Value
4.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.0 |
| P/S | 7.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 4.9 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.3x
- ▸PEG: 1.64
LII · Why this verdict
Why Lennox International (LII) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company generates a return on equity of 77% and operating margins of 15%, ranking best-in-class on profitability within its peer group — a track record of high-return capital allocation that has historically supported a premium valuation. Quality breakdown | Return on equity stays above 50% and operating margins hold above 12% over the next four quarters, confirming the profitability advantage is durable. | →Stable |
| CounterA debt-to-equity ratio of 1.6 amplifies the reported return on equity mechanically; free cash flow converts at only 24% of net income — flagged as a quality concern — suggesting that headline returns overstate the true cash-generation profile available to shareholders. | ||
Three of the four most recently reported quarters resulted in earnings beats, with an average positive surprise of 3.9% — a record of modest but consistent above-expectations delivery that reflects disciplined guidance. Earnings | The earnings beat streak extends to four or more consecutive quarters and the average positive surprise remains above 3% over the next two reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterThe second most recent quarter produced a miss of -5.74%, showing the company is not immune to shortfalls; at a forward P/E near 20x, even modest misses can reprice the stock meaningfully. | ||
About 1.4% of headroom remains to the near-term resistance target, and the reward-to-risk ratio at current levels is 0.2-to-1 — meaning the potential downside to support is roughly five times the remaining upside — making the current setup unfavorable for new positions. Price targets | A pullback of at least 8% from current levels, or a meaningful upward revision to analyst price targets, restores the reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5-to-1, creating a more attractive entry. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong momentum — RSI at 59, bullish MACD, volume accumulation, and the stock trading above its 200-day moving average — can carry prices through near-term resistance; sustained earnings beats could prompt target upgrades that reset the geometry without requiring a price pullback. | ||
Revenue and earnings growth are both running soft relative to peers, ranking in the lower half of the competitive set — a dynamic that constrains the multiple-expansion case and makes the current valuation reliant on quality alone, without growth as a secondary tailwind. Bear case | Revenue growth accelerates meaningfully over the next two quarters, lifting the growth profile above the peer median and providing an additional fundamental catalyst alongside the quality premium. | →Stable |
| CounterA best-in-class quality business can sustain a premium multiple without strong revenue growth if earnings per share keep expanding through margin improvement and capital return — both of which are plausible given the company's high return on equity and consistent buyback history. | ||
The company generates a return on equity of 77% and operating margins of 15%, ranking best-in-class on profitability within its peer group — a track record of high-return capital allocation that has historically supported a premium valuation.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Return on equity stays above 50% and operating margins hold above 12% over the next four quarters, confirming the profitability advantage is durable.
CounterA debt-to-equity ratio of 1.6 amplifies the reported return on equity mechanically; free cash flow converts at only 24% of net income — flagged as a quality concern — suggesting that headline returns overstate the true cash-generation profile available to shareholders.
Three of the four most recently reported quarters resulted in earnings beats, with an average positive surprise of 3.9% — a record of modest but consistent above-expectations delivery that reflects disciplined guidance.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The earnings beat streak extends to four or more consecutive quarters and the average positive surprise remains above 3% over the next two reporting periods.
CounterThe second most recent quarter produced a miss of -5.74%, showing the company is not immune to shortfalls; at a forward P/E near 20x, even modest misses can reprice the stock meaningfully.
About 1.4% of headroom remains to the near-term resistance target, and the reward-to-risk ratio at current levels is 0.2-to-1 — meaning the potential downside to support is roughly five times the remaining upside — making the current setup unfavorable for new positions.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- A pullback of at least 8% from current levels, or a meaningful upward revision to analyst price targets, restores the reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5-to-1, creating a more attractive entry.
CounterStrong momentum — RSI at 59, bullish MACD, volume accumulation, and the stock trading above its 200-day moving average — can carry prices through near-term resistance; sustained earnings beats could prompt target upgrades that reset the geometry without requiring a price pullback.
Revenue and earnings growth are both running soft relative to peers, ranking in the lower half of the competitive set — a dynamic that constrains the multiple-expansion case and makes the current valuation reliant on quality alone, without growth as a secondary tailwind.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue growth accelerates meaningfully over the next two quarters, lifting the growth profile above the peer median and providing an additional fundamental catalyst alongside the quality premium.
CounterA best-in-class quality business can sustain a premium multiple without strong revenue growth if earnings per share keep expanding through margin improvement and capital return — both of which are plausible given the company's high return on equity and consistent buyback history.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Lennox International is a high-quality industrial business with a return on equity of 77% and consistent earnings execution, but with the current price sitting about 1.4% below near-term resistance and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.2-to-1, the setup strongly favors waiting for a better entry over adding exposure at current levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 10.0 |
| Gross margin | 2.6 |
| Op margin | 5.7 |
| Net margin | 7.5 |
| Current ratio | 5.7 |
| FCF quality | 1.9 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 77%
- ▸Strong margins: 15%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 24% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
2.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.9 |
| EPS growth | 0.5 |
Momentum
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 5.5 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 70)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat
Sentiment
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.2 |
| Price target | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Negligible insider selling — $529,001 (0.003% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.8 |
| quality rank | 9.2 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
3.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.5 |
| support resistance | 1.8 |
| 52w position | 6.7 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.5 |
| days to cover | 3.8 |
| volatility | 4.0 |
| put call | 8.8 |
| implied vol | 5.4 |
| beta | 6.3 |
| debt equity | 3.8 |
Catalyst
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.4 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 95.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:5.8>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:25d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.94
Upside
-12.9%
Downside
13.6%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 25d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 6.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.94 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 6.3, Sentiment at 5.9, and Momentum at 5.8; the weakest are Growth at 2.2, Technical at 3.3, and Value at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.94 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Consistent Earnings Execution
Trip ifAverage quarterly EPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Best In Class Returns And Margins
Trip ifOperating margins compress below 10% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Price At Resistance Poor Geometry
Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio improves above 1.5-to-1 as the stock pulls back more than 10% from current levels or analyst price targets rise more than 15% above current consensus.
- P4Soft Revenue And Earnings Growth
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 8% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling a meaningful acceleration from the current soft trend.