Value
8.3/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.39
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality at 3.7 falls below the 4.0 minimum threshold required for an investable setup, reflecting weak return metrics and operating margins that fail the baseline for sustainable value creation. Warnings | If this constraint is resolved, the quality assessment should rise above 4.0 on 2 consecutive evaluation cycles, confirming a genuine fundamental turn. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 indicates improving financial health at the balance-sheet level; the aggregate quality shortfall may be driven by a subset of weak return metrics rather than broad fundamental failure. | ||
A forward P/E of 13.2 times and a PEG of 0.40 place the stock at an attractive discount, with analyst consensus implying approximately 53% upside to the $27.26 target. Valuation breakdown | The forward earnings multiple expands toward 18 times over 12 months as the value gap closes and the stock trades meaningfully toward the analyst consensus target. | →Stable |
| CounterBusiness quality below the 4.0 floor indicates fundamental weaknesses that may justify a structurally discounted multiple; the low price may reflect the business's underlying economics rather than market mispricing. | ||
Four consecutive earnings beats averaging 10.9% above consensus — most recent at 13.4%, followed by 5.5%, 17.0%, and 7.6% — demonstrate consistent delivery above expectations across varied market conditions. Earnings | Beat streak extends for at least two more quarters with average EPS surprise above 5%. | →Stable |
| CounterEarnings beats sit against a backdrop of quality below the minimum threshold; beats achieved during a period of weak fundamental quality can reflect non-recurring items rather than durable operational improvement. | ||
The 200-day moving average is declining at 2.5% per month in a confirmed downtrend, and a put/call ratio of 1.33 signals that options market participants are positioned defensively — both signals argue against near-term price recovery. Momentum breakdown | If these headwinds clear, the MA slope should turn positive and the put/call ratio should compress below 0.80 within two quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterMACD is improving and OBV is rising (volume accumulation), indicating underlying buying pressure may be building beneath the negative price trend — a divergence that can precede a trend reversal. | ||
CounterA Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 indicates improving financial health at the balance-sheet level; the aggregate quality shortfall may be driven by a subset of weak return metrics rather than broad fundamental failure.
CounterBusiness quality below the 4.0 floor indicates fundamental weaknesses that may justify a structurally discounted multiple; the low price may reflect the business's underlying economics rather than market mispricing.
CounterEarnings beats sit against a backdrop of quality below the minimum threshold; beats achieved during a period of weak fundamental quality can reflect non-recurring items rather than durable operational improvement.
CounterMACD is improving and OBV is rising (volume accumulation), indicating underlying buying pressure may be building beneath the negative price trend — a divergence that can precede a trend reversal.
A forward P/E of 13.2 times, a PEG of 0.40, and four consecutive earnings beats offer a potentially attractive valuation entry point, but business quality below the 4.0 minimum floor and a confirmed downtrend with elevated bearish options positioning (put/call ratio of 1.33) mean the setup does not yet support an investable position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.1 |
| ROA | 1.4 |
| Gross margin | 3.4 |
| Op margin | 0.9 |
| Net margin | 2.3 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 9.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 9.0 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| erm sentiment | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.6 |
| quality rank | 4.4 |
| growth rank | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.4 |
| support resistance | 5.3 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.5 |
| days to cover | 5.8 |
| volatility | 3.5 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.1 |
| beta | 8.8 |
| debt equity | 7.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.9 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -53% (>40% off 52w high)
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 8.3 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.3, Sentiment at 8.1, and Catalyst at 7.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.5, Quality at 3.7, and Technical at 4.2. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 7.43 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E expands above 20x for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the valuation discount has closed.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive evaluation cycles.
Trip ifPrice closes above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading sessions and put/call ratio falls below 0.80.