Value
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 4.5 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.1x
- ▸PEG: 2.02
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow is running at approximately -644% relative to reported net income — a severe red flag indicating the business is consuming capital at a rate far exceeding its earnings, and that reported profits are not converting into distributable cash. Quality breakdown | The FCF-to-net-income ratio improves above -100% over the next 12 months as a baseline prerequisite for reconsidering the investment. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme negative FCF in a resource-extraction business can reflect lumpy capital expenditure cycles; if investment spending normalizes in future periods, cash generation may improve without any fundamental deterioration. | ||
Reading the most recent quarter first: the company missed estimates by 77% in the latest print, missed by 51% the prior quarter, then posted a 9% beat, then missed again — 3 of the last 4 quarters were misses, with an average negative surprise of -37%, making forward earnings guidance unreliable. Earnings | EPS surprise turns positive and exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling the company has regained forecasting credibility. | →Stable |
| CounterThe single beat (9.4% positive surprise in the third-most-recent quarter) shows the company can post upside prints when conditions align, though an isolated beat amid a miss-heavy streak is insufficient to call a trend reversal. | ||
The company faces dual geographic concentration: 64% of customers are based outside the United States and phosphate mining operations are concentrated in Florida — an exposure that amplifies weather, regulatory, and currency risks simultaneously. Bear case | International customer concentration falls below 55% of total revenue within 2 years, indicating meaningful diversification of the demand base. | →Stable |
| CounterGeographic specialization in Florida phosphate may reflect genuine operational advantages in proximity to reserves; concentration in a region where the company holds scale advantages is not straightforwardly negative. | ||
The stock is in a confirmed downtrend — the 200-day moving average is declining at -5.7% per month, a death cross is in place, and multiple technical gates have failed simultaneously — conditions that collectively indicate the market is pricing in continued deterioration. Engine gate (failed) | The stock crosses back above its 200-day moving average and holds there for at least 10 consecutive trading days before the technical setup is reconsidered. | →Stable |
| CounterDeep technical weakness in a commodity producer can sometimes coincide with a cyclical trough that precedes a sharp price recovery if the underlying commodity price rebounds; the current setup may reflect sentiment at an extreme rather than a structural decline. | ||
The dividend payout is running at approximately 391% of net income — meaning the company is distributing nearly four times its current earnings as dividends, a level that cannot be sustained without either an earnings recovery or a dividend reduction. Catalyst breakdown | The payout ratio falls below 100% within 2 fiscal years as earnings recover or the dividend is restructured. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh payout ratios in commodity companies can be temporarily supported by accumulated cash reserves or asset realizations; management may view the elevated payout as a bridge to a recovery rather than a permanent structural mismatch. | ||
CounterExtreme negative FCF in a resource-extraction business can reflect lumpy capital expenditure cycles; if investment spending normalizes in future periods, cash generation may improve without any fundamental deterioration.
CounterThe single beat (9.4% positive surprise in the third-most-recent quarter) shows the company can post upside prints when conditions align, though an isolated beat amid a miss-heavy streak is insufficient to call a trend reversal.
CounterGeographic specialization in Florida phosphate may reflect genuine operational advantages in proximity to reserves; concentration in a region where the company holds scale advantages is not straightforwardly negative.
CounterDeep technical weakness in a commodity producer can sometimes coincide with a cyclical trough that precedes a sharp price recovery if the underlying commodity price rebounds; the current setup may reflect sentiment at an extreme rather than a structural decline.
CounterHigh payout ratios in commodity companies can be temporarily supported by accumulated cash reserves or asset realizations; management may view the elevated payout as a bridge to a recovery rather than a permanent structural mismatch.
Mosaic Company presents a structurally challenged investment case: business quality is well below the minimum threshold, free cash flow is deeply negative, earnings are predominantly missing estimates, and a confirmed technical downtrend compounds the risk profile — the setup does not support a new position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 4.5 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.2 |
| ROA | 1.3 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.3 |
| Net margin | 0.2 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 3.4 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 2.5 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 8.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.9 |
| quality rank | 1.2 |
| growth rank | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.0 |
| support resistance | 7.0 |
| 52w position | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.0 |
| days to cover | 8.2 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 3.2 |
| beta | 8.1 |
| debt equity | 8.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 4.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 50 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -43% (>40% off 52w high)
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 6.6 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.4<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 6.6, Sentiment at 6.2, and Growth at 6.1; the weakest are Quality at 2.1, Momentum at 2.4, and Catalyst at 3.2. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.57 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio rises above 50% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifInternational customer concentration falls below 50% of total revenue in the next annual filing.
Trip ifPrice closes above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading days.
Trip ifPayout ratio falls below 100% for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods.