Value
7.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.8 |
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.05
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow conversion at 412% of net income, combined with a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9, indicates that Expro is generating significantly more cash than reported earnings suggest, providing a financial cushion despite the headline quality concerns. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion remains above 200% of net income over the next 12 months as working capital management stays disciplined. | →Stable |
| CounterExtremely high FCF-to-earnings ratios can reflect one-time working capital releases or depreciation timing rather than sustainable cash generation capacity in oilfield services. | ||
Revenue is declining 6% year-over-year, which combined with thin operating and net margins near zero on a segment basis, places the quality score just below the 4.0 minimum at 3.9, indicating the business has not yet reached a self-sustaining earnings level. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth returns to positive territory above 0% year-over-year within 12 months as oilfield services activity recovers in the company's geographic markets. | →Stable |
| CounterOilfield services demand is directly tied to global oil prices and E&P capex cycles, and if oil prices fall below $65 per barrel, activity levels and company revenue could decline further. | ||
The stock trades at essentially its analyst consensus target with negative 0.1% implied upside, resulting in a negative asymmetry ratio and a reward-to-risk ratio of just 1.07x against a 7% stop-loss, meaning the current entry offers no margin of safety. Warnings | Analyst consensus target rises above $18 within 12 months as earnings estimate revisions, which are trending up 49% over 30 days, translate into formal target upgrades. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst estimates for small-cap oilfield services firms often lead price targets by several quarters, and the current estimate revision momentum may already be fully reflected in the stock price. | ||
The 30-day earnings estimate revision trend is up 49.1%, which is the strongest sentiment signal in the data bundle and suggests analysts are materially upgrading their forward estimates for Expro based on operational improvements. Sentiment breakdown | Forward earnings estimates rise by more than 20% above current consensus levels within 12 months, confirming the revision trend has staying power. | →Stable |
| CounterEstimate revisions in oilfield services can reverse quickly when oil price headwinds emerge, and the 49% revision rate may partly reflect a low prior baseline rather than a genuine earnings inflection. | ||
CounterExtremely high FCF-to-earnings ratios can reflect one-time working capital releases or depreciation timing rather than sustainable cash generation capacity in oilfield services.
CounterOilfield services demand is directly tied to global oil prices and E&P capex cycles, and if oil prices fall below $65 per barrel, activity levels and company revenue could decline further.
CounterAnalyst estimates for small-cap oilfield services firms often lead price targets by several quarters, and the current estimate revision momentum may already be fully reflected in the stock price.
CounterEstimate revisions in oilfield services can reverse quickly when oil price headwinds emerge, and the 49% revision rate may partly reflect a low prior baseline rather than a genuine earnings inflection.
Expro Group is an oil and gas equipment and services company with exceptional free cash flow conversion at 412% of net income and a low forward P/E of 13.5x, but revenue is declining 6% year-over-year and the stock has reached its analyst price target, leaving essentially no near-term upside buffer.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.8 |
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.8 |
| ROA | 1.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.7 |
| Op margin | 0.7 |
| Net margin | 1.2 |
| Current ratio | 7.4 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 6.4 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 2.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.2 |
| erm sentiment | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.2 |
| quality rank | 3.0 |
| growth rank | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.3 |
| support resistance | 6.3 |
| 52w position | 5.4 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.9 |
| days to cover | 3.3 |
| volatility | 1.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 7.1 |
| debt equity | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 7.5 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.6B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.6B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.8 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.2<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.8, Sentiment at 7.4, and Catalyst at 7.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.5, Momentum at 3.2, and Quality at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.77 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 100% of net income, declining more than 75% from the current 412% level.
Trip ifRevenue declines more than 10% year-over-year in any of the next 2 reported quarters, exceeding the current 6% decline.
Trip ifPrice falls below $14.57 stop-loss, declining more than 7% from the current $15.67.
Trip ifForward earnings estimates fall below their current level by more than 15%, reversing the 49% upward revision trend.