Skip to main content
JNJJohnson & JohnsonHold5.4·$267.61
JNJ · Why this verdict

Why Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

A high-quality healthcare franchise with strong margins, a wide economic moat, and strong price momentum has already surpassed its near-term resistance target, leaving the risk/reward unfavorable for new exposure; the setup favors holding an existing position while monitoring the dividend sustainability concern and the most recent earnings miss.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The business sustains strong margins (22%), a return on equity of 26%, and a wide economic moat — a combination indicating durable competitive positioning. A Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 confirms broad financial health.

↑Improving
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Margins remain at or above current levels over the next four quarters as the competitive position is maintained.

CounterFree cash flow converts at only 59% of reported earnings, a concern the quality data explicitly flags; the gap between reported profitability and cash generation means the stated margins may overstate real cash returns, and if FCF conversion continues to lag, the quality franchise story becomes harder to sustain.

The technical configuration shows a golden cross, price trading above all major moving averages, an RSI of 58, and a bullish MACD — collectively consistent with a sustained breakout pattern driven by institutional buying accumulation.

↑Improving
Engine gate (passed)
Expectation
Price holds above its 200-day moving average and volume accumulation continues over the next 12 months.

CounterThe stock is already trading above its near-term resistance target, and the risk/reward is unfavorable at current levels; momentum that has already run past the target may lose its catalyst and consolidate or retrace as near-term buyers take profits.

The dividend is flagged as a potential yield trap — a situation where a high stated yield may prove difficult to sustain if earnings or cash flows deteriorate, posing a risk to income-focused holders.

→Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
If this risk materializes, the dividend would be reduced or covered less comfortably, weakening the income case for holding.

CounterThe wide economic moat and Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 indicate the underlying franchise has financial durability; if cash conversion improves from 59% of reported earnings, the dividend may prove better-supported than the current yield-trap flag suggests.

Earnings estimates are trending upward, providing a positive revision tailwind that can sustain the current valuation even as trailing growth remains soft.

↑Improving
Bull case
Expectation
Consensus EPS estimates continue rising over the next four quarters, validating the upward revision trend.

CounterThe most recent quarter delivered a miss of -5.86%, preceded by an inline result; two consecutive shortfalls against consensus could stall or reverse the estimate revision cycle that the upward trend depends on.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E3.1
P/S6.0
EV/EBITDA0.6
Fwd P/E5.8
PEG3.8
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 22.2x
  • ▸PEG: 2.82

Quality

8.4/10data confidence 71%
ComponentSub-score
Gross margin9.6
Op margin10.0
Net margin8.1
Moat6.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸Strong margins: 16%
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
  • ▸High-quality business

Growth

2.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.0
EPS growth0.0

Momentum

8.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume5.3
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment4.1
Analyst rating7.5
Price target5.7

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.0
  • ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $61,986,737 (0.010% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.3
quality rank5.6
growth rank5.6

Technical

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.8
support resistance2.2
52w position9.0
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.5
days to cover7.3
volatility6.0
put call4.1
implied vol7.1
max pain risk3.0
beta10.0
debt equity7.5
  • ▸Above max pain $135

Catalyst

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.1
dividend safety3.5
news activity8.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:8.0>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:96d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.72
Upside
-6.0%
Downside
8.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 60, MACD bullish

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityConservative — Beta 0.21<0.8, Div 2.1%, Q=8.4

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:8.0>=5.5. Top dim: Quality at 8.4; weakest: Growth at 2.0. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.4, Momentum at 8.0, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8; the weakest are Growth at 2.0, Value at 4.0, and Technical at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.72 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Quality Margins Moat

    Trip ifMargins fall below 15% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Strong Technical Breakout Setup

    Trip ifRSI falls below 40 for 2 consecutive weeks.

  • P3Dividend Yield Safety Concern

    Trip ifFCF as a percentage of net income rises above 80% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Earnings Estimate Revision Trend

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › JNJ › Why this verdict