HIGHBuilt-inGeographic
81%
Utica/Marcellus
“10-K Item 1: 'we produced approximately 841 MMcfe per day net to our interests in Utica/Marcellus and it accounted for approximately 81% of our total production.'”
GPOR · Concentration risk · 10-K extracted
Gulfport Energy (GPOR) concentration risks
Updated
The most significant concentration Gulfport Energy discloses is Utica/Marcellus at 81%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Gulfport Energy’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
At a glance
Disclosed-size breakdown · 3 disclosed concentrations
HIGH2
MEDIUM1
LOW0
Disclosed concentrations
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
HIGHBuilt-inGeographic
eastern Ohio and central Oklahoma
“10-K Item 1A: 'All of our producing properties are located in eastern Ohio and central Oklahoma, making us vulnerable to risks associated with operating in only these regions.'”
MEDIUMBuilt-inCommodity
natural gas
“10-K Item 1: 'Gulfport is an independent natural gas-weighted exploration and production company with assets primarily located in the Appalachia and Anadarko basins.'”
TrendMatrix Research · concentration synthesis
What these concentrations mean together
updated 2026-06-24The company's concentration profile is almost entirely geographic in character, with structural exposures at both the basin and the operating-region level that compound each other. The Utica/Marcellus acreage accounted for approximately 81% of total production, a large share that anchors the production base to Appalachian natural gas dynamics — pricing realizations, gathering infrastructure, and basis differentials in that region. Layered on the basin concentration is a broader geographic exposure: all producing properties are located in eastern Ohio and central Oklahoma, a large-share constraint the company itself acknowledges creates vulnerability to risks specific to those two regions. Weather events, pipeline outages, regulatory actions at the state level, or infrastructure disruptions in either geography have no other operating area to offset them. The third disclosed element is the commodity tilt toward natural gas, a moderate-share structural exposure reflecting the company's strategic identity as a natural gas-weighted producer. This is consistent with and predictable from the Appalachian and Anadarko basin positioning, where natural gas is the dominant output. The commodity exposure does not add a new dimension of risk but reinforces the geographic picture: the company's financial results are doubly levered to Appalachian natural gas prices, once through basin-level production concentration and once through the underlying commodity mix. Together, these three structural exposures create a profile that is tightly correlated — basin, region, and commodity all move together. There is no disclosed customer or supplier concentration layered on top.
For the engine’s reasoning on GPOR’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
Industry peers · Oil & Gas E&P
Peer concentration profile
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKV | BKV Corporation | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CHRD | Chord Energy Corporation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPOR● | Gulfport Energy Corporation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| BSM | Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| APA | APA Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AR | Antero Resources Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.