Value
9.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.5x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
AHCO · Why this verdict
Why AdaptHealth (AHCO) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
A deeply discounted valuation and rising volume accumulation contrast sharply with a pattern of persistent earnings misses and business quality metrics well below the minimum acceptable threshold, making the setup speculative and uninvestable despite the favorable headline risk/reward geometry.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality at 1.9 out of 10 is well below the 4.0 minimum floor, with near-zero net margin, near-zero return on equity, thin gross margin, and no identifiable competitive moat — a combination that raises serious questions about long-run earnings sustainability. Warnings | Quality metrics improve above the 4.0 floor over the next 4 quarters, with return on equity turning meaningfully positive and gross margin expanding materially from current levels. | →Stable |
| CounterCurrent depressed quality metrics may reflect a transitional period rather than a permanent structural condition; if margins recover from a cyclically depressed base, the quality floor can be cleared relatively quickly. | ||
A forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.5x and a PEG ratio of 0.03 place the stock at a deep discount to its stated earnings and growth profile, suggesting the market has priced in a highly pessimistic scenario. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E remains below 12x while analyst price targets hold or rise over the next 12 months, preserving the discount even as estimates stabilize. | →Stable |
| CounterAn extremely low PEG and P/E can reflect genuine structural deterioration in earnings power that makes current consensus estimates unreliable; if earnings are revised down materially, the apparent cheapness may be illusory. | ||
The company has missed earnings estimates in three of the four most recent quarters — including a severe miss of approximately -530% most recently, followed by a -21% miss — with zero beats in the period, indicating persistent and worsening execution risk. Earnings | EPS beats consensus estimates in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters with a positive average surprise, signaling the miss pattern has broken. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one in-line quarter in the period shows the company can at least meet sufficiently lowered expectations; if guidance is reset to a conservatively low bar, subsequent quarters could stabilize or produce modest beats from that reset base. | ||
On-balance volume is rising (consistent with accumulation), and the 200-day moving average is still trending upward at approximately +1.8% per month — suggesting the current price weakness may be a pullback within a longer-term uptrend rather than confirmed structural breakdown. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims the 200-day moving average within 60 days while on-balance volume continues to rise, confirming the pullback-in-uptrend characterization holds. | →Stable |
| CounterRising on-balance volume and a still-ascending long-term average are necessary but not sufficient signals; if earnings continue to miss and quality metrics do not improve, accumulation by some buyers may prove insufficient to prevent further price deterioration. | ||
Business quality at 1.9 out of 10 is well below the 4.0 minimum floor, with near-zero net margin, near-zero return on equity, thin gross margin, and no identifiable competitive moat — a combination that raises serious questions about long-run earnings sustainability.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Quality metrics improve above the 4.0 floor over the next 4 quarters, with return on equity turning meaningfully positive and gross margin expanding materially from current levels.
CounterCurrent depressed quality metrics may reflect a transitional period rather than a permanent structural condition; if margins recover from a cyclically depressed base, the quality floor can be cleared relatively quickly.
A forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.5x and a PEG ratio of 0.03 place the stock at a deep discount to its stated earnings and growth profile, suggesting the market has priced in a highly pessimistic scenario.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward P/E remains below 12x while analyst price targets hold or rise over the next 12 months, preserving the discount even as estimates stabilize.
CounterAn extremely low PEG and P/E can reflect genuine structural deterioration in earnings power that makes current consensus estimates unreliable; if earnings are revised down materially, the apparent cheapness may be illusory.
The company has missed earnings estimates in three of the four most recent quarters — including a severe miss of approximately -530% most recently, followed by a -21% miss — with zero beats in the period, indicating persistent and worsening execution risk.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS beats consensus estimates in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters with a positive average surprise, signaling the miss pattern has broken.
CounterThe one in-line quarter in the period shows the company can at least meet sufficiently lowered expectations; if guidance is reset to a conservatively low bar, subsequent quarters could stabilize or produce modest beats from that reset base.
On-balance volume is rising (consistent with accumulation), and the 200-day moving average is still trending upward at approximately +1.8% per month — suggesting the current price weakness may be a pullback within a longer-term uptrend rather than confirmed structural breakdown.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Price reclaims the 200-day moving average within 60 days while on-balance volume continues to rise, confirming the pullback-in-uptrend characterization holds.
CounterRising on-balance volume and a still-ascending long-term average are necessary but not sufficient signals; if earnings continue to miss and quality metrics do not improve, accumulation by some buyers may prove insufficient to prevent further price deterioration.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
1.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.8 |
| Gross margin | 0.1 |
| Op margin | 0.3 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 3.7 |
| Moat | 3.6 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
6.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.8 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 7.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+1.1%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
Sentiment
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.3 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 42%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $113,426 (0.008% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.5 |
| quality rank | 2.7 |
| growth rank | 3.3 |
Technical
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.2 |
| support resistance | 5.8 |
| 52w position | 4.7 |
Risk (lower is worse)
3.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.3 |
| days to cover | 5.5 |
| volatility | 4.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 2.1 |
| beta | 5.1 |
| debt equity | 4.4 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 5.00
- ▸High IV: 68%
Catalyst
2.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 0B/3M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (8)
- MOMENTUM:4.8>=4.5
- ASYMMETRY:3.4>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:39d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- MOMENTUM:4.8<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
3.43
Upside
+23.5%
Downside
6.8%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRANGE_BOUND — RSI 53 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.46>1.3, MCap $1.4B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.1, Growth at 6.9, and Sentiment at 6.4; the weakest are Quality at 1.9, Catalyst at 2.5, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.9. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.43 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1A forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.5x and a PEG ratio of 0.03 place the stock at a deep discount to its stated earnings and growth profile, suggesting the market has priced in a highly pessimistic scenario.
Trip ifForward P/E expands above 15x while consensus EPS estimates for the next fiscal year are revised down by more than 20%.
- P2The company has missed earnings estimates in three of the four most recent quarters — including a severe miss of approximately -530% most recently, followed by a -21% miss — with zero beats in the period, indicating persistent and worsening execution risk.
Trip ifEPS beats consensus in at least 2 of the next 4 consecutive quarters with a positive average surprise.
- P3Business quality at 1.9 out of 10 is well below the 4.0 minimum floor, with near-zero net margin, near-zero return on equity, thin gross margin, and no identifiable competitive moat — a combination that raises serious questions about long-run earnings sustainability.
Trip ifOverall quality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarterly assessments.
- P4On-balance volume is rising (consistent with accumulation), and the 200-day moving average is still trending upward at approximately +1.8% per month — suggesting the current price weakness may be a pullback within a longer-term uptrend rather than confirmed structural breakdown.
Trip ifPrice falls more than 15% below the 200-day moving average for more than 30 consecutive trading days.