Skip to main content
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.Hold5.6·$162.55-1.23%
FCN · Why this verdict

Why FTI Consulting (FCN) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

FTI Consulting has demonstrated consistent earnings outperformance in three of the last four quarters, but a confirmed price downtrend, a death cross technical breakdown, and a near-exhausted take-profit target combine to make the current reward-to-risk geometry unattractive for new exposure.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Three of the last four quarters came in ahead of consensus with an average positive surprise of approximately 14%, reflecting a pattern of delivering results above expectations — though the most recent quarter reversed this pattern with a miss of roughly 8%.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
EPS beats resume in the next two quarters, with average positive surprise returning above 5% on a trailing four-quarter basis.

CounterThe most recent quarter's miss signals the beat pattern may be breaking down; two back-to-back misses would dismantle the earnings support narrative and call the 14% average surprise into question.

The stock trades below its 200-day moving average with the average slope declining at approximately 1.1% over the past month — a configuration consistent with a confirmed downtrend — while a death cross has triggered a hard technical block against new exposure.

Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
For momentum to improve, the 200-day moving average slope would need to flatten and turn positive while price re-establishes sustainably above that level.

CounterThe MACD has been showing internal improvement and the RSI has climbed to 58, suggesting early recovery momentum that could precede a technical reversal even while the moving average remains suppressed.

With the stock sitting just 2% below its resistance-derived take-profit target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.31-to-1, the current entry geometry offers nearly no reward relative to the downside — a setup well below any reasonable asymmetry threshold.

TrippedDeteriorating
Price targets
Expectation
A reset to an attractive setup would require the stock to pull back such that upside to the take-profit target expands beyond 15%, restoring a reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5-to-1.

CounterIf the underlying business trajectory improves and analyst price targets are revised upward, the take-profit ceiling could shift materially higher, reopening upside without requiring a price correction.

The company carries a perfect Piotroski financial health score of 9 out of 9, indicating broad-based accounting strength across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency — a quality floor that limits the probability of a fundamental deterioration scenario.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Piotroski F-Score remains at 8 or 9 over the next four quarters, with free cash flow quality score sustaining above 5.

CounterA high Piotroski score does not protect against multiple compression; with price momentum in a confirmed downtrend, even strong financial quality may not attract incremental buyers in the near term.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.6/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E6.7
P/S9.5
EV/EBITDA4.3
Fwd P/E8.1
PEG4.9
  • Forward P/E: 14.6x
  • PEG: 1.58

Quality

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.7
ROA4.8
Gross margin2.4
Op margin3.4
Net margin3.4
Current ratio7.9
FCF quality6.3
Moat5.5
Piotroski F10.0
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

4.3/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.9
EPS growth3.8

Momentum

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.2
MACD10.0
OBV6.3
MA position6.5
Volume0.0
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope flat

Sentiment

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.9
Price target5.9
erm sentiment5.0
  • Light analyst coverage (2.0) — signal dampened

Insider

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality6.5
insider conviction8.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Modest insider buying — $2,076,584 (0.042% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.8/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.4
quality rank3.6
growth rank3.8

Technical

3.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.7
support resistance1.6
52w position7.2

Risk (lower is worse)

6.2/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
short interest5.0
days to cover7.3
volatility5.1
debt equity7.4

Catalyst

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg9.5
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Earnings in 10 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE
Warning (3)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=5.2>=5.0 recovering
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:10d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.67
Upside
-10.1%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 68

EdgeCatalyst-Driven Earnings in 10d with 3/4 beat streak

SuitabilityAggressive MCap $4.9B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:5.2>=4.5. Top dim: Insider at 7.9; weakest: Technical at 3.5. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.9, Value at 6.6, and Catalyst at 6.5; the weakest are Technical at 3.5, Growth at 4.3, and Peer rank at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 3 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.67 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Earnings Beat Track Record

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Confirmed Price Downtrend

    Trip ifPrice reclaims the 200-day moving average and the MA slope turns positive above 0% for 4 consecutive weeks.

  • P3Exhausted Reward Risk GeometryTripped

    Trip ifUpside to the resistance-based take-profit target expands beyond 15% from current price, with reward-to-risk ratio crossing above 1.5-to-1.

  • P4Financial Health Quality Floor

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score drops below 7 for 2 consecutive quarterly reporting periods.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks FCN Why this verdict