Skip to main content
ARESAres Management CorporationSell4.1·$136.85
ARES · Why this verdict

Why Ares Management (ARES) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.1/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Ares Management has strong momentum and institutional accumulation, but price sits within 2.2% of the analyst target against 13.9% downside, revenue is declining 19%, and quality is weak, so it is not a compelling add.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue is down 19% and the Piotroski F-Score is a weak 2/9 with no competitive moat, pushing quality to 4.5.

↓Deteriorating
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth turns positive and Piotroski score rises above 5.

CounterAlternative asset managers have lumpy revenue from performance fees, so a one-year drop may not reflect the fee-related earnings base.

Momentum scores 7.8 with rising OBV volume accumulation and price above the 200-day average in a breakout setup.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price holds above the 200-day average and momentum stays above 6.0.

CounterThe 200-day slope is flat, so the breakout may lack trend support and reverse.

Institutions are accumulating shares while insider activity is neutral with zero net buying or selling.

→Stable
Insider breakdown
Expectation
Institutional holdings continue to rise over the next 12 months.

CounterInsiders are not buying, so there is no confirming signal from management.

Only 2.2% upside remains to the analyst target versus 13.9% downside, a reward-to-risk of 0.16.

↓Deteriorating
Warnings
Expectation
Price pulls back or targets rise so reward-to-risk improves above 1.5.

CounterAnalyst targets can lag a rising price, so upside revisions may follow the breakout.

Debt-to-equity of 1.7 triggers a leverage penalty and short interest is 15%, signaling skepticism from short sellers.

↓Deteriorating
Key risks
Expectation
Short interest falls below 10% and leverage does not rise above 1.7.

CounterHigh short interest alongside rising momentum can fuel short covering that supports the price.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.5/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E0.0
P/S4.4
Fwd P/E6.9
PEG7.1
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 18.5x
  • ▸PEG: 0.99

Quality

4.5/10data confidence 71%
ComponentSub-score
Gross margin10.0
Op margin1.2
Net margin4.3
Moat4.8
Piotroski F2.2
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 2/9

Growth

0.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.0
EPS growth0.0
  • ▸Declining revenue: -19%

Momentum

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position7.5
Volume3.9
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 80)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 80 (late-cycle distribution risk)

Sentiment

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.9
Analyst rating7.5
Price target6.0
  • ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.38 (n=2)

Insider

7.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

1.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.8
quality rank1.4
growth rank1.1

Technical

2.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.3
52w position5.7
gap4.0

Risk (lower is worse)

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest2.7
days to cover3.8
volatility4.3
put call0.0
implied vol5.4
max pain risk3.0
beta5.0
debt equity3.6
news risk6.0
  • ▸Elevated put/call: 5.28
  • ▸Above max pain $90

Catalyst

4.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.2
dividend safety5.5
news activity6.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Dividend: 4.2%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:7.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:92d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.24
Upside
-3.7%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.51>1.3

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 7.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.24 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.3, Momentum at 7.1, and Sentiment at 6.9; the weakest are Growth at 0.0, Peer rank at 1.4, and Technical at 2.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.24 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Strong Breakout Momentum

    Trip ifMomentum score falls below 5.0 from current 7.8.

  • P2Institutional Accumulation

    Trip ifInstitutional ownership falls by more than 3 percentage points over 2 quarters.

  • P3Limited Upside To Target

    Trip ifPrice rises above the analyst target (upside falls below 0%) without target revisions.

  • P4Declining Revenue Weak Quality

    Trip ifRevenue declines more than 25% year over year.

  • P5Leverage And Short Interest

    Trip ifShort interest exceeds 20% of float from current 15%.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › ARES › Why this verdict