Value
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 5.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.3x
- ▸PEG: 1.29
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
ABM Industries is a cheaply valued facilities-services company with excellent cash conversion and a dividend-aristocrat record, but thin margins, no moat, a mixed earnings record and a price above the analyst target limit the case.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality is 3.8 against a 4.0 floor, with no competitive moat and very thin margins (operating margin component 1.7, net margin 0.9). Quality breakdown | Quality score should rise above 4.0 as margins edge higher over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThin margins are structural in labor-intensive facility services, so they do not signal distress by themselves. | ||
Cash conversion is excellent at 169% FCF/NI, giving the dividend and balance sheet room despite thin accounting margins. Quality breakdown | FCF/NI should stay above 120% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh FCF/NI on tiny net income can be an artifact of low earnings rather than strong cash generation. | ||
The stock trades at a forward P/E of 12.3x and PEG of 0.48 and is a dividend aristocrat with a 2.2% yield. Catalyst breakdown | The dividend should continue to grow and forward P/E should stay below 15x. | ↑Improving |
| CounterLow-growth service businesses often deserve low multiples, and the 2.2% yield is modest. | ||
Price of $53.48 is above the analyst target of $48.66 (upside_pct -9.0%), giving negative reward-to-risk of -0.87. Warnings | Analysts should raise targets toward the current price, or price should consolidate. | →Stable |
| CounterMomentum of 6.0 and price above the 200-day average suggest the move has support, and analyst coverage is light. | ||
Earnings are mixed with 2 beats and 2 misses over four quarters, while RSI is 77 (overbought) with falling OBV. Momentum breakdown | EPS should beat estimates in the next two quarters, following the $1.04 versus $1.01 expected latest report. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe last two quarters were both beats, so results may be improving. | ||
CounterThin margins are structural in labor-intensive facility services, so they do not signal distress by themselves.
CounterHigh FCF/NI on tiny net income can be an artifact of low earnings rather than strong cash generation.
CounterLow-growth service businesses often deserve low multiples, and the 2.2% yield is modest.
CounterMomentum of 6.0 and price above the 200-day average suggest the move has support, and analyst coverage is light.
CounterThe last two quarters were both beats, so results may be improving.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 5.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.1 |
| ROA | 2.7 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.7 |
| Net margin | 0.9 |
| Current ratio | 5.3 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 3.8 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.6 |
| EPS growth | 7.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.2 |
| MACD | 8.4 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.4 |
| Analyst rating | 6.7 |
| Price target | 5.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.4 |
| quality rank | 4.4 |
| growth rank | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.3 |
| support resistance | 0.8 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.7 |
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 7.4 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.7 |
| beta | 9.1 |
| debt equity | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.1 |
| dividend safety | 8.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.1B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -0.9=NEGATIVE outcome against Risk (lower is worse) at 7.3 and asymmetric R:R of -0.92.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.3, Value at 6.5, and Sentiment at 5.9; the weakest are Quality at 3.8, Technical at 4.2, and Peer rank at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.92 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin component falls below 1.0 from current 1.7.
Trip ifFCF/NI falls below 100% from current 169%.
Trip ifForward P/E exceeds 18x from current 12.3x.
Trip ifPrice rises more than 20% above the $48.66 analyst target without target increases.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.