Value
9.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.9 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.22
- ▸Attractively valued
FUTU · Why this verdict
Why Futu Holdings (FUTU) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score7.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a forward P/E of 8.2 times and a PEG ratio of 0.23, the stock prices in substantially less growth than the 29% year-over-year revenue trajectory implies, creating a material valuation gap that analyst consensus places at roughly 48% above the current price. Valuation breakdown | Revenue growth should remain above 15% for the next 2 reported quarters to confirm the discount reflects genuine undervaluation rather than over-optimistic baseline estimates. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarterly miss was severe; if it marks the beginning of a deceleration, consensus estimates may be revised lower, narrowing or eliminating the apparent valuation gap without any improvement in price. | ||
The business earns a return on equity of 28%, operates with net margins of 45%, holds a Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9, and carries a wide economic moat — a quality profile that can sustain compounding value across multiple market cycles. Quality breakdown | Net margin remains above 35% and return on equity above 20% for the next 4 reported quarters, confirming the competitive position is intact. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter produced a significant miss versus expectations — the first stumble after three prior beats — raising the possibility that the margin and growth assumptions embedded in the wide-moat assessment are being challenged by competitive or regulatory pressure. | ||
The stock is below its 200-day moving average, which is declining at 4.2% per month — a confirmed downtrend that blocks new entry irrespective of fundamental quality and requires chart confirmation before the favorable risk/reward can be acted on. Momentum breakdown | The technical barrier lifts when the stock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for at least 3 consecutive weeks. | →Stable |
| CounterOn-balance volume is rising and the MACD is positive, suggesting institutional accumulation is already underway at current levels; such conditions have historically preceded a 200-day moving average reclaim by several weeks, potentially pulling forward the entry window. | ||
Revenue is growing at 29% year-over-year, and three of the four most recently reported quarters produced earnings beats — though the most recent quarter fell significantly short of expectations, introducing uncertainty about whether the growth rate is decelerating. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should sustain above 20% for at least the next 2 reported quarters to confirm the trajectory remains intact. | →Stable |
| CounterA hard-block technical signal, 12% short interest, and an elevated put/call ratio of 1.69 collectively signal that a meaningful share of the market does not trust the continuity of the growth rate — a second consecutive miss would materially challenge the growth thesis. | ||
At a forward P/E of 8.2 times and a PEG ratio of 0.23, the stock prices in substantially less growth than the 29% year-over-year revenue trajectory implies, creating a material valuation gap that analyst consensus places at roughly 48% above the current price.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should remain above 15% for the next 2 reported quarters to confirm the discount reflects genuine undervaluation rather than over-optimistic baseline estimates.
CounterThe most recent quarterly miss was severe; if it marks the beginning of a deceleration, consensus estimates may be revised lower, narrowing or eliminating the apparent valuation gap without any improvement in price.
The business earns a return on equity of 28%, operates with net margins of 45%, holds a Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9, and carries a wide economic moat — a quality profile that can sustain compounding value across multiple market cycles.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Net margin remains above 35% and return on equity above 20% for the next 4 reported quarters, confirming the competitive position is intact.
CounterThe most recent quarter produced a significant miss versus expectations — the first stumble after three prior beats — raising the possibility that the margin and growth assumptions embedded in the wide-moat assessment are being challenged by competitive or regulatory pressure.
The stock is below its 200-day moving average, which is declining at 4.2% per month — a confirmed downtrend that blocks new entry irrespective of fundamental quality and requires chart confirmation before the favorable risk/reward can be acted on.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- The technical barrier lifts when the stock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for at least 3 consecutive weeks.
CounterOn-balance volume is rising and the MACD is positive, suggesting institutional accumulation is already underway at current levels; such conditions have historically preceded a 200-day moving average reclaim by several weeks, potentially pulling forward the entry window.
Revenue is growing at 29% year-over-year, and three of the four most recently reported quarters produced earnings beats — though the most recent quarter fell significantly short of expectations, introducing uncertainty about whether the growth rate is decelerating.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should sustain above 20% for at least the next 2 reported quarters to confirm the trajectory remains intact.
CounterA hard-block technical signal, 12% short interest, and an elevated put/call ratio of 1.69 collectively signal that a meaningful share of the market does not trust the continuity of the growth rate — a second consecutive miss would materially challenge the growth thesis.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
A high-quality brokerage with a wide economic moat, 45% net margins, 29% year-over-year revenue growth, and a forward P/E of 8.2 times sits roughly 48% below analyst consensus with a favorable risk/reward of nearly 8-to-1 — but a technical death cross and a sharp recent earnings miss mean the setup rewards patience over immediacy, requiring chart confirmation before the fundamental case can be fully acted on.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
8.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.3 |
| ROA | 3.1 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.4 |
| Moat | 8.2 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 28%
- ▸Strong margins: 45%
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
Growth
9.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 9.7 |
| EPS growth | 9.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 29% YoY
Momentum
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 1.0 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -7.1%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.8 |
| erm sentiment | 4.3 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 65%
Insider
5.8/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.5 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.3 |
| quality rank | 8.9 |
| growth rank | 6.2 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
2.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.3 |
| support resistance | 3.9 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.1 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.4 |
| put call | 6.1 |
| implied vol | 2.5 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 7.7 |
- ▸High IV: 65%
- ▸Above max pain $65
Catalyst
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 273.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
News gate: flagged → wait (4 risks, 1 concerns).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_C_QUALITY_VALUE|NEWS_GATE:FLAGGEDPassed (10)
- MOMENTUM:5.9>=5.5
- ASYMMETRY:5.0>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- DEATH_CROSS:QUALITY_MOMENTUM_EXEMPT
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:44d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- SECTOR_CONCENTRATION_CAP:sector=Financial Services:3/10
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- DEATH_CROSS:quality=8.0>=7.5+momentum=5.9>=5.0 exempted
Reward-to-Risk
5.02
Upside
+48.4%
Downside
9.6%
Sizing output
HALF
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 51
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -51% (>40% off 52w high)
Investment implication
The C-path quality+value combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 8.0 and value 9.5 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of 5.02 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.5, Growth at 9.3, and Quality at 8.0; the weakest are Technical at 2.4, Catalyst at 4.5, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.5. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 5.02 and an engine sizing output of HALF.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Wide Moat High Margin Quality
Trip ifNet margin falls below 30% for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
- P2Deep Value Versus Growth Rate
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
- P3Technical Death Cross Hard Block
Trip ifStock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for 3 consecutive weeks, confirming the technical barrier has lifted.
- P4Strong Revenue Growth Trajectory
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive reported quarters.