Skip to main content
YPFYPF Sociedad AnonimaSell6.5·$43.56
YPF · Why this verdict

Why YPF Sociedad Anonima (YPF) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.5/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

YPF is an Argentine integrated oil and gas company generating 43% revenue growth year-over-year and trading at a forward P/E of 9.3x, but it has missed earnings in 3 of 4 recent quarters with an average negative surprise of 147%, carries below-average business quality at 3.0, and shows free cash flow burning at negative 6% of revenue.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Free cash flow is burning at negative 6% of revenue, and the quality score of 3.0 sits below the 4.0 minimum threshold, with zero ROE and zero net margin scores, indicating the company is consuming capital faster than it generates it despite the top-line growth rate.

↑Improving
Quality breakdown
Expectation
FCF turns positive, above 0% of revenue, within 12 months as capital expenditure on Vaca Muerta shale investments begins to generate cash returns.

CounterIntegrated energy companies in development-phase shale programs routinely remain free cash flow negative for multiple years as they fund well completions, and YPF's negative FCF may be structurally necessary for the growth thesis to play out.

Revenue grew 43% year-over-year, ranking YPF as the industry growth leader among peers, yet EPS has missed consensus expectations in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average negative surprise of 147%, including a 314% miss in February 2026, indicating that revenue growth is not translating into predictable earnings.

↑Improving
Earnings
Expectation
EPS surprise turns positive in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters and average negative surprise shrinks to less than 20%, demonstrating that cost discipline is catching up to revenue growth.

CounterArgentine peso devaluations and sovereign debt restructurings historically create massive accounting distortions in reporting that generate large EPS misses even when operating performance is healthy.

Positive news sentiment of plus 1.00 and an analyst upside of roughly 7% to consensus target reflect cautious optimism about Argentina's macroeconomic stabilization, but the put-to-call ratio of 1.46 and elevated implied volatility signal that options market participants are paying to hedge Argentine sovereign risk.

↓Deteriorating
Risk breakdown
Expectation
Put-to-call ratio falls below 1.0 within 12 months if Argentina's macroeconomic environment stabilizes and the Argentine peso strengthens.

CounterArgentine sovereign risk has historically been underestimated before default cycles, and the current positive sentiment may be premature given the country's track record of fiscal and currency instability.

The stock has reached its analyst price target with negative 6.2% implied upside and a negative asymmetry ratio of negative 0.42, meaning current holders assume 15% downside risk against essentially zero additional upside according to consensus models.

Tripped↓Deteriorating
Warnings
Expectation
Analyst consensus target rises above $60 within 12 months as the revenue growth trajectory attracts earnings upgrades that outpace current pessimism.

CounterAnalyst targets for Argentine ADRs are revised aggressively downward during periods of peso weakness or political instability, so the 6.2% negative upside may understate the risk of target cuts.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E9.3
P/S9.7
EV/EBITDA9.8
Fwd P/E9.7
PEG10.0
Analyst target7.5
  • ▸Forward P/E: 7.3x
  • ▸PEG: 0.01
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE6.2
ROA6.9
Gross margin4.1
Op margin10.0
Net margin5.8
Current ratio4.7
FCF quality3.1
Moat6.9
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 39% FCF/NI
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

7.9/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
EPS growth5.8
  • ▸Strong growth: 58% YoY

Momentum

1.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.0
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
Volume0.0
  • ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 22, below 200MA)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+5.0%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.2
Price target9.3
erm sentiment4.6
  • ▸Analyst upside: 43%

Insider

6.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change8.6
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

5.8/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.6
quality rank4.7
growth rank9.4
  • ▸Industry growth leader

Technical

7.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger10.0
support resistance9.5
52w position5.1
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
days to cover5.8
volatility1.1
put call10.0
implied vol4.8
max pain risk7.0
debt equity6.3

Catalyst

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier -1 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → SELL_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=-1
Passed (7)
  • ASYMMETRY:2.6>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:100d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • MOMENTUM:1.2<4.5
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
2.65
Upside
+24.2%
Downside
9.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:2.6>=1.5. Top dim: Value at 9.3; weakest: Momentum at 1.2. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.3, Growth at 7.9, and Technical at 7.7; the weakest are Momentum at 1.2, Catalyst at 3.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.65 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Revenue Growth Vs Earnings Miss Pattern

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below negative 50% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, indicating the miss pattern is worsening rather than normalizing.

  • P2Fcf Negative Quality Below Floor

    Trip ifFCF remains below negative 10% of revenue for at least 2 consecutive quarters, indicating capital burn is accelerating.

  • P3Argentina Country Risk Earnings Distortion

    Trip ifPut-to-call ratio rises above 2.0, exceeding the current 1.46 level by more than 37%.

  • P4Target Reached Negative AsymmetryTripped

    Trip ifPrice falls below $48.91 stop-loss, declining more than 7% from the current $52.59.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › YPF › Why this verdict
Why TrendMatrix rates YPF the way it does — verdict reasoning