Value
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.6 |
| P/S | 8.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.2 |
| PEG | 5.5 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.5x
- ▸PEG: 1.38
XOM · Why this verdict
Why ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Business quality falls below the minimum acceptable threshold — with free cash flow at only 46% of net income and no competitive moat identified — while just 0.8% remains to the analyst price target of $152.92, leaving risk/reward unfavorable. An inconsistent earnings track record of two beats and two misses over the trailing four quarters, combined with a dividend flagged as a potential yield trap, reinforce the case for caution.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
With only 0.8% remaining to the analyst price target of $152.92 and risk/reward pointing unfavorably, the current setup offers insufficient reward for the risks embedded in a below-quality, dividend-uncertain business. Price targets | If the risk/reward thesis proves wrong, price retreats from current levels and re-enters a zone where upside to the analyst target exceeds 5%, restoring a meaningful margin of safety. | →Stable |
| CounterA strong earnings print can prompt analysts to revise the price target upward, which may restore meaningful upside beyond the current 0.8%; the most recent quarter's 12.52% positive surprise is the kind of result that can lead to target upgrades if sustained. | ||
The dividend yield has been flagged as a potential yield trap — high yield but with safety concerns — and free cash flow at only 46% of net income suggests the payout may not be fully covered by cash generation, raising the risk of a dividend reduction. Catalyst breakdown | If the dividend proves safe, free-cash-flow-to-net-income should rise above 80% from the current 46% over 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating adequate cash coverage of the payout. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent earnings beat of 12.52% may indicate an improving cash generation picture; if free cash flow improves materially from the current 46% of net income, the dividend could prove more durable than the current yield-trap flag implies. | ||
Quality metrics fall below the minimum acceptable threshold — with free cash flow at only 46% of net income flagged as a red flag and no competitive moat identified — making sustained outperformance an unlikely outcome without a meaningful improvement in earnings quality. Quality breakdown | If the quality thesis proves wrong, the free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio should rise above 60% from the current 46% over the next 12 months, signaling a genuine improvement in earnings quality. | →Stable |
| CounterAt a forward P/E of 14.3x and PEG of 1.38, the shares may attract buyers willing to accept a quality shortfall in exchange for a lower multiple; if free-cash-flow conversion improves from the current 46%, the quality concerns could diminish and support a re-rating. | ||
Two of the last four quarters missed estimates — with the two consecutive misses logged before the most recent beat of 12.52% — creating an erratic earnings track record that undermines confidence in forward guidance visibility. Earnings | If earnings consistency improves, EPS should beat consensus for the next 2 consecutive quarters with positive surprise percentages, demonstrating that the most recent beat represents a sustainable trend. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter's 12.52% positive surprise is the strongest result of the trailing four periods and could represent a turning point; if the company delivers consistent beats over the next two quarters, the inconsistency concern would diminish materially. | ||
With only 0.8% remaining to the analyst price target of $152.92 and risk/reward pointing unfavorably, the current setup offers insufficient reward for the risks embedded in a below-quality, dividend-uncertain business.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- If the risk/reward thesis proves wrong, price retreats from current levels and re-enters a zone where upside to the analyst target exceeds 5%, restoring a meaningful margin of safety.
CounterA strong earnings print can prompt analysts to revise the price target upward, which may restore meaningful upside beyond the current 0.8%; the most recent quarter's 12.52% positive surprise is the kind of result that can lead to target upgrades if sustained.
The dividend yield has been flagged as a potential yield trap — high yield but with safety concerns — and free cash flow at only 46% of net income suggests the payout may not be fully covered by cash generation, raising the risk of a dividend reduction.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- If the dividend proves safe, free-cash-flow-to-net-income should rise above 80% from the current 46% over 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating adequate cash coverage of the payout.
CounterThe most recent earnings beat of 12.52% may indicate an improving cash generation picture; if free cash flow improves materially from the current 46% of net income, the dividend could prove more durable than the current yield-trap flag implies.
Quality metrics fall below the minimum acceptable threshold — with free cash flow at only 46% of net income flagged as a red flag and no competitive moat identified — making sustained outperformance an unlikely outcome without a meaningful improvement in earnings quality.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- If the quality thesis proves wrong, the free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio should rise above 60% from the current 46% over the next 12 months, signaling a genuine improvement in earnings quality.
CounterAt a forward P/E of 14.3x and PEG of 1.38, the shares may attract buyers willing to accept a quality shortfall in exchange for a lower multiple; if free-cash-flow conversion improves from the current 46%, the quality concerns could diminish and support a re-rating.
Two of the last four quarters missed estimates — with the two consecutive misses logged before the most recent beat of 12.52% — creating an erratic earnings track record that undermines confidence in forward guidance visibility.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- If earnings consistency improves, EPS should beat consensus for the next 2 consecutive quarters with positive surprise percentages, demonstrating that the most recent beat represents a sustainable trend.
CounterThe most recent quarter's 12.52% positive surprise is the strongest result of the trailing four periods and could represent a turning point; if the company delivers consistent beats over the next two quarters, the inconsistency concern would diminish materially.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.2 |
| ROA | 3.7 |
| Gross margin | 2.0 |
| Op margin | 6.3 |
| Net margin | 4.5 |
| Current ratio | 4.4 |
| FCF quality | 4.9 |
| Moat | 6.9 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 63% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 44% YoY
Momentum
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.7 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 3.4 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 86)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 4.2 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 4.7 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.0/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.2 |
| quality rank | 2.9 |
| growth rank | 6.5 |
- ▸Conservative debt levels
Technical
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.6 |
| support resistance | 0.2 |
| 52w position | 9.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.5 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 7.1 |
| put call | 6.7 |
| implied vol | 6.5 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 9.4 |
| news risk | 3.0 |
- ▸Above max pain $85
Catalyst
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Earnings in 7 days
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Mixed signals. Hold existing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULTPassed (4)
- MOMENTUM:7.2>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:7d<=7d
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.91
Upside
-11.9%
Downside
13.1%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: MOMENTUM:7.2>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 10.0; weakest: Technical at 3.6. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Momentum at 7.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.0; the weakest are Technical at 3.6, Peer rank at 5.0, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.91 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Below Quality Minimum
Trip ifFCF/NI ratio rises above 60% from the current 46% for 2 consecutive reporting quarters.
- P2Unfavorable Reward Risk Setup
Trip ifPrice breaks above $152.92 and sustains above that level for 2 consecutive weeks.
- P3Earnings Track Record Inconsistent
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 12.52% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Dividend Sustainability Risk
Trip ifFCF/NI ratio rises above 80% from the current 46% for 2 consecutive quarters.