% in any single quarter.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks MTSI Why this verdict