Value
8.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.4 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.49
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Asbury Automotive is a cheap auto dealer (forward P/E 7.1x) but with a quality score of 1.3, declining revenue, a 0/9 Piotroski score and price above the analyst target, leaving little to support the stock beyond valuation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality is 1.3 against a 4.0 floor, with a 0/9 Piotroski F-Score, no competitive moat and thin margins (operating margin component 1.9, net margin 1.3). Quality breakdown | Quality score should rise above 4.0 as margins stabilize over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterDealerships operate on structurally thin margins, so a low margin score reflects the industry rather than company-specific distress. | ||
Revenue is declining 8% and the growth score is only 0.2/10, with growth rank last among peers. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should return above 0% YoY within 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterUsed and new vehicle demand cycles can turn quickly, and a cyclical dealer's revenue can rebound with volumes. | ||
The stock is attractively valued at a forward P/E of 7.1x and PEG of 0.49, ranking well on P/E versus peers. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E should stay below 10x as earnings recover. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA low multiple on declining earnings is a classic value-trap pattern, and earnings may fall further. | ||
Price of $198.03 is above the analyst target of $194.64 (upside_pct -1.7%), leaving negative reward-to-risk of -0.11. Warnings | Analysts should raise targets, or price should consolidate toward the target. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe gap is small and a recent analyst upgrade in the news may lead to higher targets. | ||
The latest quarter missed ($6.16 versus $6.42 expected), earnings history scores 1.1/10, and short interest is 13% with implied volatility of 154%. Catalyst breakdown | EPS should beat estimates in the next two quarters. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe prior quarter beat by 8.13%, so misses may be isolated rather than a trend. | ||
CounterDealerships operate on structurally thin margins, so a low margin score reflects the industry rather than company-specific distress.
CounterUsed and new vehicle demand cycles can turn quickly, and a cyclical dealer's revenue can rebound with volumes.
CounterA low multiple on declining earnings is a classic value-trap pattern, and earnings may fall further.
CounterThe gap is small and a recent analyst upgrade in the news may lead to higher targets.
CounterThe prior quarter beat by 8.13%, so misses may be isolated rather than a trend.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.4 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.9 |
| ROA | 3.1 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.9 |
| Net margin | 1.3 |
| Current ratio | 3.6 |
| FCF quality | 9.1 |
| Moat | 3.1 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.5 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.8 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 1.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 6.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.3 |
| quality rank | 3.7 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.5 |
| support resistance | 2.2 |
| 52w position | 5.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.7 |
| days to cover | 6.2 |
| volatility | 0.5 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 4.9 |
| beta | 8.5 |
| debt equity | 4.3 |
| news risk | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 73
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.7B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -0.1=NEGATIVE outcome against Value at 8.2 and asymmetric R:R of -0.11.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.2, Sentiment at 6.3, and Momentum at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 0.2, Technical at 3.0, and Quality at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.11 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from current 1.3.
Trip ifRevenue decline exceeds 12% YoY from current -8%.
Trip ifForward P/E exceeds 12x from current 7.1x.
Trip ifPrice falls more than 7% below the current $198.03, crossing the $184.17 stop level.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.