Skip to main content
ABGAsbury Automotive Group IncSell4.6·$197.77
ABG · Why this verdict

Why Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Asbury Automotive is a cheap auto dealer (forward P/E 7.1x) but with a quality score of 1.3, declining revenue, a 0/9 Piotroski score and price above the analyst target, leaving little to support the stock beyond valuation.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quality is 1.3 against a 4.0 floor, with a 0/9 Piotroski F-Score, no competitive moat and thin margins (operating margin component 1.9, net margin 1.3).

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Quality score should rise above 4.0 as margins stabilize over the next 12 months.

CounterDealerships operate on structurally thin margins, so a low margin score reflects the industry rather than company-specific distress.

Revenue is declining 8% and the growth score is only 0.2/10, with growth rank last among peers.

↓Deteriorating
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth should return above 0% YoY within 12 months.

CounterUsed and new vehicle demand cycles can turn quickly, and a cyclical dealer's revenue can rebound with volumes.

The stock is attractively valued at a forward P/E of 7.1x and PEG of 0.49, ranking well on P/E versus peers.

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E should stay below 10x as earnings recover.

CounterA low multiple on declining earnings is a classic value-trap pattern, and earnings may fall further.

Price of $198.03 is above the analyst target of $194.64 (upside_pct -1.7%), leaving negative reward-to-risk of -0.11.

↓Deteriorating
Warnings
Expectation
Analysts should raise targets, or price should consolidate toward the target.

CounterThe gap is small and a recent analyst upgrade in the news may lead to higher targets.

The latest quarter missed ($6.16 versus $6.42 expected), earnings history scores 1.1/10, and short interest is 13% with implied volatility of 154%.

↓Deteriorating
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
EPS should beat estimates in the next two quarters.

CounterThe prior quarter beat by 8.13%, so misses may be isolated rather than a trend.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E9.4
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA6.2
Fwd P/E9.7
PEG10.0
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 7.4x
  • ▸PEG: 0.49
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.9
ROA3.1
Gross margin0.0
Op margin1.9
Net margin1.3
Current ratio3.6
FCF quality9.1
Moat3.1
Piotroski F3.3
  • ▸Excellent cash conversion: 123% FCF/NI
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 3/9

Growth

0.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.5
EPS growth0.0
  • ▸Declining revenue: -8%

Momentum

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI2.8
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position6.0
Volume1.6
  • ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 73)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -4.5%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.0
Analyst rating7.0
Price target6.9

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.5/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.3
quality rank3.7
growth rank0.0
  • ▸Attractive P/E vs peers

Technical

3.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.5
support resistance2.2
52w position5.3

Risk (lower is worse)

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest3.7
days to cover6.2
volatility0.5
put call10.0
implied vol4.9
beta8.5
debt equity4.3
news risk5.5

Catalyst

4.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history1.1
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg2.5
news activity8.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.60
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:90d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE
Warning (2)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.1>=5.0 recovering
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.11
Upside
-1.6%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 73

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.7B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -0.1=NEGATIVE outcome against Value at 8.2 and asymmetric R:R of -0.11.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.2, Sentiment at 6.3, and Momentum at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 0.2, Technical at 3.0, and Quality at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.11 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Weak Quality No Moat

    Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from current 1.3.

  • P2Declining Revenue Weak Growth

    Trip ifRevenue decline exceeds 12% YoY from current -8%.

  • P3Cheap Valuation

    Trip ifForward P/E exceeds 12x from current 7.1x.

  • P4Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifPrice falls more than 7% below the current $198.03, crossing the $184.17 stop level.

  • P5Mixed Earnings And Short Interest

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › ABG › Why this verdict