Value
7.7/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.7 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.0 |
| PEG | 6.1 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.1x
- ▸PEG: 1.23
- ▸Attractively valued
LZB · Why this verdict
Why La-Z-Boy (LZB) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
With the stock at $37.78 against an analyst consensus target of $37.82, there is effectively no remaining upside to the published price target, and the risk/reward geometry has collapsed to near zero on the reward side. Bear case | Analyst price targets are revised upward to at least $42 within 12 months, restoring a meaningful gap to the current price. | →Stable |
| CounterA technical breakout pattern — golden cross, above all moving averages — can carry price through an exhausted analyst target if the fundamental update (earnings today) delivers a positive surprise. | ||
Earnings are reporting with zero days until the event, creating a binary outcome where positioning before the print carries the full asymmetry of a surprise in either direction with no ability to size the entry rationally. Engine gate (failed) | Post-earnings, the stock establishes a new base either above $40 on a beat or below $35 on a miss, allowing a fresh entry decision with known post-print data. | →Stable |
| CounterThe two most recent quarters were beats (the newest at a 2.8% beat, the one prior at a 31.5% beat), and an options put/call ratio of 3.25 may overstate downside risk if hedgers are simply protecting existing long positions. | ||
Free cash flow runs at 233% of net income, and the Piotroski financial health score stands at 8 out of 9, indicating a balance sheet capable of weathering a cyclical furniture demand downturn. Quality breakdown | FCF conversion stays above 150% of net income and the Piotroski score remains at or above 7 over the next four quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterThe business carries no assessed competitive moat, meaning that strong cash conversion in a cyclical sector reflects current demand conditions rather than a structural pricing or cost advantage that persists through downturns. | ||
A put/call ratio of 3.25 is sharply skewed toward downside protection, suggesting the options market is pricing in a meaningful probability of a negative earnings outcome or a post-print correction. Key risks | The put/call ratio compresses below 1.5 in the week following earnings, signaling that the hedging overhang has cleared. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated put/call ratios around earnings can reflect institutional hedging of existing long positions rather than directional bets, meaning the signal is more ambiguous than it appears on the surface. | ||
With the stock at $37.78 against an analyst consensus target of $37.82, there is effectively no remaining upside to the published price target, and the risk/reward geometry has collapsed to near zero on the reward side.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Analyst price targets are revised upward to at least $42 within 12 months, restoring a meaningful gap to the current price.
CounterA technical breakout pattern — golden cross, above all moving averages — can carry price through an exhausted analyst target if the fundamental update (earnings today) delivers a positive surprise.
Earnings are reporting with zero days until the event, creating a binary outcome where positioning before the print carries the full asymmetry of a surprise in either direction with no ability to size the entry rationally.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- Post-earnings, the stock establishes a new base either above $40 on a beat or below $35 on a miss, allowing a fresh entry decision with known post-print data.
CounterThe two most recent quarters were beats (the newest at a 2.8% beat, the one prior at a 31.5% beat), and an options put/call ratio of 3.25 may overstate downside risk if hedgers are simply protecting existing long positions.
Free cash flow runs at 233% of net income, and the Piotroski financial health score stands at 8 out of 9, indicating a balance sheet capable of weathering a cyclical furniture demand downturn.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- FCF conversion stays above 150% of net income and the Piotroski score remains at or above 7 over the next four quarters.
CounterThe business carries no assessed competitive moat, meaning that strong cash conversion in a cyclical sector reflects current demand conditions rather than a structural pricing or cost advantage that persists through downturns.
A put/call ratio of 3.25 is sharply skewed toward downside protection, suggesting the options market is pricing in a meaningful probability of a negative earnings outcome or a post-print correction.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- The put/call ratio compresses below 1.5 in the week following earnings, signaling that the hedging overhang has cleared.
CounterElevated put/call ratios around earnings can reflect institutional hedging of existing long positions rather than directional bets, meaning the signal is more ambiguous than it appears on the surface.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
La-Z-Boy sits at the analyst price target with earnings reporting today, leaving no measurable upside and a binary event risk that makes initiating or adding to a position unattractive despite a constructive technical setup and reasonable valuation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.3 |
| ROA | 3.2 |
| Gross margin | 4.9 |
| Op margin | 4.7 |
| Net margin | 2.4 |
| Current ratio | 6.4 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 174% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
6.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.5 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -0%
Momentum
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.1 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.9 |
| Price target | 7.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (2.0) — signal dampened
Insider
3.4/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Notable insider selling — $2,032,364 (0.128% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.9 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 3.8 |
Technical
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.6 |
| support resistance | 5.1 |
| 52w position | 7.8 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.1 |
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.3 |
| implied vol | 5.1 |
| beta | 5.9 |
| debt equity | 7.8 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 3 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 243.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:46d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.7<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.17
Upside
-2.0%
Downside
12.2%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 53 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.6B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.6B<$5B
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Value at 7.7; weakest: Insider at 3.4. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.7, Catalyst at 6.6, and Growth at 6.2; the weakest are Insider at 3.4, Momentum at 3.7, and Peer rank at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.17 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Price At Analyst Target
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $35, widening the negative gap to current price.
- P2Earnings Binary Event Today
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -10% on the report due today (earnings day).
- P3Solid Cash Conversion Piotroski
Trip ifFCF as a percentage of net income drops below 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Elevated Put Call Downside Skew
Trip ifPut/call ratio stays above 2.5 for more than 3 weeks post-earnings, suggesting persistent downside hedging.