Value
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.3 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.2 |
| PEG | 5.3 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 20.9x
- ▸PEG: 1.42
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Three of the last four reported quarters came in above consensus — with the most recent delivering a nearly 10% positive surprise and the prior two averaging roughly 8% — indicating management is consistently executing against operational targets. A golden cross and price above all major moving averages reinforce the constructive near-term backdrop. Earnings | Positive earnings surprises continue for the next two reported quarters, sustaining the three-quarter beat trend. | →Stable |
| CounterThe oldest quarter in the lookback period was a miss, meaning the current streak is three quarters rather than a multi-year record; any return of cost pressure or membership softness could easily interrupt it. | ||
Free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income — approximately -90% — meaning the business is not converting reported earnings into cash. This gap materially limits confidence in the sustainability of the profitability headline and flags a structural quality concern. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow relative to net income improves above 30% for two consecutive reported quarters, confirming the conversion gap is closing. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 and strong operating margin components suggest profitability fundamentals are otherwise healthy, indicating the cash flow deficit may reflect near-term capital deployment rather than a structural impairment. | ||
More than 70% of revenue derives from membership dues and enrollment fees, creating significant single-stream concentration; a sustained weakening in membership demand would disproportionately impair the top line with limited revenue diversification to offset it. Bear case | The share of revenue from membership dues and enrollment fees declines below 65% as alternative revenue streams grow to represent a larger proportion of total revenue. | →Stable |
| CounterRecurring membership fees are inherently sticky — high concentration in a predictable subscription-like revenue stream can support revenue visibility if retention rates remain strong. | ||
At current levels, the stock sits just 5.1% below the analyst-derived price target with a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.74 — under one unit of reward per unit of risk — making this an unfavorable entry point for initiating a new position. Price targets | The analyst consensus price target rises above $43 implying upside exceeding 25% from current levels, or a price decline of more than 10% restores a reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong technical momentum — golden cross, price above all major moving averages, RSI near 56 — could carry the stock to and through the analyst target before any pullback materializes, making the current level the lowest available cost basis. | ||
CounterThe oldest quarter in the lookback period was a miss, meaning the current streak is three quarters rather than a multi-year record; any return of cost pressure or membership softness could easily interrupt it.
CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 and strong operating margin components suggest profitability fundamentals are otherwise healthy, indicating the cash flow deficit may reflect near-term capital deployment rather than a structural impairment.
CounterRecurring membership fees are inherently sticky — high concentration in a predictable subscription-like revenue stream can support revenue visibility if retention rates remain strong.
CounterStrong technical momentum — golden cross, price above all major moving averages, RSI near 56 — could carry the stock to and through the analyst target before any pullback materializes, making the current level the lowest available cost basis.
Life Time operates a fitness membership business delivering three of its last four quarters above consensus with a positive technical backdrop, but free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income, revenue is heavily concentrated in dues and enrollment fees, and with only 5.1% headroom to the analyst target and a reward-to-risk ratio below 1, the current entry point offers insufficient upside relative to the potential drawdown.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.3 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.2 |
| PEG | 5.3 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.3 |
| ROA | 2.7 |
| Gross margin | 5.6 |
| Op margin | 6.8 |
| Net margin | 6.3 |
| Current ratio | 2.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.4 |
| EPS growth | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.1 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 8.6 |
| Price target | 6.0 |
| erm sentiment | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.2 |
| quality rank | 7.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.8 |
| support resistance | 1.0 |
| 52w position | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.4 |
| days to cover | 7.0 |
| volatility | 3.9 |
| put call | 5.0 |
| implied vol | 5.9 |
| beta | 5.0 |
| debt equity | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.2 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.51>1.3
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 6.7) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.5=NEGATIVE, INSIDER:13.70%=EXTREME) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.46 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.7, Catalyst at 6.5, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.5; the weakest are Insider at 3.1, Technical at 4.1, and Quality at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.46 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow relative to net income rises above 30% for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
Trip ifRevenue from membership dues and enrollment fees falls below 65% of total revenue for 2 consecutive reporting periods.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $43 implying more than 25% upside from current price, or price declines more than 10% from current levels.