Value
6.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.8 |
| PEG | 3.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.6x
- ▸PEG: 2.79
BCH · Why this verdict
Why Banco De Chile (BCH) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The bank has missed consensus earnings estimates in every one of the last four quarters, with misses ranging from roughly 2% to 7% and an average shortfall of about 4.5%; this unbroken pattern indicates the business is operating persistently below what analysts expect, suggesting either deteriorating fundamentals or structurally over-optimistic consensus assumptions. Earnings | The streak breaks with at least one positive EPS surprise in the next 2 quarters, demonstrating that estimates have reset to a level the business can actually meet or beat. | →Stable |
| CounterA miss streak in the 2-7% range is narrow rather than catastrophic and may reflect conservative accounting or seasonal timing effects rather than a fundamental deterioration; a single positive surprise could quickly reframe the narrative. | ||
The stock has reached its price target, leaving no remaining upside against the resistance level, while the downside to the stop remains at roughly 5%; the reward-to-risk ratio is unfavorable and the asymmetry gate has failed with a negative ratio, meaning the current entry point offers no margin for further appreciation. Warnings | A new catalyst drives analyst price target upgrades that raise the take-profit level at least 10% above the current price, restoring a constructive asymmetry. | →Stable |
| CounterPrice targets are periodically revised upward for operationally improving companies; if the earnings miss streak breaks and revenue stabilizes, analysts may raise targets, creating fresh upside from the current level. | ||
Business quality scores below the minimum acceptable threshold at 3.6, and the Piotroski financial strength score of 2 out of 9 is among the weakest possible readings, flagging multiple simultaneous balance-sheet and profitability deterioration signals that undermine confidence in the reported 44% net margin. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski score rises above 5 out of 9 and the quality score climbs above 4.0 over the next four reported quarters, confirming that the balance-sheet signals are improving. | →Stable |
| CounterThe company's net margin of 44% and return on equity rank highly relative to regional bank peers, suggesting that the Piotroski weakness may reflect measurement artifacts specific to international bank reporting rather than genuine financial stress. | ||
Revenue declined 8% over the measured period, with earnings growth also absent, leaving the company without the topline momentum needed to offset valuation or leverage concerns and signaling that the business has not yet found a path to renewed growth. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive on a year-over-year basis for 2 consecutive reported quarters, indicating that the contraction phase has ended. | →Stable |
| CounterRegional bank revenues can swing sharply with interest rate cycles and currency moves; a rate environment shift or a stabilization in local currency conditions could reverse the revenue decline without requiring structural business improvement. | ||
The bank has missed consensus earnings estimates in every one of the last four quarters, with misses ranging from roughly 2% to 7% and an average shortfall of about 4.5%; this unbroken pattern indicates the business is operating persistently below what analysts expect, suggesting either deteriorating fundamentals or structurally over-optimistic consensus assumptions.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The streak breaks with at least one positive EPS surprise in the next 2 quarters, demonstrating that estimates have reset to a level the business can actually meet or beat.
CounterA miss streak in the 2-7% range is narrow rather than catastrophic and may reflect conservative accounting or seasonal timing effects rather than a fundamental deterioration; a single positive surprise could quickly reframe the narrative.
The stock has reached its price target, leaving no remaining upside against the resistance level, while the downside to the stop remains at roughly 5%; the reward-to-risk ratio is unfavorable and the asymmetry gate has failed with a negative ratio, meaning the current entry point offers no margin for further appreciation.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- A new catalyst drives analyst price target upgrades that raise the take-profit level at least 10% above the current price, restoring a constructive asymmetry.
CounterPrice targets are periodically revised upward for operationally improving companies; if the earnings miss streak breaks and revenue stabilizes, analysts may raise targets, creating fresh upside from the current level.
Business quality scores below the minimum acceptable threshold at 3.6, and the Piotroski financial strength score of 2 out of 9 is among the weakest possible readings, flagging multiple simultaneous balance-sheet and profitability deterioration signals that undermine confidence in the reported 44% net margin.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The Piotroski score rises above 5 out of 9 and the quality score climbs above 4.0 over the next four reported quarters, confirming that the balance-sheet signals are improving.
CounterThe company's net margin of 44% and return on equity rank highly relative to regional bank peers, suggesting that the Piotroski weakness may reflect measurement artifacts specific to international bank reporting rather than genuine financial stress.
Revenue declined 8% over the measured period, with earnings growth also absent, leaving the company without the topline momentum needed to offset valuation or leverage concerns and signaling that the business has not yet found a path to renewed growth.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive on a year-over-year basis for 2 consecutive reported quarters, indicating that the contraction phase has ended.
CounterRegional bank revenues can swing sharply with interest rate cycles and currency moves; a rate environment shift or a stabilization in local currency conditions could reverse the revenue decline without requiring structural business improvement.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Banco De Chile has reached its price target with no remaining upside, has missed earnings estimates in all four trailing quarters, and carries quality metrics below the minimum floor alongside an 8% revenue decline; strong near-term price momentum provides a temporary technical tailwind but the fundamental and valuation picture does not support a constructive position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 6.9 |
| ROA | 1.4 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.8 |
| Piotroski F | 2.2 |
- ▸Strong margins: 44%
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 2/9
Growth
0.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.5 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -8%
Momentum
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.2 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 4.3 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
4.3/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.2 |
| quality rank | 9.5 |
| growth rank | 0.4 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.3 |
| support resistance | 2.9 |
| 52w position | 7.9 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.8 |
| days to cover | 8.2 |
| volatility | 5.4 |
| put call | 7.8 |
| implied vol | 3.7 |
| beta | 10.0 |
Catalyst
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.3 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 0B/4M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.4>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:26d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.53
Upside
-16.1%
Downside
10.5%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 49 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5, Momentum at 6.4, and Value at 6.2; the weakest are Growth at 0.2, Catalyst at 2.8, and Quality at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.53 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Four Quarter Earnings Miss Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Price At Target Negative Asymmetry
Trip ifAnalyst price target rises above $45.00, restoring more than 10% upside from the current $40.95 price.
- P3Below Floor Quality Weak Piotroski
Trip ifPiotroski score rises above 5 out of 9 for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
- P4Revenue Decline Growth Deficit
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive and exceeds 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive reported quarters.