Value
5.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.3 |
| P/S | 7.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.9 |
| PEG | 3.7 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 18.3x
- ▸PEG: 3.04
D · Why this verdict
Why Dominion Energy (D) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
All four of the last four quarters produced earnings above expectations, with a positive surprise pattern averaging roughly 7% that suggests management's guidance is disciplined and execution is reliable. Bull case | The beat streak extends to five consecutive quarters when the next result is reported, with estimates continuing to trend upward. | →Stable |
| CounterThe magnitude of recent beats has been modest, so the streak may reflect conservatively set guidance rather than genuine outperformance; one quarter of adverse weather impact or regulatory timing could break the pattern without any underlying deterioration. | ||
Despite 17% operating margins, free cash flow is deeply negative — running at -337% of net income — meaning the company is not converting accounting profits into cash, which raises a material concern about whether the dividend is sustainably covered. Quality breakdown | If this thesis is wrong and the capital cycle turns, free cash flow turns positive for at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, demonstrating that cash conversion is on a path toward covering the dividend. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities often carry negative free cash flow during heavy infrastructure investment cycles; if the capital program delivers on its rate base expansion, cash conversion could normalize toward positive territory within a few years. | ||
The stock is trading above its near-term resistance target, leaving a negative implied return to that level and an unfavorable risk/reward that caps near-term appreciation potential for new positions. Price targets | This pillar is falsified if a structural catalyst drives analyst consensus targets above $75, creating more than 10% implied upside from the current price. | →Stable |
| CounterUtilities often trade on dividend yield dynamics rather than near-term price targets; if long-term interest rates decline, the stock can sustain a premium to resistance levels as yield-seeking investors bid up the shares. | ||
With approximately 80% of operations concentrated in Virginia and roughly 95% of revenue under state-regulated utility structures, the company's earnings are highly sensitive to a single regulatory regime — any adverse commission ruling could impair earnings across the vast majority of the business simultaneously. Bear case | This pillar is falsified if Virginia operations fall below 65% of total revenue over 2 consecutive fiscal years, demonstrating that meaningful geographic diversification is underway. | →Stable |
| CounterConcentration in a single well-understood regulatory jurisdiction can be a stability advantage; a constructive and longstanding relationship with the Virginia State Corporation Commission may reduce regulatory uncertainty rather than amplify it. | ||
All four of the last four quarters produced earnings above expectations, with a positive surprise pattern averaging roughly 7% that suggests management's guidance is disciplined and execution is reliable.
→StableBull case
- Expectation
- The beat streak extends to five consecutive quarters when the next result is reported, with estimates continuing to trend upward.
CounterThe magnitude of recent beats has been modest, so the streak may reflect conservatively set guidance rather than genuine outperformance; one quarter of adverse weather impact or regulatory timing could break the pattern without any underlying deterioration.
Despite 17% operating margins, free cash flow is deeply negative — running at -337% of net income — meaning the company is not converting accounting profits into cash, which raises a material concern about whether the dividend is sustainably covered.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- If this thesis is wrong and the capital cycle turns, free cash flow turns positive for at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, demonstrating that cash conversion is on a path toward covering the dividend.
CounterRegulated utilities often carry negative free cash flow during heavy infrastructure investment cycles; if the capital program delivers on its rate base expansion, cash conversion could normalize toward positive territory within a few years.
The stock is trading above its near-term resistance target, leaving a negative implied return to that level and an unfavorable risk/reward that caps near-term appreciation potential for new positions.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- This pillar is falsified if a structural catalyst drives analyst consensus targets above $75, creating more than 10% implied upside from the current price.
CounterUtilities often trade on dividend yield dynamics rather than near-term price targets; if long-term interest rates decline, the stock can sustain a premium to resistance levels as yield-seeking investors bid up the shares.
With approximately 80% of operations concentrated in Virginia and roughly 95% of revenue under state-regulated utility structures, the company's earnings are highly sensitive to a single regulatory regime — any adverse commission ruling could impair earnings across the vast majority of the business simultaneously.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- This pillar is falsified if Virginia operations fall below 65% of total revenue over 2 consecutive fiscal years, demonstrating that meaningful geographic diversification is underway.
CounterConcentration in a single well-understood regulatory jurisdiction can be a stability advantage; a constructive and longstanding relationship with the Virginia State Corporation Commission may reduce regulatory uncertainty rather than amplify it.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Dominion Energy has beaten earnings expectations in all four of the last four quarters and is growing revenue at a pace that leads its utility peers, but the stock has moved above its near-term resistance target, free cash flow is deeply negative despite strong accounting margins, and the dividend yield may be uncovered by cash generation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.3 |
| ROA | 2.1 |
| Gross margin | 5.5 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 8.5 |
| Current ratio | 3.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Strong margins: 17%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -337% FCF/NI
Growth
4.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 8.3 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 23% YoY
Momentum
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 2.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.9 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.9 |
| erm sentiment | 6.4 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
6.1/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.8 |
| quality rank | 6.2 |
| growth rank | 9.5 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.2 |
| support resistance | 0.9 |
| 52w position | 9.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.3 |
| days to cover | 8.3 |
| volatility | 8.2 |
| put call | 7.4 |
| implied vol | 6.8 |
| beta | 9.2 |
| debt equity | 3.9 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1Passed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:26d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.7<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-2.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-2.20
Upside
-13.5%
Downside
6.1%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 26d with 4/4 beat streak
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.0 below the 5.4 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.7<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-2.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -2.20 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4, Catalyst at 6.3, and Peer rank at 6.1; the weakest are Momentum at 3.7, Technical at 4.0, and Growth at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.20 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Perfect Earnings Beat Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, breaking the beat streak.
- P2Negative Free Cash Flow Dividend Risk
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive (above 0%) for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Above Target Limited Near Term Upside
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $75, creating more than 10% implied upside from the current price.
- P4Geographic Regulatory Concentration
Trip ifVirginia operations fall below 65% of total revenue over 2 consecutive fiscal years.