HIGHBuilt-inProduct / Revenue mix
91%
top seven prestige fragrance brands
“10-K Item 1: 'approximately 91% was from our top seven prestige fragrance brands'”
COTY · Concentration risk · 10-K extracted
Coty (COTY) concentration risks
Updated
The most significant concentration Coty discloses is top seven prestige fragrance brands at 91%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Coty’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
At a glance
Disclosed-size breakdown · 3 disclosed concentrations
HIGH2
MEDIUM0
LOW1
Disclosed concentrations
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
HIGHBuilt-inProduct / Revenue mix
60%
prestige fragrance
“10-K Item 1: 'approximately 60% of our fiscal 2025 net revenues were attributable to prestige fragrance'”
LOWOutside partyCustomer
4%
Walmart and A.S. Watson
“10-K Item 1: 'Walmart and A.S. Watson, our top retailers, each accounted for approximately 4% of total Coty Inc. net revenues.'”
TrendMatrix Research · concentration synthesis
What these concentrations mean together
updated 2026-08-23Coty's concentration risk is overwhelmingly product-driven rather than customer-driven. Approximately 91% of the business, per the cited claim, comes from its top seven prestige fragrance brands, a high-share structural concentration in a narrow set of named brands rather than a broad portfolio. That sits alongside a broader category concentration: approximately 60% of fiscal 2025 net revenues were attributable to prestige fragrance overall, also high-share and structural, meaning the fragrance category itself — not just the top seven brands within it — is the dominant driver of results. Customer concentration, by contrast, is modest: Walmart and A.S. Watson, Coty's top retailers, each accounted for approximately 4% of total Coty Inc. net revenues, a low-share dependency that adds little idiosyncratic counterparty risk on its own. Netting these out, Coty's more consequential exposure is category and brand concentration rather than any single retail relationship — a shift in consumer demand for prestige fragrance, or specifically for the top seven brands within it, would move results far more than the loss of either named retailer, whose combined weight is comparatively small.
For the engine’s reasoning on COTY’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
Industry peers · Household & Personal Products
Peer concentration profile
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHD | Church & Dwight Company, Inc. | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| COTY● | Coty Inc. | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| EL | Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| ELF | e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| CL | Colgate-Palmolive Company | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| CLX | Clorox Company (The) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.