Skip to main content
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.Sell6.0·$84.56
IR · Why this verdict

Why Ingersoll Rand (IR) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Ingersoll Rand presents an unusually strong balance sheet — perfect financial health score and free cash flow conversion of 176% — but the current price geometry offers only 9.3% upside against 11.3% potential downside, and the stock remains in a confirmed near-term downtrend, making the setup unfavorable until asymmetry improves.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The business achieves a perfect 9-out-of-9 financial health score and converts 176% of net income into free cash flow, both marks that sit well above typical industrial-sector peers and indicate a financially durable franchise.

↑Improving
Quality breakdown
Expectation
The financial health score remains at 8 or above and free cash flow conversion stays above 130% over the next four reported quarters.

CounterHigh balance-sheet scores can lag fundamental deterioration; the forward multiple of 20x prices in continued execution, and any deceleration in margins or cash generation would be punished at this valuation.

At current prices the stock offers approximately 9.3% upside against 11.3% potential downside, a ratio of roughly 0.8-to-1 that is well short of the minimum 1.5-to-1 needed to justify a new position.

↑Improving
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
The reward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5-to-1 through either a price pullback or meaningful upward revision in analyst targets within the next 6 months.

CounterThe asymmetry can improve quickly if a positive earnings catalyst compresses the downside estimate; the current setup is a timing issue, not a fundamental impairment of the underlying business.

While the 200-day moving average slope is still declining, the MACD is improving and on-balance volume is rising, suggesting early accumulation that may precede a broader technical recovery.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The stock crosses back above the 200-day moving average on rising volume and sustains the breakout for at least 3 consecutive weeks.

CounterThe moving average slope is still declining at -1.6% over 30 days in a confirmed downtrend; an improving MACD alone has not confirmed a trend change and price must follow before the recovery is real.

With 58% of revenues generated outside the United States and single-source dependencies for key iron castings and motors, the business carries meaningful concentration risk that could impair earnings if either exposure is disrupted.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
International revenue share stays below 62% and no single-source supply disruption is disclosed in upcoming 10-K filings.

CounterGeographic diversification also acts as a growth driver in international markets; long-standing single-source supplier relationships often embed switching costs that reduce — rather than increase — actual procurement risk over time.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.5
P/S7.6
EV/EBITDA1.4
Fwd P/E6.2
PEG9.1
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 20.9x
  • ▸PEG: 0.65

Quality

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.5
ROA3.3
Gross margin4.5
Op margin7.5
Net margin8.6
Current ratio6.1
FCF quality5.6
Moat6.2
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Strong margins: 17%
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 73% FCF/NI
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

7.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.9
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

7.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position8.0
Volume5.2
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.5
Analyst rating7.2
Price target6.6

Insider

4.5/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.6
notable moves3.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.2
quality rank6.9
growth rank2.8
  • ▸Best-in-class margins

Technical

2.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.5
52w position6.8

Risk (lower is worse)

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.8
days to cover7.7
volatility4.6
put call0.0
implied vol6.3
max pain risk3.0
beta6.4
debt equity8.1
  • ▸Elevated put/call: 5.75
  • ▸Above max pain $40
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.8
dividend safety8.5
news activity7.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 0.1% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:7.6>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:100d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=7.6>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
-0.22
Upside
-3.2%
Downside
14.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupMomentum Cont — Trend continuation, RSI 68, MACD bullish

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.22 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.6, Growth at 7.0, and Catalyst at 6.9; the weakest are Technical at 2.4, Insider at 4.5, and Peer rank at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.22 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Exceptional Balance Sheet Quality

    Trip ifFinancial health score falls below 7 for 2 consecutive reported quarters.

  • P2Unfavorable Reward Risk Geometry

    Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5-to-1 following a price decline of more than 8% from current levels.

  • P3Early Signs Of Momentum Recovery

    Trip ifRSI closes below 40 for 3 or more consecutive weeks, confirming the momentum recovery has stalled.

  • P4Geographic And Supplier Concentration

    Trip ifInternational revenue falls below 50% of total in an annual filing, materially reducing geographic concentration.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › IR › Why this verdict