Value
8.3/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.15
- ▸Attractively valued
HP · Why this verdict
Why Helmerich & Payne (HP) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Approximately 63% of company revenue is concentrated in North American drilling operations, making the business highly sensitive to a single regional commodity market and creating a high-severity geographic exposure flagged in company disclosures. Bear case | Over 12 months, the North American segment's revenue contribution falls below 55% of total company revenue, reflecting meaningful geographic diversification. | →Stable |
| CounterDeep operational expertise in a concentrated geography can also function as a competitive advantage; the company may be the most technically proficient or cost-effective operator in that region, making the concentration a feature of its competitive position in a recovery scenario. | ||
The business scores 2.6 out of 10 on overall quality — below the 4.0 minimum floor for investment consideration — reflecting weak gross and operating margins, a return on equity near zero, and the absence of any recognized competitive moat despite a strong Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9. Quality breakdown | Over 12 months, operating and gross margins improve enough to lift the overall quality score above 4.0, and the company demonstrates a defensible competitive position in its core drilling market. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9 signals strong balance-sheet discipline and improving financial health metrics, which could foreshadow a margin recovery and quality score rebound as the drilling cycle turns. | ||
The company has missed analyst consensus earnings estimates in three of its last four reported quarters — including misses of -840%, -242%, and -104% versus estimates — with the trailing four-quarter average EPS surprise at approximately negative 296%, indicating the business is consistently delivering well below expectations. Earnings | The miss pattern would reverse if the company posts positive EPS surprises in 2 of the next 3 quarters, signaling that the cost structure or revenue trajectory has improved meaningfully. | →Stable |
| CounterThe single beat in the oldest of the four quarters (3.1% surprise) demonstrates the business can hit targets when the pricing and activity environment cooperates; a recovery in North American drilling activity could rapidly reset expectations and produce positive surprises. | ||
Revenue has declined approximately 8% year-over-year, reflecting weak demand in the North American drilling market, with no identifiable near-term catalyst visible in the data to reverse that trajectory. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive above 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating demand has stabilized and the cyclical downturn has passed. | →Stable |
| CounterRig-count cycles can turn quickly when commodity prices recover; a meaningful improvement in energy prices could drive drilling activity and revenue higher faster than the current annual decline rate implies. | ||
Approximately 63% of company revenue is concentrated in North American drilling operations, making the business highly sensitive to a single regional commodity market and creating a high-severity geographic exposure flagged in company disclosures.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Over 12 months, the North American segment's revenue contribution falls below 55% of total company revenue, reflecting meaningful geographic diversification.
CounterDeep operational expertise in a concentrated geography can also function as a competitive advantage; the company may be the most technically proficient or cost-effective operator in that region, making the concentration a feature of its competitive position in a recovery scenario.
The business scores 2.6 out of 10 on overall quality — below the 4.0 minimum floor for investment consideration — reflecting weak gross and operating margins, a return on equity near zero, and the absence of any recognized competitive moat despite a strong Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Over 12 months, operating and gross margins improve enough to lift the overall quality score above 4.0, and the company demonstrates a defensible competitive position in its core drilling market.
CounterA Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9 signals strong balance-sheet discipline and improving financial health metrics, which could foreshadow a margin recovery and quality score rebound as the drilling cycle turns.
The company has missed analyst consensus earnings estimates in three of its last four reported quarters — including misses of -840%, -242%, and -104% versus estimates — with the trailing four-quarter average EPS surprise at approximately negative 296%, indicating the business is consistently delivering well below expectations.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The miss pattern would reverse if the company posts positive EPS surprises in 2 of the next 3 quarters, signaling that the cost structure or revenue trajectory has improved meaningfully.
CounterThe single beat in the oldest of the four quarters (3.1% surprise) demonstrates the business can hit targets when the pricing and activity environment cooperates; a recovery in North American drilling activity could rapidly reset expectations and produce positive surprises.
Revenue has declined approximately 8% year-over-year, reflecting weak demand in the North American drilling market, with no identifiable near-term catalyst visible in the data to reverse that trajectory.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive above 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating demand has stabilized and the cyclical downturn has passed.
CounterRig-count cycles can turn quickly when commodity prices recover; a meaningful improvement in energy prices could drive drilling activity and revenue higher faster than the current annual decline rate implies.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Helmerich and Payne faces a challenging combination of quality well below minimum investment thresholds, three earnings misses in its last four reported quarters, and declining revenues of approximately 8% year-over-year — factors that together argue for caution despite the stock's apparent valuation appeal and its technically strong positioning at support levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.7 |
| Gross margin | 2.3 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.1 |
| Moat | 3.2 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
5.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.5 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -8%
Momentum
1.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 3.3 |
- ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 18, below 200MA)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+9.7%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
Sentiment
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.5 |
| Analyst rating | 7.3 |
| Price target | 8.7 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 32%
Insider
4.8/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $1,174,900 (0.038% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.6 |
| quality rank | 1.1 |
| growth rank | 3.3 |
Technical
7.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.0 |
| support resistance | 9.4 |
| 52w position | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.6 |
| days to cover | 3.7 |
| volatility | 0.4 |
| put call | 9.3 |
| implied vol | 2.5 |
| beta | 9.4 |
| debt equity | 6.4 |
- ▸High IV: 65%
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (5)
- ASYMMETRY:1.9>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:31d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.91
Upside
+18.5%
Downside
9.7%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.1B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 8.3 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.3, Technical at 7.8, and Sentiment at 6.5; the weakest are Momentum at 1.9, Quality at 2.6, and Catalyst at 3.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.91 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Quality Below Minimum Threshold
Trip ifOverall quality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Persistent Earnings Miss Pattern
Trip ifEPS surprise rises above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Declining Revenue Trajectory
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive above 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Geographic Concentration North America
Trip ifNorth American Solutions segment revenue falls below 55% of total company revenue for 2 consecutive quarters.